Sorry about this folks. I realized too late that the message I was responding to was dated back in March. I seem to be getting a lot of fairly old messages suddenly coming through. Is this happening to anyone else?
* Mike Sphar mike.sphar@peregrine.com [011012 15:09]:
Sorry about this folks. I realized too late that the message I was responding to was dated back in March. I seem to be getting a lot of fairly old messages suddenly coming through. Is this happening to anyone else?
me too, looks like something at enteract.com is re-injecting old messages.
LER
I thought that my mail was going a bit crazy. I'm getting lots of old stuff too.
barry
On Friday, October 12, 2001, at 03:44 PM, Mike Sphar wrote:
Sorry about this folks. I realized too late that the message I was responding to was dated back in March. I seem to be getting a lot of fairly old messages suddenly coming through. Is this happening to anyone else?
-- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-----Original Message----- From: Mike Sphar Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 12:07 PM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: RE: ontap 6.x
Where is it stated that 5.3.6R2 is the "Recommended Release"? The NOW site lists "Data ONTAP 6.0.1R3" as the "General Availability Release" for me.
-- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:30 PM To: listsarch-toasters@enteract.com Cc: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Re: ontap 6.x
nlehrer@ibb.gov (neil lehrer) writes
is it time to adopt 6.x?
Of couse, that's an impossible question to answer in vacuo.
My feeling is that for those who usually run Early Access releases, 6.0 is increasingly looking like the place to be. We are planning to upgrade the F740 we use as the primary filestore for our (somewhat grandiloquently named) Central Unix Service from 5.3.7R1 to 6.0.1R3 at the end of next week, when the university term ends. I want the fast snapshots, but apart from that I want to be on the track where bugs are fixed fastest, and that's clearly 6.0 now.
On the other hand, the two F740's used by our mail systems have much more stereotyped usage patterns. They are currently at 5.3.6R2 (which is, after all, still the "Recommended Release") and it seems unlikely they will be upgraded before the summer, at the earliest. If you aren't pushing the edge of the envelope, in one way or another, there's no enormously compelling reason to move yet.
Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service, Email: cet1@ucs.cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG, Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.
Yes. I am receiving them too.
Mike Sphar wrote:
Sorry about this folks. I realized too late that the message I was responding to was dated back in March. I seem to be getting a lot of fairly old messages suddenly coming through. Is this happening to anyone else?
-- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-----Original Message----- From: Mike Sphar Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 12:07 PM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: RE: ontap 6.x
Where is it stated that 5.3.6R2 is the "Recommended Release"? The NOW site lists "Data ONTAP 6.0.1R3" as the "General Availability Release" for me.
-- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 2:30 PM To: listsarch-toasters@enteract.com Cc: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Re: ontap 6.x
nlehrer@ibb.gov (neil lehrer) writes
is it time to adopt 6.x?
Of couse, that's an impossible question to answer in vacuo.
My feeling is that for those who usually run Early Access releases, 6.0 is increasingly looking like the place to be. We are planning to upgrade the F740 we use as the primary filestore for our (somewhat grandiloquently named) Central Unix Service from 5.3.7R1 to 6.0.1R3 at the end of next week, when the university term ends. I want the fast snapshots, but apart from that I want to be on the track where bugs are fixed fastest, and that's clearly 6.0 now.
On the other hand, the two F740's used by our mail systems have much more stereotyped usage patterns. They are currently at 5.3.6R2 (which is, after all, still the "Recommended Release") and it seems unlikely they will be upgraded before the summer, at the earliest. If you aren't pushing the edge of the envelope, in one way or another, there's no enormously compelling reason to move yet.
Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service, Email: cet1@ucs.cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG, Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.
-
Barry Lustig -
Dale Wolf -
Larry Rosenman -
Mike Sphar