On 03/12/98 23:39:54 you wrote:
I can sympathize. I'm sure everyone here does. We've ALL been there. :) And I'm not trying to start that tired old UNIX vs. NT argument. There are circumstances where NT is a fine solution. All I'm saying is that if the application isn't up to your needs, perhaps one should consider a different application. (And if that means a different platform, then you have reason to question NT in the first place.)
I wouldn't be surprised if IIS/FrontPage have the same troubles over NFS on NT, but I confess I don't know for certain as I've never tried it.
Bruce
+--- In a previous state of mind, sirbruce@ix.netcom.com wrote: | | >Writing our own software to | >do that would take a lot longer than buying an off-the-shelf product. | >Maybe we'll go with FrontPage with Apache on Solaris, or perhaps we'll | >find that NFS on NT with the Netapp does the job for us. | | I wouldn't be surprised if IIS/FrontPage have the same troubles over NFS | on NT, but I confess I don't know for certain as I've never tried it.
I know a few different folks that have done this (apache+fp extensions over nfs) and it worked for them. YMMV.
Let us know if it works and if you had to make any significant changes. Good luck.
Alexei
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Alexei Rodriguez wrote:
I know a few different folks that have done this (apache+fp extensions over nfs) and it worked for them. YMMV.
That's another approach we can take, but since IIS is the only Microsoft component left in the equation, Microsoft probably won't like that much (this hosting agreement is part of a larger deal between our two companies). ;-)
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Alexei Rodriguez wrote:
I know a few different folks that have done this (apache+fp extensions over nfs) and it worked for them. YMMV.
BTW, can anyone recommend an NFS client package for NT? Our NT guy is looking around at different vendors right now, and I'm not familiar with that particular software market.