You need to take into account the port now. So a dual card has ports a and b so you do e4a and e4b to create the vif for all ports on card 4. if you had a quad port card then you have a, b, c and d as the ports so e4a to e4d.
Regards,
Phil Dean IBS/PBS Data Storage Support Institutional and Business Systems Premium Business Services
Level 5, 48 Martin Place Sydney, NSW 2000 * 02 9378-5988 Fax: 02 9378-5202 Mob: 0407 478 695
* deanph@cba.com.au
-----Original Message----- From: drew.odonnell@americas.bnpparibas.com [mailto:drew.odonnell@americas.bnpparibas.com] Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2005 10:42 AM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Multimode VIF
I just picked up a few netapps and I was looking to create some VIFS I have not done before. Basically I have two of the new dual GB cards one in slot 4 and the other in slot five. I would like some ideas since I have only historically done single mode VIFS (1 port per card) like the following: vif create single trunk1 e4 e5 vif favor e4 ifconfig trunk1 x.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0 wins route add default x.x.x.x 1
What I want to do is a multimode using the 2 dual cards, each one going to separate switches (2 connections per card - per switch). Unfortunately from what I understand, the Cisco 6509 does not support Active Active trunk groups across 2 different switches. We can however have an active active trunk created between 2 ports on the same switch.
So I would like to have 1 dual card go to one switch (On two different blades), and the send the other two to another switch. I would like 2 of the 4 ports transmitting/receiving under 1 virtual address. Essentially, most of the switch failures I have seen are logical, on the port or blade. In this event the netapp does not failover. My thoughts are if I go on 2 different blades on the same switch, and I have both cards transmitting, and receiving, then if I lose one port or blade, I will have another card.
If we lose the whole switch,then we would failover to the secondary VIF.
Do I create 2 different VIFS, and then create a 3rd VIF, (Essentially viffing the VIFS)
I am sure I am not the first to head down this road, so any helpful advice would be great, I am not finding to much on the NOW site.
Thanks Drew
This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
---------------------------------------------
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************
The example of the VIF I put in the mail is not what I was thinking on using, this is a single mode I had on one of my other filers, I am not sure why I even put it there. here is kind of what I was thinking if I were to attempt it
vif create multi trunk1 e4a e5a vif create multi trunk2 e4b e5b VIF create single trunk3 trunk1 trunk2 vif favor trunk1 Not sure on the ifconfig statement(s)
Internet deanph@cba.com.au To: Drew O'DONNELL, toasters cc: 03/14/2005 06:50 PM bcc: Subject: RE: Multimode VIF
You need to take into account the port now. So a dual card has ports a and b so you do e4a and e4b to create the vif for all ports on card 4. if you had a quad port card then you have a, b, c and d as the ports so e4a to e4d.
Regards,
Phil Dean IBS/PBS Data Storage Support Institutional and Business Systems Premium Business Services
Level 5, 48 Martin Place Sydney, NSW 2000 * 02 9378-5988 Fax: 02 9378-5202 Mob: 0407 478 695
* deanph@cba.com.au
-----Original Message----- From: drew.odonnell@americas.bnpparibas.com [mailto:drew.odonnell@americas.bnpparibas.com] Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2005 10:42 AM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Multimode VIF
I just picked up a few netapps and I was looking to create some VIFS I have not done before. Basically I have two of the new dual GB cards one in slot 4 and the other in slot five. I would like some ideas since I have only historically done single mode VIFS (1 port per card) like the following: vif create single trunk1 e4 e5 vif favor e4 ifconfig trunk1 x.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0 wins route add default x.x.x.x 1
What I want to do is a multimode using the 2 dual cards, each one going to separate switches (2 connections per card - per switch). Unfortunately from what I understand, the Cisco 6509 does not support Active Active trunk groups across 2 different switches. We can however have an active active trunk created between 2 ports on the same switch.
So I would like to have 1 dual card go to one switch (On two different blades), and the send the other two to another switch. I would like 2 of the 4 ports transmitting/receiving under 1 virtual address. Essentially, most of the switch failures I have seen are logical, on the port or blade. In this event the netapp does not failover. My thoughts are if I go on 2 different blades on the same switch, and I have both cards transmitting, and receiving, then if I lose one port or blade, I will have another card.
If we lose the whole switch,then we would failover to the secondary VIF.
Do I create 2 different VIFS, and then create a 3rd VIF, (Essentially viffing the VIFS)
I am sure I am not the first to head down this road, so any helpful advice would be great, I am not finding to much on the NOW site.
Thanks Drew
This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
---------------------------------------------
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************
This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
---------------------------------------------
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
-
Dean, Phil (ITO) -
drew.odonnellï¼ americas.bnpparibas.com