toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

RE: CIFS terminate for WTS
by Nail, Larry 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

I have to agree with the CLI part of it... I abhor the mouse. However for mouse jockies, an alternative is: An alternative is to use the Computer Management MMC for Windows 2000 (right click my computer, manage, action, connect to another computer, expand shared folders, Sessions) to view the sessions. Limited to screen size if you hide the left pane. You can also sort by column. I customized an MMC to include the Shared Folders & Local Users and Groups snap-ins for quick access. Larry ______________________________________ Lawrence D. Nail Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer NT Infrastructure and Strategy SC Design Systems Texas Instruments Incorporated -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Krueger [mailto:jkrueger@qualcomm.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:54 PM To: Jeffrey Krueger Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: CIFS terminate for WTS Thanks for all the responses! For the lists benefit, the conclusion was that this has to be done through the Server Manager but that an ONTAP RFE for a "cifs terminate" style command exists. Since a few folks asked "If it works, why not just use Server Manager?" I'll give a public response. While Server Manager works, it is not very practical when you have a good number of connections. For instance, on the machine in question, there were 2,448 sessions open when I was trying to kill a few. I could easily pick them out via the command line "rsh filer cifs sessions" and some creative regex's. In server manager, I have a four-line view of this list. Just finding the connections in question was a chore of scrolling and manually reading each line. It was a pain. I'm not dogging GUI's - they're great for a number of things. This is one task they are not well suited for. Personally, I prefer grep to do my pattern matching for me since it is abundantly more accurate and lightning fast in comparison to me manually reading each line. So, a CLI alternative would be great! =) -- Jeff On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:52:38AM -0700, Jeffrey Krueger wrote: > Does anyone know how to terminate one connection of a multiplexed CIFS > session from an NT workstation (such as a WTS server)? That is, many > users are logged into a WTS server, but I only want to terminate one. > > This can be done "fairly easily" from the NT Server Manager console; > however, I'm looking for a "rsh filer cifs terminate ..." varient. > > Any ideas? > > -- Jeff > >

2 1

CIFS terminate for WTS
by Jeffrey Krueger 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

Does anyone know how to terminate one connection of a multiplexed CIFS session from an NT workstation (such as a WTS server)? That is, many users are logged into a WTS server, but I only want to terminate one. This can be done "fairly easily" from the NT Server Manager console; however, I'm looking for a "rsh filer cifs terminate ..." varient. Any ideas? -- Jeff

1 1

console connexion to F740 kibbled
by Lance R Bailey 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

we have a new F740 that i cannot use on the console of my lightwave CS800 terminal server. i am using the same CS800 to front a pair of F720 without problems but the F740 seems to put out text with the high bit set - completely unreadable. the F720's are fine. CS800 _| | |_ | | | F720 F720 F740 the connexion from the filers to the cs800 is a cat5 cable that plugs into the back of the CS800, and then into an RJ-db9 adapter which in turn plugs into the back of a filer. if i unplug the adapter from the working 720 and plug it into the 740, then i get gibberish on that port. if i unplug the adapter from the gibberish 740 and plug it into the 720, suddenly that connexion works. ie, if i do this: CS800 _| \/ | /\ F720 F720 F740 the problem stays with the 740. we swapped out the motherboard - no good. we swapped out the entire head - no good. we changed cables, adapters - no good. we changed ports on the CS800 - no good. both ports on the CS800 are 9600 8N1. we attached a laptop directly to the F740 with a filer supplied cable and that worked. for some reason, it seems that the CS800 and the F740 (but not the F720) have a high order bit problem. has anyone seen this? even better, has anyone seen a solution to this? -- email: lance_bailey(a)pmc-sierra.com box: Lance R. Bailey, unix Administrator vox: +1 604 415 6646 PMC-Sierra, Inc fax: +1 604 415 6151 105-8555 Baxter Place http://www.lydia.org/~zaphod Burnaby BC, V5A 4V7 Everywhere is walking distance if you have the time -- Steven Wright

3 2

Permissions
by Jennifer Armenta 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

Having issues with permissions. When trying to mount to 2 different SUN servers (Unix mode /vol/vol2/backup) It doesn't appear the id's are being picked up correctly any advice?

1 0

RE: Unexplainable unresponsiveness of F820
by Ehrhart, Rick 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

The problem is fixed in 6.1.1 with bug 40350 which also covers disconnecting telnet while there is pending output. - Rick - ----------------------------------------------------------------- Rick Ehrhart Network Appliance "Give me bandwidth or give me death" > -----Original Message----- > From: Kerry Schwab [mailto:Kerry.Schwab@wnco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:33 PM > To: mcope(a)isisph.com > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: Unexplainable unresponsiveness of F820 > > > When I have run into the bug, it didn't seem to have anything > to do with how busy the filer was. > > It *did* seem to be related to pending output on the telnet > connection. So, if you connected, ran a command, and > then closed the telnet connection while the filer was still > sending results, the filer would freeze. > > Another scenario is when "console log" messages randomly > stream from the telnet conneciton. Closing the connection > while the console logs message is being written triggers it also. > > It interesting that you mentioned "Big Brother", because I never > hit the bug while actually typing interactively via telnet. > It was always > via some automated telnet connection ( Expect, Perl, etc). I guess > a human typing always tends to wait before sending the <ctrl-D>, while > the scripted connections aren't anticipating "extra output". > > == > Kerry > > > >>> <mcope(a)isisph.com> 09/05/01 04:46PM >>> > > > Kerry, > > Thanks for the info. I use Big Brother (bb4.com) to monitor > the Filers. One of > the things it does every 5 minutes is open and close a telnet > session to test > telnet. It's a pretty ugly method because it just kills the > telnet session as > opposed to closing it. The problems on the previous Filer > only manifested when > it was getting hammered. I've been using Big Brother for a > number of months now > and haven't had any problems keeping telnet sessions open to > a Filer. However, > I can imagine where this could be a problem if the Filer is > really busy and then > one of these ugly telnet checks occurred and pushed it over the edge. > > Thanks again, > > Michael > > On 9/5/2001 2:16:07 PM, "Kerry Schwab" <Kerry.Schwab(a)wnco.com> wrote: > > I've run into a bug with the telnetd daemon on the F820. > > Closing a telnet session to the filer while it has pending > > output sometimes causes the whole filer to "hang". > > > > This is occuring on 6.0.1R3. > > > > I did find some related bugs in the knowledge base, > > but I've resorted to not using the telnet interface for now. > > > > == > > Kerry > > > > > > > > > > >>> <mcope(a)isisph.com> 09/05/01 10:46AM >>> > > > > > > I've recently moved files from a F740 onto a new F820. > This happened > > on Monday > > and on Tuesday morning the F820 suddenly stopped serving data. It > > became so > > unresponsive that I was unable to even get in thru the console. I > > got prompted > > for a password but it never got to a command line prompt. The Filer > > didn't > > appear to be excessively busy beforehand and the network connection > > (Gigabit) > > still appeared to be fine. Basically, the Filer appeared fine > > externally and > > the LCD panel showed that there were 0 ops a second. The only way I > > could get > > the Filer "running" again was to cycle power. > > > > The Filer has been fine since then. There were no messages in the > > syslog and it > > didn't dump a core file (I know now how to force it to dump > a core for > > diagnosis), so NetApp tech support hasn't been able to provide much > > assistance > > or explanation. > > > > I've seen this same behavior twice on the the F740 in the last 2 > > months but that > > had been diagnosed as a faulty Fibre Channel controller seizing up > > when the > > workload got too high. Other than the actual data files, the only > > thing these > > two Filers have in common is Data ONTAP 6.1R1. I'm running 6.1R1 on > > two other > > Filers and have had no problems. It just seems very coincidental > > that I didn't > > experience this on the F740 until after I installed this version of > > ONTAP. > > > > Anyone else seen this behavior before or noticed any irregularities > > with 6.1R1 > > (I'm not running in a cluster so the latest updates/bug fixes don't > > appear > > helpful) > > > > Thanx, > > > > > > Michael Cope > > UNIX/Linux Systems Administrator > > Isis Pharmaceuticals > > mcope(a)isisph.com > > > > UNIX is very user friendly... > > it's just highly selective about who it makes friends WITH! > > > > > > > > >

1 0

RE: Looking for Macintosh users
by Maglinger, Paul 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

Thanks to all who responded. Our Macs are currently running system 9.X, and they are hesitant to upgrade to 10.X until it's been out for awhile and the bugs have been worked out. It looks like we're going to lean toward DAVE as it looks as if that will integrate them more fully into our existing network. Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com To: "'NetApps list server'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> cc: (bcc: Michael Cope/ISIS) Subject: Looking for Macintosh users We're looking to let our Art Department (Macintosh users) have a wee bit o' space on our 740. I'm looking at Dave software, but would appreciate any input from other administrators who might have some insight here. Thanks! Paul Maglinger, A+, CET, CA, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival, Inc. - att1.htm

1 0

RE: Looking for Macintosh users
by Mike Sphar 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

For the record, netatalk is available for some other UNIX platforms besides linux as well. Solaris and Ultrix, for example. -----Original Message----- From: Braunschweiger, Udo [mailto:udo@netapp.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:49 AM To: 'Maglinger, Paul'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: Looking for Macintosh users Hello Paul we also have some customers in Switzerland which are using MAC's with Filer. The best way to implement the connection depends on what you are doing with the MacIntosh Computers. If most of your environment is Windows-Based (NT- or 2000) and only a few Mac-Clients and -users want to get access to MS-Office Files, DAVE ( www.thursby.com <http://www.thursby.com> ) is great. Advantages: With an existing Windows Domain, no other authentication method and maintenance of user accounts is necessary. No other license (beside CIFS) for the filer is needed. Disadvantages: On every Client you will need to install the DAVE-Software and you have to buy the licenses as well. If most of your environment are unix-workstations with propagating the passwd-file by NIS and only a few Mac-Clients and -users want to get access to Unix-Files, MACnfs (also www.Thursby.com <http://www.Thursby.com> ) is great. Advantages: With an existing NIS Domain, no other authentication method and maintenance of user accounts is necessary. No other license (beside nfs) for the filer is needed. Disadvantages: On every Client you will need to install a MACnfs-Software and you have to buy the licenses as well. If you need good performance, the Thursby Clients are a little bit to slow i guess. If there is some good Unix-Know How arround, you can buy Ethershare from Helios ( www.helios.com <http://www.helios.com> ). It usually runs on solaris platforms and can provide File- and Print-Services for Macintosh. If the clients handle big picture files (to create Newspapers), the Ethershare offers some interesting features to improve the performance over the network. The other solution is based on Linux. The shareware netatalk also provides good performance on File-Services for MAC. You need a good level of experience with linux. If you can wait some weeks and take the risk to upgrade your Mac-Clients with an very new OS-release, you can use MAC OS10 to connect with nfs or MAC OS10.1 to connect with cifs. But maybe your applications does not run on this new releases. I hope, i did not increase the confusion......... Regards Udo -----Original Message----- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:PMAGLINGER@scvl.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2001 00:17 To: 'NetApps list server' Subject: Looking for Macintosh users We're looking to let our Art Department (Macintosh users) have a wee bit o' space on our 740. I'm looking at Dave software, but would appreciate any input from other administrators who might have some insight here. Thanks! Paul Maglinger, A+, CET, CA, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival, Inc.

1 0

Re: netapp bad disk bug
by Seth Moskowitz 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

I believe we ran nto a similar problem which was fixed when I upgraded OnTap and the Firmware >From: Ozzie Sabina <ors(a)cimedia.com> >To: Collin LeGault <clegault(a)corp.earthlink.net>, toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: Re: netapp bad disk bug >Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 15:03:06 -0400 > > >+-- Collin LeGault <clegault(a)corp.earthlink.net> once said: >| I have a couple of netapps that are doing this same weird thing. They >both >| are reporting a bad disk, and when you replace the disk, the red light >comes >| on for the new disk, and the netapp marks it as a broken disk. They are >| F760, running 5.3.5R3 of ontap. Someone thought we should take a down >| time and reboot them to see if that fixed it, but I wanted to avoid the >huge >| amount of work that would be and see if anyone here has any suggestions. >| If you need more information about the filers to figure this out, let me >know > >I've had similar problem in the past (new disk was not recognized at >all - looked like an empty slot to the filer) and it was eventually >tracked down to a bad LRC. If this is a clustered system, see if the >other filer is seeing the disk. > >Oz > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

1 0

RE: Looking for Macintosh users
by Phil Hill 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

Hello, feedback from a customer: in the past they used helios, but they moved to xinet ( www.xinet.com ). The performance is execlent and you can use the Snapshot-Feature from the NetApp Filer. Xinet is running on a Solaris-client which has mounted the Filer. The Solaris-box exports the mount via xinet to the Apples. Ciao Phil

1 0

RE: Looking for Macintosh users
by Braunschweiger, Udo 06 Sep '01

06 Sep '01

Hello Paul we also have some customers in Switzerland which are using MAC's with Filer. The best way to implement the connection depends on what you are doing with the MacIntosh Computers. If most of your environment is Windows-Based (NT- or 2000) and only a few Mac-Clients and -users want to get access to MS-Office Files, DAVE ( www.thursby.com <http://www.thursby.com> ) is great. Advantages: With an existing Windows Domain, no other authentication method and maintenance of user accounts is necessary. No other license (beside CIFS) for the filer is needed. Disadvantages: On every Client you will need to install the DAVE-Software and you have to buy the licenses as well. If most of your environment are unix-workstations with propagating the passwd-file by NIS and only a few Mac-Clients and -users want to get access to Unix-Files, MACnfs (also www.Thursby.com <http://www.Thursby.com> ) is great. Advantages: With an existing NIS Domain, no other authentication method and maintenance of user accounts is necessary. No other license (beside nfs) for the filer is needed. Disadvantages: On every Client you will need to install a MACnfs-Software and you have to buy the licenses as well. If you need good performance, the Thursby Clients are a little bit to slow i guess. If there is some good Unix-Know How arround, you can buy Ethershare from Helios ( www.helios.com <http://www.helios.com> ). It usually runs on solaris platforms and can provide File- and Print-Services for Macintosh. If the clients handle big picture files (to create Newspapers), the Ethershare offers some interesting features to improve the performance over the network. The other solution is based on Linux. The shareware netatalk also provides good performance on File-Services for MAC. You need a good level of experience with linux. If you can wait some weeks and take the risk to upgrade your Mac-Clients with an very new OS-release, you can use MAC OS10 to connect with nfs or MAC OS10.1 to connect with cifs. But maybe your applications does not run on this new releases. I hope, i did not increase the confusion......... Regards Udo -----Original Message----- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:PMAGLINGER@scvl.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2001 00:17 To: 'NetApps list server' Subject: Looking for Macintosh users We're looking to let our Art Department (Macintosh users) have a wee bit o' space on our 740. I'm looking at Dave software, but would appreciate any input from other administrators who might have some insight here. Thanks! Paul Maglinger, A+, CET, CA, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival, Inc.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters