: The [miscGlobalStatus] MIB description is a little woolly however :
: Is there a more detailed explanation of what event will : trigger what status?
We were intentionally vague in describing the status, to allow us the flexibility to change the algorithm in future releases.
The current algorithm is to report "critical" if there are any failed fans, power supplies, or if the chassis temperature is too hot. It reports "nonCritical" if there are any failed disks, or if any volume is 99% full.
: However, when doing : the same power supply pull, we only get a message in the : 'info' file.
I filed a bug report (14576) on this one. Power supply failures are more serious than "info"; we need both to get the severity right, and to make it consistent across the various flavors of reporting.
Hi all -
I suddenly have the task of re-architecting our back end network, upon which our Netapp 720 (Quad port NIC + single port NIC) sits.
Considering the broken autonegotiation and general testiness about network conditions Netapps seem to have, I thought I'd check and see if anyone else is using my favorite so far, the Cisco Catalyst 2940. If so, any problems or considerations?
Thanks.
-j
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
Considering the broken autonegotiation and general testiness about network conditions Netapps seem to have, I thought I'd check and see if anyone else is using my favorite so far, the Cisco Catalyst 2940. If so, any problems or considerations?
We have several NetApp creatures and some of them are connected to a Cisco Catalyst 5000, and some to a Cisco Catalyst 2924. No problems with 5000, but 2924 uncovered a bug that generated some (0.0017%) CRC errors on the NetApps. Got an upgrade from Cisco, and it is now Ok.
Regards Elena
What version did you have to upgrade to?
At 5:43 pm +0200 6/5/99, Elena Samsonova wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
Considering the broken autonegotiation and general testiness about network conditions Netapps seem to have, I thought I'd check and see if anyone else is using my favorite so far, the Cisco Catalyst 2940. If so, any problems or considerations?
We have several NetApp creatures and some of them are connected to a Cisco Catalyst 5000, and some to a Cisco Catalyst 2924. No problems with 5000, but 2924 uncovered a bug that generated some (0.0017%) CRC errors on the NetApps. Got an upgrade from Cisco, and it is now Ok.
Regards Elena
Alex
"I'm of the belief that you don't want to talk to your refrigerator."
Intel chairman Andy Grove, 14 April 1999