I agree. I also make my living selling NetApps right here in Taiwan.
However, maybe the scenario is true for North America market. But in Taiwan, or the whole Asia market, USD$300,000 as the entrance price is TOO ridiculous. People will buy high performance filers with this price, but not for some IDE disks assembled, low- performance nearline filers. If they want to compete with other nearline storage devices in this market, they should set the entrance lower. I think I can persuade my clients to spend USD$100,000 for a NearStore with 4TB capacity, but not a USD$300,000 12TB NearStore. Why not let customers choose the capacity and price tag they want?
*Sigh*
Regards, -- Allen TK. Chang Syscape Tech
-----Original Message----- From: Joe Luchtenberg Sent: 2002/3/22 To: toasters@mathworks.com mailto:toasters@mathworks.com Cc: Subject: RE: R100 Price?
No error. Note that this price is for 12TB raw (that's the cost to get into the NearStore dance). Well under $0.03 per raw MB (NetApp promotional materials cite $0.02, but I think that's just for the h/w - list price is $275K for the base 12TB system). That's a whole bunch less than a filer -- an F840c or F880c at 12TB will run you 2.5-3x more, and multiple smaller filers even more than that. Of course, the NearStore isn't meant to replace production filers. You're right to make the comparison to other nearline storage devices, and that's where NetApp has to sell its value proposition. I.e. integration with other filers (SnapMirror, SnapVault, SnapRestore), snapshot technology, no latency (compared to libraries w/ media pickers), universal access, better reliability, etc... Other disk-based nearline products are rushing to market now, too. Some are simply repackaged low-end NAS being repositioned to grab some market share. Others may be real players. However, I don't think there's another vendor going this aggressively into the nearline market space that has the comprehensive solution and integration across the enterprise that you can get with NetApp, though. Of course I'm a little biased, since I make some of my living selling these things. :-] Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. Email: joe.luchtenberg@data-line.com Phone: 757-457-0504 (direct line) 757-858-0600 (front desk) 757-285-1223 (mobile) Fax: 757-858-0606 Please visit us at www.data-line.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Allen_Chang@syscape.com.tw [ mailto:Allen_Chang@syscape.com.tw] > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:51 AM > To: toasters@mathworks.com > Subject: R100 Price? > > > > From what I heard from NetApp sales and managers for the past few > months, it seems the new NearStore product line will be a > cost-effective, > low-performance, large capacity filer designated for > near-line storage. > > However, I just downloaded the newest Quoter from the NOW site. > The new Quoter indicated that an R100-12TB preconfigured is priced > for nearly USD$330,000(Wow!!!). Is this an error of the new Quoter? > Or, NetApp executives really think they can use this AMAZING > price to compete with other nearline storage devices? > > *Sigh* > > > Regards, > -- > Allen TK. Chang > Project Manager > allen_chang@syscape.com.tw > Syscape Technology > > >
Does anyone know if details of the R100's architecture are available? Not having the budget to buy one at any price, and info on the site relgated to marketing babble, I'm relegated to staring at the pics, and it seems there's about 1RU on each shelf above the disks. Given that it's IDE-based, it makes sense that the controllers would live there, but what interface is used on the host-side (FCAL?)?
Given a necessity to move the controller closer to the disks, are there more interesting things going on w/ a RAID controller on the shelf ala the company that rhymes with ZooArk? Since alot of the capacity claims on the traditional filers derives from grossly overloading the bus (ie. 3 DS14's on a loop), something like this might be promising.....
just curious.
..kg..