Hello All, NetApp is planning to enhance the SNMP support in the filer in an upcoming release of the OS. Due to some risk factors, I'd rather not promise that it will be the next major release (next year), but that is the current plan.
Things we definitely plan to do when this support is added: (a) GETs for general CIFS-related filer parameters. (b) GETs for statistics on all SMB requests, both cumulative and per client. (c) Generic TRAP support, with settings and parameters for each available trap manageable through Filerview.
I would welcome feedback on: (a) Additional GETs you think are necessary. (b) Trap support considerations. (b) Specific traps you think should be implemented. (d) Other things pertaining to SNMP that would be helpful.
It would help us if you could indicate the relative importance-- to your company's future infrastructure plans--of things that you suggest.
Thanks,
Alan
--------------------------------------------------------------- Alan G. Yoder agy@netapp.com Network Appliance, Inc. 2770 San Tomas Expressway voice 408-367-3031 Santa Clara, CA 95051 fax 408-367-3451 ---------------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
I have a suggestion, but its got nothing to do with snmp. As a new netapps user, I am a bit dismayed about the fact that quotas can only be set at the top level of a tree. eg. you can't do
quota qtree
then
mkdir /tree/branch1 mkdir /tree/branch2
then edit the quotas file to say :
/tree/branch1 tree 2G /tree/branch2 tree 2G
I don't know about anyone else, but I would be really grateful if this would work in the next release.
:(
agy wrote:
Hello All, NetApp is planning to enhance the SNMP support in the filer in an upcoming release of the OS. Due to some risk factors, I'd rather not promise that it will be the next major release (next year), but that is the current plan.
Things we definitely plan to do when this support is added: (a) GETs for general CIFS-related filer parameters. (b) GETs for statistics on all SMB requests, both cumulative and per client. (c) Generic TRAP support, with settings and parameters for each available trap manageable through Filerview.
I would welcome feedback on: (a) Additional GETs you think are necessary. (b) Trap support considerations. (b) Specific traps you think should be implemented. (d) Other things pertaining to SNMP that would be helpful.
It would help us if you could indicate the relative importance-- to your company's future infrastructure plans--of things that you suggest.
Thanks,
Alan
Alan G. Yoder agy@netapp.com Network Appliance, Inc. 2770 San Tomas Expressway voice 408-367-3031 Santa Clara, CA 95051 fax 408-367-3451
Raymond,
I'm afraid I can't solve the problem, but I can help you with the syntax:
To create a qtree at /branch1, do the following:
quota qtree branch1
The process you described below would not create a qtree, only a directory.
Regards, Andrew
At 08:24 am 03-07-98 +0100, you wrote:
Hello,
I have a suggestion, but its got nothing to do with snmp. As a new netapps user, I am a bit dismayed about the fact that quotas can only be set at the top level of a tree. eg. you can't do
quota qtree
then
mkdir /tree/branch1 mkdir /tree/branch2
then edit the quotas file to say :
/tree/branch1 tree 2G /tree/branch2 tree 2G
I don't know about anyone else, but I would be really grateful if this would work in the next release.
:(
agy wrote:
Hello All, NetApp is planning to enhance the SNMP support in the filer in an upcoming release of the OS. Due to some risk factors, I'd rather not promise that it will be the next major release (next year), but that is the current plan.
Things we definitely plan to do when this support is added: (a) GETs for general CIFS-related filer parameters. (b) GETs for statistics on all SMB requests, both cumulative and per client. (c) Generic TRAP support, with settings and parameters for each available trap manageable through Filerview.
I would welcome feedback on: (a) Additional GETs you think are necessary. (b) Trap support considerations. (b) Specific traps you think should be implemented. (d) Other things pertaining to SNMP that would be helpful.
It would help us if you could indicate the relative importance-- to your company's future infrastructure plans--of things that you suggest.
Thanks,
Alan
Alan G. Yoder agy@netapp.com Network Appliance, Inc. 2770 San Tomas Expressway voice 408-367-3031 Santa Clara, CA 95051 fax 408-367-3451
-
agy -
Andrew Bond -
Raymond Brennan