Hi All,
Any one knows the pros and cons of OCUM and Zenoss monitoring tool..
just would like to know which is more beneficiaries either using OCUM or Zenoss tool for monitoring..
aiming to configure only netapp storage(C-Mode) not for heterogeneous storage's
Please let us know if anyone's knows more about it, as I am new to Zenoss monitoring Tool.
Regards Yuvaraja
we have both in useocum (plus grafana, which is great), because its from netapp.zenoss, because that is our main monitoring-system. we had severe troubles with zenoss, eg.* whole monitoring suffered from single monitored systems being sometimes unresponsive. there seems to be a queue in zenoss and if something blocks, all checks afterwards get into trouble.* updating was a real pain * zenpack for netapp was not worth it, had troubles to check systems with several thousand qtrees,... yoursjosef On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 20:47 +0530, Yuvaraja Shivaram wrote:
Hi All,
Any one knows the pros and cons of OCUM and Zenoss monitoring tool..
just would like to know which is more beneficiaries either using OCUM or Zenoss tool for monitoring..
aiming to configure only netapp storage(C-Mode) not for heterogeneous storage's
Please let us know if anyone's knows more about it, as I am new to Zenoss monitoring Tool.
Regards Yuvaraja
_______________________________________________Toasters mailing listToasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
If I can add a wildcard to the mix, I use LogicMonitor for my NetApp health/performance monitoring and I'm very happy with it. Lots of pretty graphs and data correlation and you can pull the raw data via API if you want to do something with it locally. It's an expensive service, but IMO worth it.
________________________________________ From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of josef radinger cheese@nosuchhost.net Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 1:13:44 PM To: Yuvaraja Shivaram; toasters Subject: Re: would like to know the prons and cons between OCUM And Zenoss Monitoring tool
we have both in use ocum (plus grafana, which is great), because its from netapp. zenoss, because that is our main monitoring-system.
we had severe troubles with zenoss, eg. * whole monitoring suffered from single monitored systems being sometimes unresponsive. there seems to be a queue in zenoss and if something blocks, all checks afterwards get into trouble. * updating was a real pain * zenpack for netapp was not worth it, had troubles to check systems with several thousand qtrees,...
yours josef
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 20:47 +0530, Yuvaraja Shivaram wrote: Hi All,
Any one knows the pros and cons of OCUM and Zenoss monitoring tool..
just would like to know which is more beneficiaries either using OCUM or Zenoss tool for monitoring..
aiming to configure only netapp storage(C-Mode) not for heterogeneous storage's
Please let us know if anyone's knows more about it, as I am new to Zenoss monitoring Tool.
Regards Yuvaraja
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/hLPLC4xvYxtzl1NnuOZAl_?domain=teaparty.net
http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network.
Sorry for veering off-topic but I’ll second LogicMonitor. We’ve used it happily for years. While it can be pricey on the whole, you pay per monitored host (IP) so you get a heck of a lot of performance data by pointing at a single Cluster mgmt LIF. You also get outstanding value by monitoring a single Xen pool master or vSphere vCenter server where you get plenty of data on the entire hypervisor resource pool and guests.
________________________________ From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of Ian Ehrenwald ian.ehrenwald@hbgusa.com Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 7:57 pm To: josef radinger; Yuvaraja Shivaram; toasters Subject: Re: would like to know the prons and cons between OCUM And Zenoss Monitoring tool
If I can add a wildcard to the mix, I use LogicMonitor for my NetApp health/performance monitoring and I'm very happy with it. Lots of pretty graphs and data correlation and you can pull the raw data via API if you want to do something with it locally. It's an expensive service, but IMO worth it.
________________________________________ From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of josef radinger cheese@nosuchhost.net Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 1:13:44 PM To: Yuvaraja Shivaram; toasters Subject: Re: would like to know the prons and cons between OCUM And Zenoss Monitoring tool
we have both in use ocum (plus grafana, which is great), because its from netapp. zenoss, because that is our main monitoring-system.
we had severe troubles with zenoss, eg. * whole monitoring suffered from single monitored systems being sometimes unresponsive. there seems to be a queue in zenoss and if something blocks, all checks afterwards get into trouble. * updating was a real pain * zenpack for netapp was not worth it, had troubles to check systems with several thousand qtrees,...
yours josef
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 20:47 +0530, Yuvaraja Shivaram wrote: Hi All,
Any one knows the pros and cons of OCUM and Zenoss monitoring tool..
just would like to know which is more beneficiaries either using OCUM or Zenoss tool for monitoring..
aiming to configure only netapp storage(C-Mode) not for heterogeneous storage's
Please let us know if anyone's knows more about it, as I am new to Zenoss monitoring Tool.
Regards Yuvaraja
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/hLPLC4xvYxtzl1NnuOZAl_?domain=teaparty.net
http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network.
_______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
OCUM will do a lot out of the box while the main advantage of zenoss is going to be the ability to customize any kind of monitoring you want and hte single pane. In this case I would use OCUM unless you plan to spend a lot of time looking up things like what OID does what and creating custom graphs.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:23 AM Yuvaraja Shivaram < yuvaraja.kishan@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Any one knows the pros and cons of OCUM and Zenoss monitoring tool..
just would like to know which is more beneficiaries either using OCUM or Zenoss tool for monitoring..
aiming to configure only netapp storage(C-Mode) not for heterogeneous storage's
Please let us know if anyone's knows more about it, as I am new to Zenoss monitoring Tool.
Regards Yuvaraja
Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
-
Ian Ehrenwald -
jordan slingerland -
josef radinger -
Stephen Stocke -
Yuvaraja Shivaram