>>> Dave Hitz hitz@netapp.com 02/24 9:32 AM >>> >> To open a real can-of-worms, what would people on this list like to see in >> a low-end product offering? (Sub-$10k chassis). >This hypothetical discussion would be of great interest to me. :-)
A bit like the Auspex 4Front AS100 / AS200 perchance? I just attended a presentation in London, and it looks like they've finally woken up to the low end of the market.
Having used & administered Auspex and NetApp personally, it'll be interesting to see what happens in the next year...
-- \|||// Minds are like parachutes; (@ @) They only work when open. *---oOO-(_)-OOo------------------------------------* * Michael Thomson Email: mt53590@ggr.co.uk * * Unix Specialist Internal: 782 2369 * * Glaxo Wellcome External: 01438 762 369 * * Stevenage, UK Fax: 01438 762 461 * * .oooO Oooo. Mobile: 0498 725 047 * *--( )---( )-----------------------------------* \ ( ) / (Quote: Sir James Dewar) _) (_/
>>> Dave Hitz hitz@netapp.com 02/24 9:32 AM >>>
To open a real can-of-worms, what would people on this list like
to see in
a low-end product offering? (Sub-$10k chassis).
This hypothetical discussion would be of great interest to me. :-)
A bit like the Auspex 4Front AS100 / AS200 perchance? I just attended a presentation in London, and it looks like they've finally woken up to the low end of the market.
Having used & administered Auspex and NetApp personally, it'll be interesting to see what happens in the next year...
I have also used and administered both. For ease of use and configurability, my vote is for NetApps. However, for stability and overall quality, I'm afraid I vote for Auspex. What was the 4Front presentation like ?
-
Raymond Brennan -
Thomson, Michael (UK, GIS ISM Group for R&D)