toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

RE: Quota Notifier
by Nail, Larry 08 May '01

08 May '01

Michael, Perl runs on Win32 as well... check out ActiveState.com. I've taken many Perl scripts & ported them over without any significant difficulties. The resource kits for NT/W2K are your valuable friends in these efforts as well. -----Original Message----- From: Honeycutt, Michael [mailto:MichaelHoneycutt@NC.SLR.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 7:43 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Quota Notifier Does anyone know of a program or tool that I could use to report to my users when they are close to their quota limit? These are NT clients, so I need something that will run from a windows platform. I have seen the perl scripts on the NOW site, but I am not familiar enough with Sun to make those scripts run correctly. Thanks. Michael Honeycutt MCSE/A+ NT/Exchange Engineer IBM Global Services

1 0

Quota Notifier
by Honeycutt, Michael 08 May '01

08 May '01

Does anyone know of a program or tool that I could use to report to my users when they are close to their quota limit? These are NT clients, so I need something that will run from a windows platform. I have seen the perl scripts on the NOW site, but I am not familiar enough with Sun to make those scripts run correctly. Thanks. Michael Honeycutt MCSE/A+ NT/Exchange Engineer IBM Global Services

1 0

RE: Maximum volume size
by Wedge, Cliff 07 May '01

07 May '01

What docs are you reading? Thanks, Cliff Cliff Wedge Technical Publications Manager Hardware Group Network Appliance 408.822.6839 cliff.wedge(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Leigh David Heyman [mailto:leigh@ai.mit.edu] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:56 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Maximum volume size So, I've been through some docs, and they seem to say that the maximum "recommended" size of a single volume is 250G. With 36G drives this equates to basically 1 volume per shelf???!?! Is this correct, or has the documentation in this regard not been updated? Does anyon know what this "recommendation" is based on? It doesn't seem very efficient. -Leigh ----------------------------- A nasty looking dwarf throws a knife at you.

1 0

Backup trouble - "Compression page" support
by Jered Heeschen 07 May '01

07 May '01

I connected a Magstar 3590 tape drive to the external SCSI port on an F760 running DataONTAP 6.02, and have been having trouble getting the filer to do more than recogize the tape's existence. The drive is recognized when I execute "mt -f nrst0a status", and shows up as I'd expect in "sysconfig -t", but any other tape operation fails. When I execute any "mt" command (including "status") I get the follownig error on the console: " [...:tape_admin:error]: tape 0.0: doesn't support compression page". I've tried mt with rewind and offline, and both fail. Attempting a dump yields a message that the tape is not writeable or is broken, and requests a new one. I've tried this with two different 3590 drives, two different SCSI cables, and three different tapes. I've also cycled through the different tape deivces (rst0a, urst0h, nrst0l, etc.) with no change. Anyone have an idea of what else I could try to get the tape drive and the F760 to get along? Jered Heeschen heeschen(a)us.ibm.com

1 0

Re: HSM with filers?
by SteveRoche＠datalink.com 07 May '01

07 May '01

Tom, This was sent to me some time ago from Darleen Cormier from Netapp. -steve Hi Steve, The reason that neither Veritas Storage Replicator or other HSM packages currently support HSM migration of data to and from NetApp filers is because DataONTAP does NOT support DMAPI protocol. DMAPI means Data Management Application Programming Interface and this along with the X/Open Data Storage Management (XDSM) standard allow HSM functionality across a wide range of operating environments without sacrificing system reliability. Without this, the HSM software has no idea of file attributes or location. This reason I'm giving you all this exciting info (YAWN) is that most, if not all, HSM packages use these protocols. Until NetApp is able to support these protocols, or the 3rd party companies are able to come up with some other way of doing HSM, we will not be able to offer an HSM solution to our customers. Now, Good news/ Bad News. The good news is we are receiving more and more requests for this functionality, and I do know that engineering is looking at possibly adding support for the DMAPI protocol. The bad news is that no date has been set for beginning to implement this. Sorry we can't tell you anything better. Steve Roche Senior Account Executive DataLink - Information Means The World http://www.datalink.com "Tom \"Mad Dog\" Yergeau" To: "'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> <MadDog(a)fool.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: HSM with filers? owner-toasters@mat hworks.com 05/04/01 01:47 AM I just took the NetApp backup survey that they sent out and one of the questions was about using hierarchical storage management with filers. Does anyone know of any HSM products out there that currently work with filers? Thanks, Tom

1 0

CIFS plaintext vs encrypted
by Frank Cusack 07 May '01

07 May '01

From http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3020.html: The NetApp filer requires plaintext password authentication from the client if the /etc/passwd file or NIS is used to provide CIFS client authentication on the filer. If the filer is configured to provide Pass-Through Authentication then any password entry in the /etc/passwd is ignored for NT authenticated CIFS clients. How do I know how my filer is configured? Also, what about NetLogon authentication? cifs testdc does find my domain controller, but does that mean it is in the domain? Also, cifsconfig.cfg: cifs setup -w x.x.x.x -security unix -cp 437 Oooh, I'll bet that means plaintext (against local /etc/passwd). Hope not. I realize my question may be incomplete. :\ thx /fc

1 0

dump/restore inode question
by Avi Freedman 05 May '01

05 May '01

Perhaps a stupid question, but if I restore a dump from a tape/file to a volume on a netapp, and there are inode number conflicts (because the existing volume has a bunch o' files), will the files with duplicate inode numbers be blown away? Thanks, Avi

2 1

NNTP question
by Avi Freedman 05 May '01

05 May '01

For people running netcaches with NNTP support, I was wondering about how many simultaenous users worth of activity you've been able to support on 600/700-series netcaches. Thanks, Avi

1 0

Large volume performance
by Tom McDonald 05 May '01

05 May '01

Hello, We have a need to create a very large volume (800+ GB) on one of our F760 Filers for NFS only use. I plan on creating a volume with 5 RAID groups, each with 14 18-GB disks, that will span across two fibre channel adapters. RAID groups will not span across adaptors. I am wondering what kind of performance should expect as a result of having such a large volume across two adapters. Any thoughts? Thanks, Tom

1 0

Networker Unsuccessful Save Sets
by Nicholas Chua 04 May '01

04 May '01

I have been getting the following error lately on Networker, any clues on where to start looking for the cause? ############################################################################ #### NetWorker Savegroup: (alert) NetApp completed, 1 client(s) (netapp1 Failed) Start time: Wed May 2 21:00:00 2001 End time: Wed May 2 21:04:15 2001 --- Unsuccessful Save Sets --- * netapp1:/vol/vol0/etc 1 retry attempted * netapp1:/vol/vol0/etc save not found. Type '?' for a list of commands * netapp1:/vol/vol0/pdmdb 1 retry attempted * netapp1:/vol/vol0/pdmdb save not found. Type '?' for a list of commands * netapp1:/vol/vol0/audio_pdm 1 retry attempted * netapp1:/vol/vol0/audio_pdm save not found. Type '?' for a list of commands --- Successful Save Sets --- server1: /nsr/index/netapp1 level=9, 185 KB 00:04:06 5 files ############################################################################ #### The following error shows up on the Failed Saved Sets under Group Control Details netapp1 /vol/vol0 unexpectedly exited:incr:save netapp1:/vol/vol0/etc level=incr, pool=Default, save as of Tue May 1 23:53:59 GMT+0800 2001 Thanks in advanced for your help. Regards, Nic

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters