How about letting root delete files that are currently locked open on the NT-side like they can with NFS-locked files?
This is burt 8500. It is fixed in 6.1; in a unix qtree you now get this behavior which is characteristic of Unix semantics. In mixed and ntfs qtrees, NTFS locking semantics still apply.
Alan
=============================================================== Alan G. Yoder agy@netapp.com ===============================================================
----- Original Message ----- From: "Yoder, Alan" alan.yoder@netapp.com To: "'Bruce Sterling Woodcock'" sirbruce@ix.netcom.com; "Muhlestein, Mark" mark.muhlestein@netapp.com; "White, Lance" Lance.White@netapp.com; "'Chuck Ross'" chuck.ross@signiant.com; "Net App List (E-mail)" toasters@mathworks.com Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 9:00 AM Subject: RE: Why is root not root?
How about letting root delete files that are currently locked open on the NT-side like they can with NFS-locked files?
This is burt 8500. It is fixed in 6.1; in a unix qtree you now get this behavior which is characteristic of Unix semantics. In mixed and ntfs qtrees, NTFS locking semantics still apply.
Does cifs.nfs_root_ignore_acl apply to all types of qtrees?
If so then why not a cifs.nfs_root_ignore_locks option?
Bruce
-
Bruce Sterling Woodcock -
Yoder, Alan