Chris Thompson cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk writes:
Of course, we are probably still years away from usable client implementations.
I actually doubt that. There's enough interest in NFSv4 that it's likely to take off pretty quickly. Netapp has already done a preliminary implementation (according a paper I found somewhere, written by one of their engineers). Connectathon 2001 was just last weekend, but I don't know what the results of it were...
As to RFC 3010, you'll note the work place of the authors? That might give some clue as to Netapp's plans. And anyway, it's still "standards track" which means it could still change.
Darrell
I actually doubt that. There's enough interest in NFSv4 that it's likely to take off pretty quickly. Netapp has already done a preliminary implementation (according a paper I found somewhere, written by one of their engineers).
Probably
http://www.nfsv4.org/bakeoff/netapp/BakeOff/index.htm
"NFS-v4 Bake-off What I Learned" by Dave Noveck of NetApp. It's dated 26 October 1999, so don't be put off by
http://www.nfsv4.org/bakeoff/netapp/BakeOff/sld004.htm
"What I didn't implement (no time)".
See also
http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/index.html
which is a project we and Sun are sponsoring; they're developing NFSv4 implementations for Linux and OpenBSD. (The OpenBSD one would probably fit into the other BSDs with some work.)