Was there a thread after this ?
Just making sure, I'm getting them all..
From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 5:29 PM To: tmac Cc: <,Toasters@teaparty.net>, Subject: Re: Third party LR 10G networking.
It sounds like someone else may be working that already. If they get one approved we may be able to piggy back on that.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:04 PM, tmac <tmacmd@gmail.com mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com > wrote:
Ask for a PVR from NetApp. The card with removable optics should support the LRs, NetApp would just needed to support the driver.
On Sep 3, 2013 3:56 PM, "Jeff Cleverley" <jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com mailto:jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com > wrote:
We're looking at having multiple connections per filer going to a switch in each room to remove the switch as a single point of failure. The single mode cabling will most likely be more compatible with 40G and 100G networking in the next few years.
Jeff
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:05 PM, tmac <tmacmd@gmail.com mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com > wrote:
Why not use SR optics from the NetApp to the switch (supported by netapp)
And then LR optics between switches?
--tmac
Tim McCarthy
Principal Consultant
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6874230/na_cert_dma_2c.jpg http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6874230/rhce.jpeg http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6874230/na_cert_ie-san_2c.jpg
Clustered ONTAP Clustered ONTAP
NCDA ID: XK7R3GEKC1QQ2LVD RHCE6 110-107-141 https://www.redhat.com/wapps/training/certification/verify.html?certNumber= 110-107-141&isSearch=False&verify=Verify NCSIE ID: C14QPHE21FR4YWD4
Expires: 08 November 2014 Current until Aug 02, 2016 Expires: 08 November 2014
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Jeff Cleverley <jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com mailto:jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com > wrote:
Greetings,
We are looking at upgrading and changing our network architecture. One option would be to use LR GBIC with single mode fibre. This appears to require non-NetApp GBIC which I'm sure makes it unsupported.
Is anyone doing this, and if so, which parts are you using and what issues have you run into?
Thanks,
Jeff
There has been no update from me. We haven't heard anything back from NetApp and don't have a timetable for anything. If something comes up I'll try to remember to post a reply.
Jeff
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Uddhav Regmi uregmi111@gmail.com wrote:
Was there a thread after this ?****
Just making sure, I’m getting them all….****
*From:* toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Cleverley *Sent:* Tuesday, September 03, 2013 5:29 PM *To:* tmac *Cc:* <,Toasters@teaparty.net>, *Subject:* Re: Third party LR 10G networking.****
It sounds like someone else may be working that already. If they get one approved we may be able to piggy back on that. ****
Thanks,****
Jeff****
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:04 PM, tmac tmacmd@gmail.com wrote:****
Ask for a PVR from NetApp. The card with removable optics should support the LRs, NetApp would just needed to support the driver.****
On Sep 3, 2013 3:56 PM, "Jeff Cleverley" jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com wrote:****
We're looking at having multiple connections per filer going to a switch in each room to remove the switch as a single point of failure. The single mode cabling will most likely be more compatible with 40G and 100G networking in the next few years. ****
Jeff****
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:05 PM, tmac tmacmd@gmail.com wrote:****
Why not use SR optics from the NetApp to the switch (supported by netapp)*
And then LR optics between switches?****
--tmac****
*Tim McCarthy*****
*Principal Consultant*****
****
Clustered ONTAP Clustered ONTAP****NCDA ID: XK7R3GEKC1QQ2LVD RHCE6 110-107-141https://www.redhat.com/wapps/training/certification/verify.html?certNumber=110-107-141&isSearch=False&verify=Verify NCSIE ID: C14QPHE21FR4YWD4****
Expires: 08 November 2014 Current until Aug 02, 2016 Expires: 08 November 2014****
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Jeff Cleverley < jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com> wrote:****
Greetings,****
We are looking at upgrading and changing our network architecture. One option would be to use LR GBIC with single mode fibre. This appears to require non-NetApp GBIC which I'm sure makes it unsupported.****
Is anyone doing this, and if so, which parts are you using and what issues have you run into?****
Thanks,
Jeff
-- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611****
Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters****
-- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611****
-- Jeff Cleverley Unix Systems Administrator 4380 Ziegler Road Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 970-288-4611****
No, what I'm saying is : after this thread, I saw one another new thread, which I did not get it
So, just wanted to confirm ..
From: Jeff Cleverley [mailto:jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:25 AM To: Uddhav Regmi Cc: tmac; Toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Re: was there a thread after this ?
There has been no update from me. We haven't heard anything back from NetApp and don't have a timetable for anything. If something comes up I'll try to remember to post a reply.
Jeff
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Uddhav Regmi <uregmi111@gmail.com mailto:uregmi111@gmail.com > wrote:
Was there a thread after this ?
Just making sure, I'm getting them all..
From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net ] On Behalf Of Jeff Cleverley Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 5:29 PM To: tmac Cc: <,Toasters@teaparty.net mailto:Toasters@teaparty.net >, Subject: Re: Third party LR 10G networking.
It sounds like someone else may be working that already. If they get one approved we may be able to piggy back on that.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:04 PM, tmac <tmacmd@gmail.com mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com > wrote:
Ask for a PVR from NetApp. The card with removable optics should support the LRs, NetApp would just needed to support the driver.
On Sep 3, 2013 3:56 PM, "Jeff Cleverley" <jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com mailto:jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com > wrote:
We're looking at having multiple connections per filer going to a switch in each room to remove the switch as a single point of failure. The single mode cabling will most likely be more compatible with 40G and 100G networking in the next few years.
Jeff
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:05 PM, tmac <tmacmd@gmail.com mailto:tmacmd@gmail.com > wrote:
Why not use SR optics from the NetApp to the switch (supported by netapp)
And then LR optics between switches?
--tmac
Tim McCarthy
Principal Consultant
Clustered ONTAP Clustered ONTAP
NCDA ID: XK7R3GEKC1QQ2LVD RHCE6 110-107-141 https://www.redhat.com/wapps/training/certification/verify.html?certNumber= 110-107-141&isSearch=False&verify=Verify NCSIE ID: C14QPHE21FR4YWD4
Expires: 08 November 2014 Current until Aug 02, 2016 Expires: 08 November 2014
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Jeff Cleverley <jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com mailto:jeff.cleverley@avagotech.com > wrote:
Greetings,
We are looking at upgrading and changing our network architecture. One option would be to use LR GBIC with single mode fibre. This appears to require non-NetApp GBIC which I'm sure makes it unsupported.
Is anyone doing this, and if so, which parts are you using and what issues have you run into?
Thanks,
Jeff
-
Jeff Cleverley -
Uddhav Regmi