Wow...Thanks Justin. I guess that was possibly an oversight when developed (and hence the RFE)? --tmac
*Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant*
*Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam*
*I Blog at TMACsRack https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/*
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:09 PM Parisi, Justin via Toasters < toasters@teaparty.net> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Parisi, Justin" Justin.Parisi@netapp.com To: Michael Bergman michael.bergman@ericsson.com, Toasters < toasters@teaparty.net> Cc: Bcc: Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:06:37 +0000 Subject: Re: FYI TR-4067 calls out this exact issue as well. There’s currently no way to “blacklist” inelegible interfaces for pnfs. If it’s in the SVM, it will be used with pNFS, regardless of if it’s reachable.
We have an open RFE to allow you to specify LIFs for pNFS to avoid this problem. In the meantime you can blacklist devices from the client as per page 54 of the tr.
https://www.netapp.com/pdf.html?item=/media/10720-tr-4067.pdf
*From:* Toasters toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of Michael Bergman via Toasters toasters@teaparty.net *Sent:* Monday, August 16, 2021 11:10:12 AM *To:* Toasters toasters@teaparty.net *Subject:*
NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Parisi, Justin via Toasters" toasters@teaparty.net To: Michael Bergman michael.bergman@ericsson.com, Toasters < toasters@teaparty.net> Cc: Bcc: Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:06:46 +0100 Subject: _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters