toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

3 participants
13514 discussions

RE: quota limits
by Bond, Andrew 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

Quotas can be applied either to an entire volume, or to qtrees within that volume. If a user exceeds either of these, the write will be denied. If you want to allow users to write more data to a qtree that would exceed their quota for the volume, you'll need to use a different volume for the qtree. Or to change the existing user quota to one that applies to a qtree instead of the whole volume. Of course, this also applies to group quotas. Regards, Andrew -----Original Message----- From: Clawson, Simon [mailto:simon_clawson@mentorg.com] Sent: 28 February 2001 09:44 To: 'Uros Lampret'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: quota limits Hi! I had the same issue a fw weeks ago. The key factor is how you have set the users quota's up. There are several caragories of quota I believe. If you have given each user a quoa, with the quota type user then anything they write, any where on the filer will be subtracted from thier quota. This is how I understand it, but I may be wrong... A way to get round this would be to give everyone a root account, but this is a bit dodgy as far as security goes... Simon -----Original Message----- From: Uros Lampret [mailto:uros.lampret@ourspace.si] Sent: Wednesday February 2001 06:51 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: quota limits Hi! My problem is that I have set up quotas for my users on F740 running Ontap 5.3.6r2. They each have 200Mb. But four users that work on a special project have extra space of 2Gb. I've set up a qtree with limit of 2Gb. But when the four users start to write, they hit their personal limits. Is there a work around? _____________________________ Uros Lampret _____________________________

1 0

RE: quota limits
by Clawson, Simon 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

Hi! I had the same issue a fw weeks ago. The key factor is how you have set the users quota's up. There are several caragories of quota I believe. If you have given each user a quoa, with the quota type user then anything they write, any where on the filer will be subtracted from thier quota. This is how I understand it, but I may be wrong... A way to get round this would be to give everyone a root account, but this is a bit dodgy as far as security goes... Simon -----Original Message----- From: Uros Lampret [mailto:uros.lampret@ourspace.si] Sent: Wednesday February 2001 06:51 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: quota limits Hi! My problem is that I have set up quotas for my users on F740 running Ontap 5.3.6r2. They each have 200Mb. But four users that work on a special project have extra space of 2Gb. I've set up a qtree with limit of 2Gb. But when the four users start to write, they hit their personal limits. Is there a work around? _____________________________ Uros Lampret _____________________________

1 0

RE: quota limits
by Traitel, Eyal 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

Can you post your /etc/quotas ? Eyal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- eTraitel - I'm the new eBuzzword around !!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Eyal Traitel - Filer Escalation Engineer CNA, MCSE, CSA, NACA Network Appliance BV Holland Office Center Kruisweg 799b 2132 NG, Hoofddorp The Netherlands Office: +31 23 567 9685 Cellular: +31 6 5497 2568 Email: eyal(a)netapp.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Get answers NOW! - NetApp On the Web - http://now.netapp.com <http://now.netapp.com/> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Uros Lampret [mailto:uros.lampret@ourspace.si] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:51 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: quota limits Hi! My problem is that I have set up quotas for my users on F740 running Ontap 5.3.6r2. They each have 200Mb. But four users that work on a special project have extra space of 2Gb. I've set up a qtree with limit of 2Gb. But when the four users start to write, they hit their personal limits. Is there a work around? _____________________________ Uros Lampret _____________________________

1 0

RE: NDMPcopy speed, GbE utilization
by Mohler, Jeff 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

Jeff: There is an RFE for a 'turbo' button (ALA 80286 days) Ive been meaning to ask for. *heh*

1 0

RE: NDMPcopy speed, GbE utilization
by Mohler, Jeff 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

*heh* Never? Or..not soon. That would be nearly a 6x improvement in how fast it operates on the recieving end. I dont knowd if it is a disk thing..a java thing..or what. But it stinks. -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Krueger [mailto:jkrueger@qualcomm.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 9:51 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NDMPcopy speed, GbE utilization Anyone want to speculate when we'll be able to fully light up a Gigabit Ethernet link with an NDMPcopy? Right now, a non-busy F630 is using about 45% CPU pumping 4-5 MBytes/sec through a single GbE link which is on the same switch blade as another single GbE link going into an F760 spending about 85% CPU to write it out. But I want to push something like 50MBytes/sec between the two. Is the problem that there isn't enough CPU to manage that GbE port or what? Does anyone else find this to be a pain in the butt? -- Jeff

1 0

NDMPcopy speed, GbE utilization
by Jeffrey Krueger 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

Anyone want to speculate when we'll be able to fully light up a Gigabit Ethernet link with an NDMPcopy? Right now, a non-busy F630 is using about 45% CPU pumping 4-5 MBytes/sec through a single GbE link which is on the same switch blade as another single GbE link going into an F760 spending about 85% CPU to write it out. But I want to push something like 50MBytes/sec between the two. Is the problem that there isn't enough CPU to manage that GbE port or what? Does anyone else find this to be a pain in the butt? -- Jeff

1 0

legato ndmp and filer
by neil lehrer 27 Feb '01

27 Feb '01

hi, we have loaded legato 6.01 on a solaris 2.6 box. we have attached a spectralogic treefrog by scsi to an f760 ontap5.36r2 filer. the filer sees the treefrog and its tape drives[2 ait2drives]. legato sees the treefrog, inventory commands work, but we cannot label any tapes, we just get back i/o error. has anybody gotten something like this to work with legato? thanks.

1 0

migration from netware 4.x to filer with ntfs security
by neil lehrer 27 Feb '01

27 Feb '01

hi, if anyone has migrated from a netware 4.x environment to a filer with ntfs security i'd really like to talk with you. thanks -- regards

1 0

migrating from unix to ntfs
by neil lehrer 27 Feb '01

27 Feb '01

i am migrating from sun servers with nfs clients to netapp server with ntfs security and cifs clients. if anybody has done this on a large scale i would like to hear from them. thanks. -- regards

1 0

Veritas Netbackup 3.4 for Solaris & Breecehill Q6.210 DLT Library
by Douglas Ritschel 27 Feb '01

27 Feb '01

Does anyone have experience with Veritas Netbackup 3.4 for Solaris and a Breecehill Q6.210 DLT Library? We have a Breecehill Q6.210 with 6 Quantum DLT 7000 drives in it. The first two drives are daisy chained to a NetApp 740. The second two are daisy chained to the robot, which is connected to a Sun 450, running Solaris 2.6. The third pair of drives are daisy chained to a NetApp 760. The problem, is that when I come in every Monday morning, after the our Full backups are scheduled to run, 4 of the 6 drives are reported as being down in Veritas Device Monitor. The 4 drives that are down are not the same every week. To get the backups going again, I have to shutdown the Veritas daemons, reboot the Library, reinventory the Library and Verites, then restart the backups that did not complete. The following day, after some of the backups completed, some of the drives are down again, and I have to repeat the process.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters