i have filers with ATM interfaces and two ELANS per ATM NIC configured. each of these ELANS is on its own IP network and all the ifconfig info such as netmask and broadcast look fine. each of these interfaces are separatley registered with my naming services and one of them is used for backup only. however, when doing a netstat and looking at the port connections, it appears that some of the traffic from my other networks is going to both interfaces. i am running routed on all filers and have proper default routes set up. the netstat -rn info looks correct as to which interface is getting routed to. i am confused as to why some of these connections in the netstat output appear to be going to my backup network interfaces. does anyone know of any issues with either routed or ATM LANE on the filers that could be causing this?
thanks,
roger
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 12:01:46PM -0400, Leonard, Roger wrote:
i have filers with ATM interfaces and two ELANS per ATM NIC configured. each of these ELANS is on its own IP network however, when doing a netstat and looking at the port connections, it appears that some of the traffic from my other networks is going to both interfaces. does anyone know of any issues with either routed
You haven't given more specific info, hence my guessing:
Machine from network B accesses share from network A via filer interface A, but TCP/IP sees better route (back) to that machine via filer interface B.
p.
-
Leonard, Roger -
Piotr KUCHARSKI