Sorry, are you refering to the desired and off, or are you saying that it should be enabled?
Thanks
-----Original Message----- From: Michael van Elst [mailto:mlelstv@xlink.net] Sent: 02 April 2002 14:21 To: Noll, Kevin Cc: 'Toasters (E-mail)' Subject: Re: FLOW CONTROL
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote:
Hi All
We are standardized with Sun and Cisco equipment. All equipment on our Database Vlans are using Gig Ethernet. Flow control on our sun servers
are
set to on. However, on our Cisco Switches, the settings are as follows.
set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 send desired
set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 receive off
I am not a cisco engineer, but would like to know if this is correct. I believe it should be both on.
This is the configuration that was necessary on our site (and the same with IOS-based switches). It was also recommended by our local NetApp people.
I guess this makes it as 'correct' as possible.
Greetings,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:19:59PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote:
Sorry, are you refering to the desired and off, or are you saying that it should be enabled?
I am referring to the combination:
send desired receive off
Greetings, Michael van Elst
Thanks
-----Original Message----- From: Michael van Elst [mailto:mlelstv@xlink.net] Sent: 02 April 2002 14:21 To: Noll, Kevin Cc: 'Toasters (E-mail)' Subject: Re: FLOW CONTROL
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote:
Hi All
We are standardized with Sun and Cisco equipment. All equipment on our Database Vlans are using Gig Ethernet. Flow control on our sun servers
are
set to on. However, on our Cisco Switches, the settings are as follows.
set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 send desired
set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 receive off
I am not a cisco engineer, but would like to know if this is correct. I believe it should be both on.
This is the configuration that was necessary on our site (and the same with IOS-based switches). It was also recommended by our local NetApp people.
I guess this makes it as 'correct' as possible.
Greetings,
i.A. Michael van Elst / phone: +49 721 9652 330 Xlink - Network Information Centre / fax: +49 721 9652 349 Emmy-Noether-Strasse 9 /\ link http://nic.xlink.net/ D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany /_______ email: hostmaster@xlink.net [ KPNQwest Germany GmbH, Sitz Karlsruhe ] [ Amtsgericht Karlsruhe HRB 8161, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael Mueller-Berg ]
" This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ".
By default Cisco sets flow control to enable on the send side only. To enable flowcontrol in both directions as desired:
set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 send desired set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 receive desired
If you are going to make these kinds of changes to other switches in your network, do the far ends first so you don't get dropped.
Eff Norwood
-----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Michael van Elst Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:32 AM To: Noll, Kevin Cc: 'mlelstv@xlink.net'; 'Toasters (E-mail)' Subject: Re: FLOW CONTROL
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:19:59PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote:
Sorry, are you refering to the desired and off, or are you
saying that it
should be enabled?
I am referring to the combination:
send desired receive off
Greetings, Michael van Elst
Thanks
-----Original Message----- From: Michael van Elst [mailto:mlelstv@xlink.net] Sent: 02 April 2002 14:21 To: Noll, Kevin Cc: 'Toasters (E-mail)' Subject: Re: FLOW CONTROL
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote:
Hi All
We are standardized with Sun and Cisco equipment. All
equipment on our
Database Vlans are using Gig Ethernet. Flow control on our
sun servers
are
set to on. However, on our Cisco Switches, the settings are
as follows.
set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 send desired
set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 receive off
I am not a cisco engineer, but would like to know if this is
correct. I
believe it should be both on.
This is the configuration that was necessary on our site (and the same with IOS-based switches). It was also recommended by our local NetApp people.
I guess this makes it as 'correct' as possible.
Greetings,
i.A. Michael van Elst / phone: +49 721 9652 330 Xlink - Network Information Centre / fax: +49 721 9652 349 Emmy-Noether-Strasse 9 /\ link http://nic.xlink.net/ D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany /_______ email:
hostmaster@xlink.net
[ KPNQwest Germany GmbH, Sitz Karlsruhe
][ Amtsgericht Karlsruhe HRB 8161, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael
Mueller-Berg ]
" This message contains information that may be privileged or
confidential and
is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is
intended only for
the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, you
are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,
distribute, or use
this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message
in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ".
-- i.A. Michael van Elst / phone: +49 721 9652 330 Xlink - Network Information Centre / fax: +49 721 9652 349 Emmy-Noether-Strasse 9 /\ link http://nic.xlink.net/ D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany /_______ email: hostmaster@xlink.net [ KPNQwest Germany GmbH, Sitz Karlsruhe ] [ Amtsgericht Karlsruhe HRB 8161, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael Mueller-Berg ]
-
Eff Norwood -
Michael van Elst -
Noll, Kevin