Ever come across this? That's a whole lot of reads and writes in one second! All other numbers seem accurate, but those Disk read and kB/s write numbers are absurd.
CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out 56% 11041 843 0 11926 48613 42164 571755764 5350017024 0 0 1 94% 100% :v 100% 12 0 30 0 0 655 647 66% 5655 943 0 6612 38929 30760 39402 62888 0 0 1 98% 97% Hs 100% 3 0 11 0 0 53 375 52% 4508 419 0 4992 37034 23069 36347 92920 0 0 1 97% 100% :f 100% 19 0 46 0 0 842 800
CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out 33% 1716 1830 0 3805 5017 34051 26328 43388 0 0 53s 96% 100% :f 24% 0 0 259 0 0 36 7332 42% 9556 1372 0 11483 10188 18549 21440 23824 0 0 53s 96% 100% :v 35% 7 0 548 0 0 307 8364 40% 3067 1878 0 6167 11743 38513 36296 68 0 0 53s 95% 5% : 47% 3 0 1219 0 0 803 14610 35% 1764 1664 0 4289 16814 38170 48450 0 0 0 57s 94% 0% - 59% 6 0 855 0 0 392 11342 35% 3068 931 0 4669 15851 52406 6530898751 4766869982 0 0 55s 95% 0% - 58% 12 0 658 0 0 17 9101 27% 3008 928 0 4263 14336 54182 60996 0 0 0 55s 94% 0% - 64% 3 0 324 0 0 0 9834
53% 4781 3550 0 8356 37070 56790 57780 15816 0 0 1s 96% 40% : 93% 0 0 25 0 0 135 541 72% 6323 1761 0 8095 42569 22303 75804 100132 0 0 0s 96% 76% Hf 91% 0 0 11 0 0 163 16 56% 11134 3358 0 14525 35197 22982 6598065628 4808667416 0 0 0s 93% 100% :f 73% 20 0 13 0 0 70 0 79% 10695 2746 0 13449 112103 17847 74439 96096 0 0 0s 96% 78% Hq 89% 3 0 5 0 0 17 0 84% 9690 2643 0 12438 91183 26266 82004 162335 0 0 42s 96% 100% Hn 100% 11 0 94 0 0 979 726 77% 10334 5223 0 15659 92746 28877 51385 107409 0 0 42s 96% 99% : 100% 88 0 14 0 0 7 74
CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out 56% 7776 5374 0 13736 12413 20623 40795 70765 0 0 1 97% 100% :f 46% 7 0 579 0 0 258 4419 48% 9344 3753 0 13575 12647 50606 37204 35308 0 0 1 97% 61% : 46% 0 0 478 0 0 10 4063 38% 9098 2426 0 12015 11441 29765 17704 0 0 0 1 97% 0% - 74% 0 0 491 0 0 279 4137 48% 10616 2339 0 13448 13008 41186 6618900600 4809364036 0 0 1 97% 0% - 68% 15 0 478 0 0 49 3924 50% 13892 1838 0 15995 12338 50661 41572 24 0 0 1 97% 0% - 76% 3 0 262 0 0 123 2077
Is that at default intervals?
On 02/26/2013 01:37 PM, Scott Eno wrote:
Ever come across this? That's a whole lot of reads and writes in one second! All other numbers seem accurate, but those Disk read and kB/s write numbers are absurd.
CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out *_56% 11041 843 0 11926 48613 42164 571755764 5350017024 0 0 1 94% 100% :v 100% 12 0 30 0 0 655 647_* 66% 5655 943 0 6612 38929 30760 39402 62888 0 0 1 98% 97% Hs 100% 3 0 11 0 0 53 375 52% 4508 419 0 4992 37034 23069 36347 92920 0 0 1 97% 100% :f 100% 19 0 46 0 0 842 800
CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out 33% 1716 1830 0 3805 5017 34051 26328 43388 0 0 53s 96% 100% :f 24% 0 0 259 0 0 36 7332 42% 9556 1372 0 11483 10188 18549 21440 23824 0 0 53s 96% 100% :v 35% 7 0 548 0 0 307 8364 40% 3067 1878 0 6167 11743 38513 36296 68 0 0 53s 95% 5% : 47% 3 0 1219 0 0 803 14610 35% 1764 1664 0 4289 16814 38170 48450 0 0 0 57s 94% 0% - 59% 6 0 855 0 0 392 11342 *_35% 3068 931 0 4669 15851 52406 6530898751 4766869982 0 0 55s 95% 0% - 58% 12 0 658 0 0 17 9101_* 27% 3008 928 0 4263 14336 54182 60996 0 0 0 55s 94% 0% - 64% 3 0 324 0 0 0 9834
53% 4781 3550 0 8356 37070 56790 57780 15816 0 0 1s 96% 40% : 93% 0 0 25 0 0 135 541 72% 6323 1761 0 8095 42569 22303 75804 100132 0 0 0s 96% 76% Hf 91% 0 0 11 0 0 163 16 *_56% 11134 3358 0 14525 35197 22982 6598065628 4808667416 0 0 0s 93% 100% :f 73% 20 0 13 0 0 70 0_* 79% 10695 2746 0 13449 112103 17847 74439 96096 0 0 0s 96% 78% Hq 89% 3 0 5 0 0 17 0 84% 9690 2643 0 12438 91183 26266 82004 162335 0 0 42s 96% 100% Hn 100% 11 0 94 0 0 979 726 77% 10334 5223 0 15659 92746 28877 51385 107409 0 0 42s 96% 99% : 100% 88 0 14 0 0 7 74
CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out 56% 7776 5374 0 13736 12413 20623 40795 70765 0 0 1 97% 100% :f 46% 7 0 579 0 0 258 4419 48% 9344 3753 0 13575 12647 50606 37204 35308 0 0 1 97% 61% : 46% 0 0 478 0 0 10 4063 38% 9098 2426 0 12015 11441 29765 17704 0 0 0 1 97% 0% - 74% 0 0 491 0 0 279 4137 *_48% 10616 2339 0 13448 13008 41186 6618900600 4809364036 0 0 1 97% 0% - 68% 15 0 478 0 0 49 3924_* 50% 13892 1838 0 15995 12338 50661 41572 24 0 0 1 97% 0% - 76% 3 0 262 0 0 123 2077
Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment.
No. I collected these four examples as they popped up over a 10-15 minute time span of running sysstat. At first glance, there appeared to be no regularity to them. Perhaps I'll do this again and time the intervals between entries.
Running OnTap 8.1.1P1 on FAS3160, BTW.
On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:51 PM, Jeremy Page jeremy.page@gilbarco.com wrote:
Is that at default intervals?
On 02/26/2013 01:37 PM, Scott Eno wrote:
Ever come across this? That's a whole lot of reads and writes in one second! All other numbers seem accurate, but those Disk read and kB/s write numbers are absurd.
CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out 56% 11041 843 0 11926 48613 42164 571755764 5350017024 0 0 1 94% 100% :v 100% 12 0 30 0 0 655 647 66% 5655 943 0 6612 38929 30760 39402 62888 0 0 1 98% 97% Hs 100% 3 0 11 0 0 53 375 52% 4508 419 0 4992 37034 23069 36347 92920 0 0 1 97% 100% :f 100% 19 0 46 0 0 842 800
CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out 33% 1716 1830 0 3805 5017 34051 26328 43388 0 0 53s 96% 100% :f 24% 0 0 259 0 0 36 7332 42% 9556 1372 0 11483 10188 18549 21440 23824 0 0 53s 96% 100% :v 35% 7 0 548 0 0 307 8364 40% 3067 1878 0 6167 11743 38513 36296 68 0 0 53s 95% 5% : 47% 3 0 1219 0 0 803 14610 35% 1764 1664 0 4289 16814 38170 48450 0 0 0 57s 94% 0% - 59% 6 0 855 0 0 392 11342 35% 3068 931 0 4669 15851 52406 6530898751 4766869982 0 0 55s 95% 0% - 58% 12 0 658 0 0 17 9101 27% 3008 928 0 4263 14336 54182 60996 0 0 0 55s 94% 0% - 64% 3 0 324 0 0 0 9834
53% 4781 3550 0 8356 37070 56790 57780 15816 0 0 1s 96% 40% : 93% 0 0 25 0 0 135 541 72% 6323 1761 0 8095 42569 22303 75804 100132 0 0 0s 96% 76% Hf 91% 0 0 11 0 0 163 16 56% 11134 3358 0 14525 35197 22982 6598065628 4808667416 0 0 0s 93% 100% :f 73% 20 0 13 0 0 70 0 79% 10695 2746 0 13449 112103 17847 74439 96096 0 0 0s 96% 78% Hq 89% 3 0 5 0 0 17 0 84% 9690 2643 0 12438 91183 26266 82004 162335 0 0 42s 96% 100% Hn 100% 11 0 94 0 0 979 726 77% 10334 5223 0 15659 92746 28877 51385 107409 0 0 42s 96% 99% : 100% 88 0 14 0 0 7 74
CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Total Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache Cache CP CP Disk OTHER FCP iSCSI FCP kB/s iSCSI kB/s in out read write read write age hit time ty util in out in out 56% 7776 5374 0 13736 12413 20623 40795 70765 0 0 1 97% 100% :f 46% 7 0 579 0 0 258 4419 48% 9344 3753 0 13575 12647 50606 37204 35308 0 0 1 97% 61% : 46% 0 0 478 0 0 10 4063 38% 9098 2426 0 12015 11441 29765 17704 0 0 0 1 97% 0% - 74% 0 0 491 0 0 279 4137 48% 10616 2339 0 13448 13008 41186 6618900600 4809364036 0 0 1 97% 0% - 68% 15 0 478 0 0 49 3924 50% 13892 1838 0 15995 12338 50661 41572 24 0 0 1 97% 0% - 76% 3 0 262 0 0 123 2077
Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
-
Jeremy Page -
Scott Eno