Brian,
Those numbers are deemed NetApp Internal Only - though I believe that Sales can share some info with you.
However this might help: a FAS270c is equivalent to a NetApp F840 system with respect to throughput\horsepower. Maybe just a tad faster even.
Glenn
-----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Brian Pascal Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 1:37 AM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Maximum throughput of a FAS270c
Does any one has an idea of what is the maximum throughput of a FAS270c system? (Sustained system bandwidth & IOPS)
Thanks, Brian.
This Mail Has Been Scanned For Virus By Scanmail For Lotus Notes Enterprise/Kbsl
You might also find some numbers published at www.spec.org.
Re:
Subject: RE: Maximum throughput of a FAS270c Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 07:57:36 -0400 From: "Glenn Walker" ggwalker@mindspring.com To: "Brian Pascal" brian@kbsl.lk, toasters@mathworks.com
Brian,
Those numbers are deemed NetApp Internal Only - though I believe that Sales can share some info with you.
However this might help: a FAS270c is equivalent to a NetApp F840 system with respect to throughput\horsepower. Maybe just a tad faster even.
Glenn
-----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Brian Pascal Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 1:37 AM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Maximum throughput of a FAS270c
Does any one has an idea of what is the maximum throughput of a FAS270c system? (Sustained system bandwidth & IOPS)
Thanks, Brian.
This Mail Has Been Scanned For Virus By Scanmail For Lotus Notes Enterprise/Kbsl
http://www.spec.org/sfs97r1/results/res2004q2/sfs97r1-20040525-00186.html
On 10/3/06, Glenn Walker ggwalker@mindspring.com wrote: Brian,
Those numbers are deemed NetApp Internal Only - though I believe that Sales can share some info with you.
However this might help: a FAS270c is equivalent to a NetApp F840 system with respect to throughputhorsepower. Maybe just a tad faster even.
Glenn
-----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Brian Pascal Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 1:37 AM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Maximum throughput of a FAS270c
Does any one has an idea of what is the maximum throughput of a FAS270c system? (Sustained system bandwidth & IOPS)
Thanks, Brian.
This Mail Has Been Scanned For Virus By Scanmail For Lotus Notes Enterprise/Kbsl
"Grey" == Grey Friday grey.friday@gmail.com writes:
Grey> http://www.spec.org/sfs97r1/results/res2004q2/sfs97r1-20040525-00186.html Grey> On 10/3/06, Glenn Walker ggwalker@mindspring.com wrote: Grey> Brian,
Those numbers are deemed NetApp Internal Only - though I believe that Sales can share some info with you.
However this might help: a FAS270c is equivalent to a NetApp F840 system with respect to throughputhorsepower. Maybe just a tad faster even.
Glenn,
Just to be sure, you're talking about an F840 is roughtly equivilent to an FAS270, right? Not an F940?
John
I'd say an F840 (I think that's what Glenn was suggesting). The 270 is an op limited machine. Dual core 650Mhz processor, and a gig of ram (subtract 256 for NVMEM) and you get a pretty limited box in terms of performance.
A 940 has a 1.8 ghz proc 4 or so gigs of memory, and a dedicated nvram card. Much better performance box. But a 270 wasn't marketed as a very fast box, but a very small, cheap box for small & remote offices.
-Blake
On 10/4/06, John Stoffel john.stoffel@taec.toshiba.com wrote:
"Grey" == Grey Friday grey.friday@gmail.com writes:
Grey> http://www.spec.org/sfs97r1/results/res2004q2/sfs97r1-20040525-00186.html Grey> On 10/3/06, Glenn Walker ggwalker@mindspring.com wrote: Grey> Brian,
Those numbers are deemed NetApp Internal Only - though I believe that Sales can share some info with you.
However this might help: a FAS270c is equivalent to a NetApp F840 system with respect to throughputhorsepower. Maybe just a tad faster even.
Glenn,
Just to be sure, you're talking about an F840 is roughtly equivilent to an FAS270, right? Not an F940?
John
Thanks Blake, that's what I mostly thought, but I wanted to confirm.
John
-
Blake Golliher -
Brian Parent -
Glenn Walker -
Grey Friday -
John Stoffel