Grant,
Thanks for the information. I'd like to comment on a few things. First, let me say that I am a fan of NDMP, as it is giving us a valid solution for backing up all these NetApps I keep seeing everywhere. ;) Before valid NDMP server and client software was in place, all we had was NFS. I have a lot of respect for NetApp and the other backup and recovery options you have (Snapshots, SnapMirror, etc.), but I would like this one issue addressed.
At 11:45 AM 6/27/2001 -0700, Melvin, Grant wrote:
NetApp's dump is no stranger to this, we have added support for qtree metadata, NT ACLs, Unicode, NT Streams. However, a standard BSD restore compatible application such as Solaris' ufsrestore can still restore the data, but will only restore NFS attributes. So should you have zero filers in 10 years (heaven forbid) and a pile of NDMP/dump tapes to restore from then as long as you have access to a dump compatible restore program you should be able to manually retrieve your data.
The key for the original poster to understand is the word _manually_. This means that you can load the tape into a Solaris box (or any box that can read BSD dump, such as HP, AIX, Linux), do some manual tape manipulation, and be able to restore the data (without the NT-specific info). This is a far cry from being able to point and click your restores into existence.
Legato's BudTool product proved that NetApp data could be restored on non-NetApp storage either in a disaster recovery scenario or because that is what the customer wants. We'd like to think that some if not all of the current 7 NDMP-compliant backup software applications that support NetApp could add the same capability.
Yes, they could, and I wish they would. I wonder if some of us should just write a tool that does that? Hmmm.. Gears churning.... I wonder if we could figure out a way to feed these tapes to AMANDA, and have AMANDA automate the restores. Or just write our own utility... Hmm.... Anyone interested in this project?
Marion asks for a standard backup tape format that can be interchanged between NDMP-compliant vendors and we applaud her for it. However, that is beyond the current scope of the NDMP community or the SNIA Backup working group in general. We think its going to take an awful lot of persuading to get all the current backup software vendors to define a single format and then have all the possible system vendors support it. Most companies have chosen their solution based on trying to differentiate themselves from all the others and we see that continuing for some time.
Yes, it would take some doing to accomplish that. However, we've got to start somewhere. My biggest issue with NDMP is that it allows the OS vendor (in this case NetApp) to determine the backup format. I understand that it would be a lot of work to get this accomplished, but I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility.
Trying to differentiate yourself in the backup world is a bad thing. (I submit for your perusal IRIX's XFSDUMP.) I'm glad to hear that NetApps tapes can at least be read by a dump-knowledgeable box. But you're not the only vendor out there.
Yes, I know that it says right in the V5 spec that backup format is out of scope. Yes, I know that getting a bunch of vendors to get together is not an easy thing. But I'll keep saying that this should be in scope until somebody listens:
OS-SPECIFIC BACKUP COMMANDS BAD
I do wish that Veritas would make their multiplexed backup format a little more open, and make a command that can easily read a NetBackup multiplexed tape if NetBackup is dead, but at least their backup format is the same on every box. The idea of going back to the days when I had Solaris, HP, and Ultrix dump tapes, and 3B2 cpio tapes, and VAX backup tapes gives me chills. And, given the upcoming prominence of the NAS industry, we may have just that. (Assuming you're in a shop that has more than one NAS vendor.) That would stink.
Anybody that agree with me, feel free to send a "me too" message.
--- W. Curtis Preston Principal Consultant for Storage Designs, your storage experts Webmaster: http://www.backupcentral.com Phone: 760 653 1007
The best solution -?? - allow the customer to tell ndmp what backup/dump program to use.
ndmp everywhere !!?!
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, W. Curtis Preston wrote:
Grant,
Thanks for the information. I'd like to comment on a few things. First, let me say that I am a fan of NDMP, as it is giving us a valid solution for backing up all these NetApps I keep seeing everywhere. ;) Before valid NDMP server and client software was in place, all we had was NFS. I have a lot of respect for NetApp and the other backup and recovery options you have (Snapshots, SnapMirror, etc.), but I would like this one issue addressed.
At 11:45 AM 6/27/2001 -0700, Melvin, Grant wrote:
NetApp's dump is no stranger to this, we have added support for qtree metadata, NT ACLs, Unicode, NT Streams. However, a standard BSD restore compatible application such as Solaris' ufsrestore can still restore the data, but will only restore NFS attributes. So should you have zero filers in 10 years (heaven forbid) and a pile of NDMP/dump tapes to restore from then as long as you have access to a dump compatible restore program you should be able to manually retrieve your data.
The key for the original poster to understand is the word _manually_. This means that you can load the tape into a Solaris box (or any box that can read BSD dump, such as HP, AIX, Linux), do some manual tape manipulation, and be able to restore the data (without the NT-specific info). This is a far cry from being able to point and click your restores into existence.
Legato's BudTool product proved that NetApp data could be restored on non-NetApp storage either in a disaster recovery scenario or because that is what the customer wants. We'd like to think that some if not all of the current 7 NDMP-compliant backup software applications that support NetApp could add the same capability.
Yes, they could, and I wish they would. I wonder if some of us should just write a tool that does that? Hmmm.. Gears churning.... I wonder if we could figure out a way to feed these tapes to AMANDA, and have AMANDA automate the restores. Or just write our own utility... Hmm.... Anyone interested in this project?
Marion asks for a standard backup tape format that can be interchanged between NDMP-compliant vendors and we applaud her for it. However, that is beyond the current scope of the NDMP community or the SNIA Backup working group in general. We think its going to take an awful lot of persuading to get all the current backup software vendors to define a single format and then have all the possible system vendors support it. Most companies have chosen their solution based on trying to differentiate themselves from all the others and we see that continuing for some time.
Yes, it would take some doing to accomplish that. However, we've got to start somewhere. My biggest issue with NDMP is that it allows the OS vendor (in this case NetApp) to determine the backup format. I understand that it would be a lot of work to get this accomplished, but I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility.
Trying to differentiate yourself in the backup world is a bad thing. (I submit for your perusal IRIX's XFSDUMP.) I'm glad to hear that NetApps tapes can at least be read by a dump-knowledgeable box. But you're not the only vendor out there.
Yes, I know that it says right in the V5 spec that backup format is out of scope. Yes, I know that getting a bunch of vendors to get together is not an easy thing. But I'll keep saying that this should be in scope until somebody listens:
OS-SPECIFIC BACKUP COMMANDS BAD
I do wish that Veritas would make their multiplexed backup format a little more open, and make a command that can easily read a NetBackup multiplexed tape if NetBackup is dead, but at least their backup format is the same on every box. The idea of going back to the days when I had Solaris, HP, and Ultrix dump tapes, and 3B2 cpio tapes, and VAX backup tapes gives me chills. And, given the upcoming prominence of the NAS industry, we may have just that. (Assuming you're in a shop that has more than one NAS vendor.) That would stink.
Anybody that agree with me, feel free to send a "me too" message.
W. Curtis Preston Principal Consultant for Storage Designs, your storage experts Webmaster: http://www.backupcentral.com Phone: 760 653 1007
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Yup, I fully agree.
Quoting "W. Curtis Preston" curtis@backupcentral.com:
Grant,
Thanks for the information. I'd like to comment on a
few things. First,
let me say that I am a fan of NDMP, as it is giving
us a valid solution for
backing up all these NetApps I keep seeing
everywhere. ;) Before valid
NDMP server and client software was in place, all we
had was NFS. I have a
lot of respect for NetApp and the other backup and
recovery options you
have (Snapshots, SnapMirror, etc.), but I would like
this one issue
addressed.
At 11:45 AM 6/27/2001 -0700, Melvin, Grant wrote:
NetApp's dump is no stranger to this, we
have added support
for qtree metadata, NT ACLs, Unicode, NT
Streams. However, a
standard BSD restore compatible application
such as Solaris'
ufsrestore can still restore the data, but
will only restore
NFS attributes. So should you have zero
filers in 10 years
(heaven forbid) and a pile of NDMP/dump
tapes to restore from
then as long as you have access to a dump
compatible restore
program you should be able to manually
retrieve your data.
The key for the original poster to understand is the
word _manually_. This
means that you can load the tape into a Solaris box
(or any box that can
read BSD dump, such as HP, AIX, Linux), do some
manual tape manipulation,
and be able to restore the data (without the NT-
specific info). This is a
far cry from being able to point and click your
restores into existence.
Legato's BudTool product proved that NetApp
data could be
restored on non-NetApp storage either in a
disaster recovery
scenario or because that is what the
customer wants. We'd like
to think that some if not all of the
current 7 NDMP-compliant
backup software applications that support
NetApp could add the
same capability.
Yes, they could, and I wish they would. I wonder if
some of us should just
write a tool that does that? Hmmm.. Gears
churning....
I wonder if we could figure out a way to feed these
tapes to AMANDA, and
have AMANDA automate the restores. Or just write our own utility... Hmm.... Anyone
interested in this
project?
Marion asks for a standard backup tape
format that can be
interchanged between NDMP-compliant vendors
and we applaud
her for it. However, that is beyond the
current scope of the
NDMP community or the SNIA Backup working
group in general.
We think its going to take an awful lot of
persuading to get
all the current backup software vendors to
define a single
format and then have all the possible
system vendors support
it. Most companies have chosen their
solution based on
trying to differentiate themselves from all
the others and
we see that continuing for some time.
Yes, it would take some doing to accomplish that.
However, we've got to
start somewhere. My biggest issue with NDMP is that
it allows the OS
vendor (in this case NetApp) to determine the backup
format. I understand
that it would be a lot of work to get this
accomplished, but I don't think
it's outside the realm of possibility.
Trying to differentiate yourself in the backup world
is a bad thing. (I
submit for your perusal IRIX's XFSDUMP.) I'm glad to
hear that NetApps
tapes can at least be read by a dump-knowledgeable
box. But you're not the
only vendor out there.
Yes, I know that it says right in the V5 spec that
backup format is out of
scope. Yes, I know that getting a bunch of vendors
to get together is not
an easy thing. But I'll keep saying that this should
be in scope until
somebody listens:
OS-SPECIFIC BACKUP COMMANDS BAD
I do wish that Veritas would make their multiplexed
backup format a little
more open, and make a command that can easily read a
NetBackup multiplexed
tape if NetBackup is dead, but at least their backup
format is the same on
every box. The idea of going back to the days when I
had Solaris, HP,
and Ultrix dump tapes, and 3B2 cpio tapes, and VAX
backup tapes gives me
chills. And, given the upcoming prominence of the
NAS industry, we may
have just that. (Assuming you're in a shop that has
more than one NAS
vendor.) That would stink.
Anybody that agree with me, feel free to send a "me
too" message.
W. Curtis Preston Principal Consultant for Storage Designs, your
storage experts
Webmaster: http://www.backupcentral.com Phone: 760
653 1007
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-
bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas- bu
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> David A. Chapa Consulting Manager DataStaff, Inc. 847 413 1144 http://www.consulting.datastaff.com --------------------------------------- http://www.xbpadm-commands.com NBU-LSERV@datastaff.com - Adv. Scripting