Does DOT support soft and hard quotas? How about time limits? From everything I've searched, it looks like it only supports hard limits.
Regards, Tim
-- Timothy Demarest ArrayComm, Inc. demarest@arraycomm.com 2480 N. 1st Street, Suite 200 http://www.arraycomm.com San Jose, CA 95131
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Timothy Demarest wrote:
Does DOT support soft and hard quotas? How about time limits? From everything I've searched, it looks like it only supports hard limits.
The NetAppen only support hard quotas.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Timothy Demarest wrote:
Does DOT support soft and hard quotas? How about time limits? From everything I've searched, it looks like it only supports hard limits.
The NetAppen only support hard quotas.
The same is true of all NFS servers when serving data to remote systems. Not just Netapp.
Bruce
sirbruce@ix.netcom.com (Bruce Sterling Woodcock) writes:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Timothy Demarest wrote:
Does DOT support soft and hard quotas? How about time limits? From everything I've searched, it looks like it only supports hard limits.
The NetAppen only support hard quotas.
The same is true of all NFS servers when serving data to remote systems. Not just Netapp.
That's simply not true. Any Unix filing system with a quota system descended from the BSD one (e.g. Solaris ufs quotas) supports soft and hard quotas, and will apply them in just the same way to file operations over NFS as to local ones.
Perhaps you meant that the asynchronous warning messages from the kernel to the logged on user when going over the soft quota won't happen if you aren't actually logged on to the server? That's true, of course, but such messages were always a bad idea, and aren't the reason why people want a more flexible quota control system.
Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service, Email: cet1@ucs.cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG, Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.
"Chris" == Chris Thompson cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk wrote the following on Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:33:48 +0100 (BST)
Chris> sirbruce@ix.netcom.com (Bruce Sterling Woodcock) writes:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 06:46:58PM -0700, Timothy Demarest wrote: > Does DOT support soft and hard quotas? How about > > time limits?
From everything I've searched, it looks like > > it only supports hard limits. > > The NetAppen only support hard quotas.
The same is true of all NFS servers when serving data to remote systems. Not just Netapp.
Chris> That's simply not true. Any Unix filing system with a quota system Chris> descended from the BSD one (e.g. Solaris ufs quotas) supports soft Chris> and hard quotas, and will apply them in just the same way to file Chris> operations over NFS as to local ones.
Chris:
Thanks for the clarification. I have an old Falcon, nee Artecon, nee Dothill, FastFile Pro (or LynxNSS depending on the name you want to go by), that runs some sort of BSD derivative. While both the hardware and Lynx OS really suck, it does support soft quotas and grace periods. The SunOS and Solaris clients understand the soft quotas and grace period over NFS.
Ideally, this would be nice on the Filer because we send out warning messages via email each night to those who are close to their quota.
Tim
-- Timothy Demarest ArrayComm, Inc. demarest@arraycomm.com 2480 North 1st Street, Suite 200 http://www.arraycomm.com San Jose, CA 95131