toasters July 2001

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

105 participants
139 discussions

RE: du -s after ndmpcopy - why are the filesizes different?
by Melvin, Grant 11 Jul '01

11 Jul '01

Hi Simon, In addition to Adam's comments: > the restore making better use of blocks since > it gets to re-write your data from scratch, etc. Directories on the source won't reclaim space from old entries on deletion, but will be reclaimed using restore via NDMPcopy. You will also probably have a restore_symboltable file on the destination side that is required by restore when doing incrementals. Cheers, Grant -----Original Message----- From: Fox, Adam [mailto:Adam.Fox@netapp.com] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 8:05 AM To: 'Clawson, Simon'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: du -s after ndmpcopy - why are the filesizes different? I guess my question is how different were the results? A couple of percentage different is normal in dump/restore situations, which ndmpcopy is. Things like the restore making better use of blocks since it gets to re-write your data from scratch, etc. As far as verifying ndmpcopy, remember that ndmpcopy is just a native ONTAP dump/restore so any method you would use to verify your backups would also apply here. Most of them are not fun like what has been suggested of comparing file by file. If you trust your backups, you should be able to trust ndmpcopy. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Clawson, Simon [mailto:simon_clawson@mentorg.com] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 8:11 AM > To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: du -s after ndmpcopy - why are the filesizes different? > > > I ran an NDMP copy on my filer to take some qtrees from one volume to > another. When I ran du -s on each directory the results were > different in > most cases. > > The question I have is - > Is NDMP copy the tool for the job, and how do I verify the > results once I > have run it? > > Any ideas? > > Simon > > Simon Clawson > HDS Team Systems Administrator > Mentor Graphics Uk > Rivergate > London Road > Newbury > Berkshire > RG14 2QB > <<Clawson, Simon.vcf>> >

1 0

NetBackup with large Indexes.
by Mati Giladi 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

Hi, We use Veritas Netabackup 3.4 to backup - on Solaris platform - Netapp / EMC in our site. The index size is growing to over then 70 Gb tape capacity. As far as we know the DbBackup ( the command that backup the index ) doesn't know to backup more then one tape capacity. One of the solutions is to backup the index using ufsdump ( it works ) to more the one tape. Does someone have any solution for this problem using the official veritas tool ( or other ) ? Mati Mati Giladi Phone: (972)-9-9522144 System & Storage Manager. Fax : (972)- 9-9522444/750 Motorola Semiconductor Israel LTD Mobile: (972)-51- 268348 1 Shenkar Street, Herzeliya, ISRAEL. P.O BOX 2208 Herzeliya, ZIP 46120 E-mail: M.Giladi(a)motorola.com

2 1

CA NDMP platform announcement
by Joe Luchtenberg 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

They're calling it BrightStor. Haven't had a chance to look at it in detail yet, but cursory look shows it supports NDMP b/u to direct attached tape library and 3-way filer-to-filer (but apparently not filer to server or ethernet-enabled tape library), as well as supporting EMC TimeFinder, EMC FastTrax and IBM mainframe (3494). http://www.ca.com/press/caworld2001/brightstor/index.htm Any beta-testers/early-adopters? Am looking for a platform with NDMP support that is certified to backup TNG... Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. 757-858-0600 757-285-1223 (mobile) 757-858-0606 (fax) joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com www.data-line.com

1 0

RE: performance data collection
by Witham, John 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

MRTG, Definitely. It's free. There's a Solaris download on NOW, and an NT port floating around. Let me know if you want it. Cheers! -john -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Franey [mailto:KFraney@epnet.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:56 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: performance data collection What's the best way to capture performance data on an f840 in order to examine/analyze how the system is doing? This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

1 0

Process command question on server running HP ux10
by leonard.galinsky＠philips.com 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

When I run the Top Utility on my HP UX 10.20 Box (the rest are 11.0). The command that the process is running is called "basicdsd". It is running continously & growing in size. Any Ideas what "basicdsd" is? Thanks -

2 1

performance data collection
by Kevin Franey 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

What's the best way to capture performance data on an f840 in order to examine/analyze how the system is doing?

1 0

RE: Process command question on server running HP ux10
by Foster, Steven 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

Check this out... http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,1150,0xc2b0e7613948d5118fef00… Steve -----Original Message----- From: leonard.galinsky(a)philips.com [mailto:leonard.galinsky@philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:23 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Process command question on server running HP ux10 When I run the Top Utility on my HP UX 10.20 Box (the rest are 11.0). The command that the process is running is called "basicdsd". It is running continously & growing in size. Any Ideas what "basicdsd" is? Thanks -

1 0

RE: Process command question on server running HP ux10
by Traitel, Eyal 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

The "cdsd" part sounds like a Cadence daemon. I wonder if it's related... Can you post outputs of the ps ? Eyal. -----Original Message----- From: leonard.galinsky(a)philips.com [mailto:leonard.galinsky@philips.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 17:23 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Process command question on server running HP ux10 When I run the Top Utility on my HP UX 10.20 Box (the rest are 11.0). The command that the process is running is called "basicdsd". It is running continously & growing in size. Any Ideas what "basicdsd" is? Thanks -

1 0

RE: Looking for drive space utilization reports
by jeff.mery＠ni.com 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

My team is going to evaluate the BMC product on Thursday this week as part of a larger-scale software evaluation. I'll be sure to pass on what we see. J- |--------+----------------------------> | | Jay Newton | | | <jnewton@chkenergy| | | .com> | | | Sent by: | | | owner-toasters@mat| | | hworks.com | | | | | | | | | 07/09/2001 04:42 | | | PM | | | | |--------+----------------------------> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: "'Jeffrey Krueger'" <jkrueger(a)qualcomm.com>, "Honeycutt, Michael" <MichaelHoneycutt(a)NC.SLR.com> | | cc: "'Coartney, Paul'" <Paul.Coartney(a)netapp.com>, Jay Newton <jnewton(a)chkenergy.com>, "'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" | | <toasters(a)mathworks.com> | | Subject: RE: Looking for drive space utilization reports | >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| I looked real closely at the Highground stuff. There's a module called Prospector that will allow me to do what I need at the file level. I'm afraid that it's going to cost an arm and a leg, though. I haven't looked at BMC too closely yet but I will. Hopefully the price will be more attractive. Thank you all for your input. It has helped tremendously! -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Krueger [mailto:jkrueger@qualcomm.com] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 2:52 PM To: Honeycutt, Michael Cc: 'Coartney, Paul'; 'Jay Newton'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: Looking for drive space utilization reports This is true Michael. DFM is a very nice multi-filer management tool and is tightly integrated with the filers. It has lots of useful reports, especially for multi-filer sites that are trying to find a chunk of free space or figure out how much they can expand certain filers. DFM will not do two of the things Jay asked for though - it will not tell you the type of data using the space, nor will it tell you which users are putting it there. It is more designed to be a multi-filer management tool than a storage management tool. Highground will (somewhat) do what Jay is looking for. He may also consider looking into BMC. They bill their storage management tools as being "Application specific" - that is they have a capability of mapping certain applications (like Oracle) to data usage. Like Highground, BMC has an agent-based architecture; however, I'm not sure of Highground's support for "Tier 1 storage". BMC has agents for monitoring NetApp as well as EMC Symetrix, Hitachi, etc. Good luck Jay! -- Jeff On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 12:02:35PM -0400, Honeycutt, Michael wrote: > The reason I suggested Highground is because it has the ability to monitor > "soft" quotas. It wont enforce quotas on the filer, but it will e-mail users > when they are close to reaching their quota. As far as I know, the Data > Fabric Manager doesnt have this functionality. Is this true or is my mind > clouded from last weeks vacation? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Coartney, Paul [mailto:Paul.Coartney@netapp.com] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:46 AM > To: Honeycutt, Michael; 'Jay Newton'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: RE: Looking for drive space utilization reports > > > NetApp has a new tool called Data Fabric Manager that may fit your > requirements, and is a lot cheaper than highground. You may want to call > your sales rep and get a demo. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Honeycutt, Michael [mailto:MichaelHoneycutt@NC.SLR.com] > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 4:59 AM > To: 'Jay Newton'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: RE: Looking for drive space utilization reports > > > Try this link. http://www.highground.com/ <http://www.highground.com/> > FYI, this company is a subsidary of Sun Microsystems. They can arrange a > free demo if you are interested. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jay Newton [mailto:jnewton@chkenergy.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:28 AM > To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: Looking for drive space utilization reports > > > > I am trying to find a good tool, preferrably Windows-based, that can help me > gather statistics on space utilization. I need this for our F840 Filer we > currently use, but I would like to be able to use it to look at space usage > elsewhere. I'm needing statistics on how much drive space is used, the type > of data using it, and which users are putting it there. > > Anyone out there have any ideas? > > > Jay Newton > Systems Engineer > Chesapeake Operating > 6112-114 > (405)810-2683 > (405)879-9578 fax >

1 0

MSCS Exchange cluster and NetApp CFO cluster
by Joe Luchtenberg 10 Jul '01

10 Jul '01

Anybody out there running Exchange 5.5 on NT 4.0 SP6a with two-node, Active/Passive MSCS cluster and the information store on a NetApp CFO cluster (forgive my multiple instances of redundancy)? According to the documentation for SnapManager 1.1 this is now a supported configuration. Insight/comments/lessons learned greatly appreciated. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. 757.858.0600 757.285.1223 (cell) 757.858.0606 (fax) joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com www.data-line.com

1 0

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters July 2001