Our production systems is functioning properly and all autosupports are being processed.
These bounces were caused by one of our development systems for stress testing the capabilities of email system for autosupport. The developer forgot to throttle the outgoing bounces.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
I am responsible for the Autosupport program and welcome your feedback.
Regards
Suman Brar Program Manager Autosupport 408-822-3492
-----Original Message----- From: Tuc [mailto:ttsg@ttsg.com] Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 6:18 AM To: chris@webtop.com Cc: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Re: Bouncing autosupport?
In article 200012240531.AAA01495@heimdall.ttsg.com, Tuc wrote:
Anyone just rudely woken by :
Oh yes [Grumbles at people who break their mail systems]
I normally don't get upset when people break their mail systems. However, this time, I'm upset for 2 reasons :
- What if my machine needed to log an autosupport
problem that it threw a disk, or something else. 2) I don't like getting woken up at :
00:18:04 00:26:33 02:09:01 02:36:28 04:17:12 04:17:30 04:18:01 04:18:02 05:35:06 and then finally the one at 05:35:07 which only set off 1 monitoring device, not the
other. So I had to get up and work for a 1/2 hour to get it running. Its bad enough when its my own stuff that has a problem keeping me awake... BUT A VENDOR!
Tuc/TTSG
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brar, Suman" suman.brar@netapp.com To: "'Tuc'" ttsg@ttsg.com; chris@webtop.com Cc: toasters@mathworks.com Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 10:25 AM Subject: RE: Bouncing autosupport?
Our production systems is functioning properly and all autosupports are being processed.
These bounces were caused by one of our development systems for stress testing the capabilities of email system for autosupport. The developer forgot to throttle the outgoing bounces.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
I am responsible for the Autosupport program and welcome your feedback.
You want feedback? Testing systems should be on a completely separate, non-routable network so these things can't happen no matter what the tester forgets to do.
Bruce
PS - You will discover this is not a new idea.