I have both my ports on a linkswitch 3000, at 100mb, full-duplex.
Both ends are configured manually for 100mit, full duplex.
I do not believe when i was running 4.3.4, that I got any errors. But now, with 5.3, I'm seeing occasional errors. (a few every 10-15 seconds).
In this VLAN, there's only 1 other device talking to the netapp, and it's configure for 100mb, full-duplex as well, and it sees no errors either coming or going.
As I said, I believe this is new behaviour. I have rebooted everything just to make sure, and double checked it all, and it's all full duplex 100mbit.
Cabling is short, and tests fine on a Fluke 682 lan meter...
Anybody else seeing something similar before I go knocking on Netapps door?
netstat -I e10 -i 1 increments in the errors column...
na-filer-1> netstat -I e10 -i 1 input (e10) output input (Total) output packets errs packets errs colls packets errs packets errs colls 21581774 7745 10630428 3192 0 27004107 7745 17143252 7320 0 6999 0 1330 0 0 7008 0 1374 0 0 2844 14 471 0 0 2883 14 592 0 0 4996 4 853 0 0 5004 4 886 0 0 4544 0 867 0 0 4554 0 917 0 0 3199 12 564 0 0 3220 12 661 0 0 6991 0 1235 0 0 7002 0 1281 0 0 2848 0 689 0 0 2860 0 761 0 0 4708 6 904 0 0 4715 6 932 0 0 6331 0 1207 0 0 6343 0 1269 0 0 2332 6 465 0 0 2360 6 540 0 0
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 tkaczma@gryf.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
I do not believe when i was running 4.3.4, that I got any errors. But now, with 5.3, I'm seeing occasional errors. (a few every 10-15 seconds).
It would help if you'd share the kinds of errors are you receiving.
Tom
Something else that would be nice to see is "ifstat e10" And: are you forcing full duplex *on both ends* or are you doing auto *on both ends*
--tmac
Timothy A. McCarthy --> System Engineer, Eastern Region. Network Appliance http://www.netapp.com 301-230-5847 Office \ / Page Me at:@@ 301-230-5852 Fax / 800-654-9619
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
netstat -I e10 -i 1 increments in the errors column...
na-filer-1> netstat -I e10 -i 1 input (e10) output input (Total) output packets errs packets errs colls packets errs packets errs colls 21581774 7745 10630428 3192 0 27004107 7745 17143252 7320 0 6999 0 1330 0 0 7008 0 1374 0 0 2844 14 471 0 0 2883 14 592 0 0 4996 4 853 0 0 5004 4 886 0 0 4544 0 867 0 0 4554 0 917 0 0 3199 12 564 0 0 3220 12 661 0 0 6991 0 1235 0 0 7002 0 1281 0 0 2848 0 689 0 0 2860 0 761 0 0 4708 6 904 0 0 4715 6 932 0 0 6331 0 1207 0 0 6343 0 1269 0 0 2332 6 465 0 0 2360 6 540 0 0
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 tkaczma@gryf.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
I do not believe when i was running 4.3.4, that I got any errors. But now, with 5.3, I'm seeing occasional errors. (a few every 10-15 seconds).
It would help if you'd share the kinds of errors are you receiving.
Tom
I force full duplex in the switch, and the netapp is set for 100-tx-fd...
I'll get an ifstat and send it on.
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Tim McCarthy wrote:
Something else that would be nice to see is "ifstat e10" And: are you forcing full duplex *on both ends* or are you doing auto *on both ends*
--tmac
Timothy A. McCarthy --> System Engineer, Eastern Region. Network Appliance http://www.netapp.com 301-230-5847 Office \ / Page Me at:@@ 301-230-5852 Fax / 800-654-9619
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
netstat -I e10 -i 1 increments in the errors column...
na-filer-1> netstat -I e10 -i 1 input (e10) output input (Total) output packets errs packets errs colls packets errs packets errs colls 21581774 7745 10630428 3192 0 27004107 7745 17143252 7320 0 6999 0 1330 0 0 7008 0 1374 0 0 2844 14 471 0 0 2883 14 592 0 0 4996 4 853 0 0 5004 4 886 0 0 4544 0 867 0 0 4554 0 917 0 0 3199 12 564 0 0 3220 12 661 0 0 6991 0 1235 0 0 7002 0 1281 0 0 2848 0 689 0 0 2860 0 761 0 0 4708 6 904 0 0 4715 6 932 0 0 6331 0 1207 0 0 6343 0 1269 0 0 2332 6 465 0 0 2360 6 540 0 0
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 tkaczma@gryf.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
I do not believe when i was running 4.3.4, that I got any errors. But now, with 5.3, I'm seeing occasional errors. (a few every 10-15 seconds).
It would help if you'd share the kinds of errors are you receiving.
Tom
This is the ifstat:
na-filer-1> ifstat e10 e10: MAC address 00:c0:95:f8:43:63
RECEIVE Packets: 51680k | Bytes: 1491m | Errors: 24853 No buffers: 0 | Length err: 0 | Runt frames: 0 Long frames: 0 | Collisions: 0 | CRC error: 0 H/w overflow: 24853 | Process stop: 5367 | List overflow: 0 Process reset: 5367 | Rst frame drops: 0 TRANSMIT Packets: 22559k | Bytes: 3805m | Errors: 8701 Collisions: 0 | Late collisions: 0 | Excess coll: 0 Queue full: 0 | List full: 0 | No carrier: 0 Underflow: 8323 | Defer: 0 | Time out: 0 Stopped: 0 | List underflow: 4669 | Loss of carrier: 0 No buffers: 0 | Requeue: 1450 | Threshold up: 1450 Threshold dn: 1448 | Threshold lvl: 2 DEVICE Interrupts: 48189k | Resets: 5 LINK INFO Auto: Disabled | Mediatype: 100tx-fd | Link Partner: Unknown | Link State: Up
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Tim McCarthy wrote:
Something else that would be nice to see is "ifstat e10" And: are you forcing full duplex *on both ends* or are you doing auto *on both ends*
--tmac
Timothy A. McCarthy --> System Engineer, Eastern Region. Network Appliance http://www.netapp.com 301-230-5847 Office \ / Page Me at:@@ 301-230-5852 Fax / 800-654-9619
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
netstat -I e10 -i 1 increments in the errors column...
na-filer-1> netstat -I e10 -i 1 input (e10) output input (Total) output packets errs packets errs colls packets errs packets errs colls 21581774 7745 10630428 3192 0 27004107 7745 17143252 7320 0 6999 0 1330 0 0 7008 0 1374 0 0 2844 14 471 0 0 2883 14 592 0 0 4996 4 853 0 0 5004 4 886 0 0 4544 0 867 0 0 4554 0 917 0 0 3199 12 564 0 0 3220 12 661 0 0 6991 0 1235 0 0 7002 0 1281 0 0 2848 0 689 0 0 2860 0 761 0 0 4708 6 904 0 0 4715 6 932 0 0 6331 0 1207 0 0 6343 0 1269 0 0 2332 6 465 0 0 2360 6 540 0 0
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999 tkaczma@gryf.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
I do not believe when i was running 4.3.4, that I got any errors. But now, with 5.3, I'm seeing occasional errors. (a few every 10-15 seconds).
It would help if you'd share the kinds of errors are you receiving.
Tom