I would like access as well.
Regards, Bill
-----Original Message----- From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of toasters-request@teaparty.net Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 5:49 AM To: toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Toasters Digest, Vol 48, Issue 70
Send Toasters mailing list submissions to toasters@teaparty.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to toasters-request@teaparty.net
You can reach the person managing the list at toasters-owner@teaparty.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Toasters digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Deleted Performance Manager (Bachman, Philip) 2. Re: Deleted Performance Manager (John Stoffel) 3. Re: Deleted Performance Manager (John Stoffel) 4. fsecurity job monitoring. (Jeff Cleverley) 5. I've created a slack chat for Netapp users (Basil) 6. Re: I've created a slack chat for Netapp users (Tony Bar) 7. Re: I've created a slack chat for Netapp users (Ed Morgan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:39:41 +0000 From: "Bachman, Philip" Philip.Bachman@netapp.com To: John Stoffel john@stoffel.org Cc: "toasters@teaparty.net" toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Re: Deleted Performance Manager Message-ID: C90B474F-1E25-4677-91E9-07F4C2665692@netapp.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
John,
Sounds like you are still running 1.1 or 1.0. Upgrade to 2.0RC1, currently posted on the NetApp support site and you will find the drill up/drill down you are looking for.
-Phil
Philip Bachman Consulting Systems Engineer Storage Management Solutions
NetApp (908) 420-7800 philip.bachman@netapp.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2015, at 8:15 AM, John Stoffel john@stoffel.org wrote:
So has anyone actually found a good use for performance manager? I'm running the latest version against a fairly busy but unbalanced two node cluster and I keep getting frustrated that I can't drill down or move up to get a better overview of things.
I *know* I've got some performance and space issues, but I'd like to be able to see the overall system state and then drill down into things so I understand them better before I make changes or try to fix stuff.
Maybe I'm just not using it right, wouldn't be the first time...
John _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:14:17 -0400 From: "John Stoffel" john@stoffel.org To: Matthew Kleifgen matthew.kleifgen@rackspace.com Cc: "toasters@teaparty.net" toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Re: Deleted Performance Manager Message-ID: 21942.29945.566566.676308@quad.stoffel.home Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Matthew> If you missed it, there was a release on Friday of 2.0RC1. I Matthew> upgraded the 1.1 vsphere version I was using, and I?m very Matthew> impressed with the new version. Instead of having to search Matthew> for only a few object types, the new version has drill down Matthew> from the cluster level and data on lifs, ports, nodes, etc. Matthew> The upgrade was basically painless, also.
Totally missed it... now I'll be doing an upgrade on this as well to see how it is improved. It can't get much worse in my book...
John
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 22:12:53 -0400 From: "John Stoffel" john@stoffel.org To: "Waltham, Christopher" Christopher.Waltham@netapp.com Cc: "toasters@teaparty.net" toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Re: Deleted Performance Manager Message-ID: 21942.58661.533816.429159@quad.stoffel.home Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
I've done the upgrade to v2.0RC1 and it's *much* more useful. The upgrade was easy, esp since I only had a week or so's worth of data to convert and upgrade. Still not ideal... I semi wish there was more of a 'top' command.
I have used 'qos statistics workload performance show' but it has a bug where you can't see the volume names because they're truncated, which makes it difficult to use. And it doesn't pay attention to the width of the terminal...
And you can refresh the display nicely too. But I can't figure out how to widen some of the columns without doing something like:
set -showseperator " : "
but that still doesn't work properly, the various fields are truncated in 8.2.3P2, though it's also useful to look at
statistics show-periodic
but it's still not quite there in my mind.
Christopher> If you're still on OPM 1.0, upgrading to 1.1 and then to Christopher> 2.0 RC is a little easier than going to 2.0 directly.
Christopher> From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of Matthew Christopher> Kleifgen < matthew.kleifgen@rackspace.com> Christopher> Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 at 8:54 AM Christopher> To: Basil basilberntsen@gmail.com, John Stoffel Christopher> john@stoffel.org Christopher> Cc: "toasters@teaparty.net" toasters@teaparty.net Christopher> Subject: Re: Deleted Performance Manager
Christopher> If you missed it, there was a release on Friday of 2.0RC1. I upgraded the 1.1 vsphere version Christopher> I was using, and I?m very impressed with the new version. Instead of having to search for Christopher> only a few object types, the new version has drill down from the cluster level and data on Christopher> lifs, ports, nodes, etc. The upgrade was basically painless, also.
Christopher> -- Christopher> Matt Kleifgen
Christopher> From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of Basil basilberntsen@gmail.com Christopher> Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 at 7:35 AM Christopher> To: John Stoffel john@stoffel.org Christopher> Cc: "toasters@teaparty.net" toasters@teaparty.net Christopher> Subject: Re: Deleted Performance Manager
Christopher> No, it's barely functional. It's got a lot of promise, but lacks some very basic features I'd Christopher> have expected in 1.0. Storage performance management is the achilles heel of most storage Christopher> vendors, and this is no exception. I hope Netapp will put together some sort of focus group to Christopher> guide the next few iterations. It really does have promise- of all the useless performance Christopher> applications I've used, this one does the coolest useless tricks... like their algorithm for Christopher> determining bully volumes and telling you which layer the problem is at.
Christopher> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:14 AM, John Stoffel john@stoffel.org wrote:
Christopher> So has anyone actually found a good use for performance manager? I'm Christopher> running the latest version against a fairly busy but unbalanced two Christopher> node cluster and I keep getting frustrated that I can't drill down or Christopher> move up to get a better overview of things.
Christopher> I *know* I've got some performance and space issues, but I'd like to Christopher> be able to see the overall system state and then drill down into Christopher> things so I understand them better before I make changes or try to fix Christopher> stuff.
Christopher> Maybe I'm just not using it right, wouldn't be the first time...
Christopher> John Christopher> _______________________________________________ Christopher> Toasters mailing list Christopher> Toasters@teaparty.net Christopher> http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
------------------------------
Message: 4 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:00:47 -0600 From: Jeff Cleverley jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com To: "Toasters@teaparty.net" Toasters@teaparty.net Subject: fsecurity job monitoring. Message-ID: CAANBop2m_QLh=pTHZ+Ctgrg8OJWgmgFLFw_q_7rfFwAQEB0-Xw@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Greetings,
We have a filer running 7.3.7P1 and we had to run fsecurity to correct permissions/ownership of a tree. Is there any way to see anything to check the progress, see what path it is updating, etc?
We have no idea how long this job will take and it would be nice if there was something showing what it was doing.
Thanks,
Jeff
-
Woods, Bill