Maybe I am missing something here: FAS6040 DOT 7.3.1.1 FC 500GB LUN 0 fractional reserve thin provisioned running dedupe (love it)
I think there is a bug maybe in my version of DOT. I ran df-s on a volume, and this is what I am seeing.
/vol/netapp_vol_vmware_DMZ_01/ 79484444 74719212 48%
Should it be around 94% ?
Here is the image from DFM (3.8) http://old.nabble.com/file/p28236746/25236%255B1%255D.gif
What does aggr show_space show ? I am pretty sure thin provisioned volumes require 100% snap reserve.
_________ ______ _
* email:Jeremy.Page@gilbarco.com - * phone: 336.547.5399 - 6 fax: 336.547.5163 - * cell: 336.601.7274
________________________________
From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of steve klise Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 7:23 PM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: df -s value
Maybe I am missing something here: FAS6040 DOT 7.3.1.1 FC 500GB LUN 0 fractional reserve thin provisioned running dedupe (love it) I think there is a bug maybe in my version of DOT. I ran df-s on a volume, and this is what I am seeing. /vol/netapp_vol_vmware_DMZ_01/ 79484444 74719212 48% Should it be around 94% ? Here is the image from DFM (3.8) http://old.nabble.com/file/p28236746/25236%255B1%255D.gif
________________________________
View this message in context: df -s value http://old.nabble.com/df--s-value-tp28236746p28236746.html Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive http://old.nabble.com/Network-Appliance---Toasters-f2062.html at Nabble.com.
Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment.
Hi Steve,
Here's how I look at the numbers reported by df -s:
- The first number is space used. This is the physical space used by the active file system and snapshots to store the unique blocks in the volume.
- The second number is space saved. This is the space that would be used by shared blocks; the blocks that have been identified as duplicate copies and freed up.
- The percentage is based on space saved divided by total disk space usage if deduplication was not used. This non-deduplicated total space usage is the sum of the unique blocks ("used") and the shared blocks ("saved"). Another way to look at this total is to consider it the total amount of logical data that is being stored in the deduplicated volume.
So, 74719212/(74719212+79484444) = 48%
Does that help?
---Karl
Karl L. Konnerth
Systems Engineer
NetApp
From: steve klise [mailto:klises@caminomedical.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:23 PM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: df -s value
Maybe I am missing something here: FAS6040 DOT 7.3.1.1 FC 500GB LUN 0 fractional reserve thin provisioned running dedupe (love it) I think there is a bug maybe in my version of DOT. I ran df-s on a volume, and this is what I am seeing. /vol/netapp_vol_vmware_DMZ_01/ 79484444 74719212 48% Should it be around 94% ? Here is the image from DFM (3.8) http://old.nabble.com/file/p28236746/25236%255B1%255D.gif
________________________________
View this message in context: df -s value http://old.nabble.com/df--s-value-tp28236746p28236746.html Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive http://old.nabble.com/Network-Appliance---Toasters-f2062.html at Nabble.com.
ok, I guess that makes sense. I guess I was stumped when the image in OM shows it at the same level as the space being used, so thanks for the great explaination.
steve klise wrote:
Maybe I am missing something here: FAS6040 DOT 7.3.1.1 FC 500GB LUN 0 fractional reserve thin provisioned running dedupe (love it)
I think there is a bug maybe in my version of DOT. I ran df-s on a volume, and this is what I am seeing.
/vol/netapp_vol_vmware_DMZ_01/ 79484444 74719212 48%
Should it be around 94% ?
Here is the image from DFM (3.8) http://old.nabble.com/file/p28236746/25236%255B1%255D.gif
http://old.nabble.com/file/p28243929/25236%255B1%255D.gif
-
Konnerth, Karl -
Page, Jeremy -
steve klise