---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Steven Boyer" Steven.Boyer@gd-wts-centcom.com Reply-To: Steven.Boyer@gd-wts-centcom.com Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 23:20:44 -0600
T1 is a 1M pipe? looking for close to that
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Mohler, Jeff" jeff.mohler@netapp.com Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 21:18:01 -0800
160Kb/sec is pretty much a full-up T1.
What were you expecting?
-----Original Message----- From: Steven Boyer [mailto:Steven.Boyer@gd-wts-centcom.com] Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 8:45 PM To: toasters Subject:
I am using snapmirror over a T1 to transfer to volumes between a 760 and an 840 both running 6.1.1.r2. The 760 is GigE and the 840 is 10/100, when I look at sysstat I am only getting about 160kbs. Is any else seeing these type of results with snapmirror over a T1. If not any ideas on increasing transfer rate of the snapmirror.
Thanks
-- Steven N. Boyer UNIX/NT/NetApp Support HQUSCENTCOM General Dynamics --
-- Steven N. Boyer UNIX/NT/NetApp Support HQUSCENTCOM General Dynamics --
-- Steven N. Boyer UNIX/NT/NetApp Support HQUSCENTCOM General Dynamics --
T1 is a 1M pipe? looking for close to that
No, its a 1.554mbit/sec pipe. 160kbyte/s is about as good as you can expect. NetApp may not always implement customer feature requests right away, but I think even the most demanding of us can't expect them to give us more than 24 64kbit timeslots on a t1.
..kg..
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:54:07AM -0500, kevin graham wrote:
T1 is a 1M pipe? looking for close to that
No, its a 1.554mbit/sec pipe. 160kbyte/s is about as good as you can expect. NetApp may not always implement customer feature requests right away, but I think even the most demanding of us can't expect them to give us more than 24 64kbit timeslots on a t1.
..kg..
On a similar note, I'm doing a baseline snapmirror between 2 non-busy filers on the same 1Gb backbone. I'm only seeing 17.5Mb/s = 140mb/s. Looks slow to me. Any idea?
Thanks
Igor