We've upgraded to 5.3.2, but found several problems. Any advice would be much appreciated.

- smbmount commands work, and you can verify that the Linux box is connected to the filer. - The ls commands return unexpected output. For example, ls -l on an smbmount returns

[root@bombay InetPub]# ls -l ls: ~snapsho: No such file or directory ls: users1: No such file or directory total 0

The actual sub-directories in this directory are ~snapshot and users14.

- the smbumount command also has problems

[root@bombay InetPub]# smbumount /mnt/frick/InetPub Could not umount /mnt/frick/InetPub: Device or resource busy

-Stephen

-----Original Message----- From: Benn, Paul [mailto:paul.benn@netapp.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 1999 11:18 AM To: 'Sam Schorr'; Benn, Paul; 'toasters@mathworks.com' Cc: Stephen Wu; Mike Mcnelly Subject: RE: Linux, Samba and CIFS

You might want to consider upgrading to Data ONTAP 5.3.2. The smbmount command works with that version.

Out of curiosity, is there any reason that you would rather use CIFS than NFS to connect from a Linux box (assuming your filer is licensed for both)?

Regards,

Paul

-----Original Message----- From: Sam Schorr [mailto:sschorr@homestead.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 1999 10:49 AM To: 'Benn, Paul'; Sam Schorr; 'toasters@mathworks.com' Cc: Stephen Wu; Mike Mcnelly Subject: RE: Linux, Samba and CIFS

We are using Samba 2.0.3-8. the filers are running 5.2.1P2D6.

-----Original Message----- From: Benn, Paul [mailto:paul.benn@netapp.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 1999 10:46 AM To: 'Sam Schorr'; 'toasters@mathworks.com' Cc: Stephen Wu; Mike Mcnelly Subject: RE: Linux, Samba and CIFS

What are you using to mount the share? What version of Data ONTAP are you using?

Regards,

Paul

-----Original Message----- We're trying to get a Linux box, using Samba, to mount an NT share to our filers. We have been, quite successfully, accessing the filers from the NT domain they are in using normal UNC share names. We have also, successfully, mounted NT shares from the Linux box using Samba. The failure seems to be in some area of authentication on the part of the filers that is somehow unique to them as other NT systems are quite happy talking to the Linux/Samba mount.