Anyone see any issues with having your production volumes and your root volume on the same aggregate. I assume there is no issue, but wanted to get input before I go where I can't go back.
Jerry
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Jerry:
As long as the root is in its own flexvol within the aggregate, it's perfectly fine.
Kevin H. Schoener Lynx Technologies Inc.
KHSchoener@LynxTechnologies.NET http://www.LynxTechnologies.NET/
1576 Sweet Home Rd Suite 230C Amherst, NY 14228 716.636.5470 866.316.8599 fax 716.998.6065 cell
-----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 9:13 PM To: list toasters Subject: root volume / flexvol / aggregate
Anyone see any issues with having your production volumes and your root volume on the same aggregate. I assume there is no issue, but wanted to get input before I go where I can't go back.
Jerry
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
It's a common concern I hear from DBA's. They worry that the extra IO from the root volume can rob io's from the data volumes. But except for the sysloging, there's not a lot of activity on the root volume. As long as you have a large enough aggregate, in terms of IO's, then you should be fine. I've never heard of a problem either, which makes sense.
-Blake
On 1/22/06, Jerry juanino@yahoo.com wrote:
Anyone see any issues with having your production volumes and your root volume on the same aggregate. I assume there is no issue, but wanted to get input before I go where I can't go back.
Jerry
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
-
Blake Golliher -
Jerry -
Kevin H. Schoener