toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

RE: Script to delete snapshots for Exchange
by jwitham＠takedapharm.com 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Hi Mustafa: Which version of SnapManager are you using? The newer one lets you specify the amount of snapshots to keep via the '-d X' command. HTH, -john John Witham Sr. Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. e://jwitham@takedapharm.com -----Original Message----- From: Sayla, Mustafa [mailto:MSAYLA@mesirowfinancial.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:31 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Script to delete snapshots for Exchange Is anybody using a script to delete snapshot made by snap manager for exchange ver 1.01. At present I am deleting it manually once it reaches 31 but if somebody has a script that does it automatically that would be great. Mustafa This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

1 0

Script to delete snapshots for Exchange
by Sayla, Mustafa 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Is anybody using a script to delete snapshot made by snap manager for exchange ver 1.01. At present I am deleting it manually once it reaches 31 but if somebody has a script that does it automatically that would be great. Mustafa

1 0

lock manager not registered
by Ambrose_Earle＠shamrockfoods.com 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Anyone know what this means or what might cause it? This is a server that has been running fine, but all of a sudden a few of these showed up in /etc/messages. Tue Apr 2 09:13:47 MST [sourdough: nlm_send:error]: Lock manager version 4 (for UDP) not registered at host 172.17.4.30 Tue Apr 2 09:14:17 MST last message repeated 3 times

3 2

RE: lock manager not registered
by Roufay, Charles 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Hi, This seems to be a service that is not registered with the port mapper. charles -----Original Message----- From: Ambrose_Earle(a)shamrockfoods.com [mailto:Ambrose_Earle@shamrockfoods.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:58 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: lock manager not registered Anyone know what this means or what might cause it? This is a server that has been running fine, but all of a sudden a few of these showed up in /etc/messages. Tue Apr 2 09:13:47 MST [sourdough: nlm_send:error]: Lock manager version 4 (for UDP) not registered at host 172.17.4.30 Tue Apr 2 09:14:17 MST last message repeated 3 times

1 0

RE: FLOW CONTROL
by nick.mayrath＠webmd.net 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

What kind of benefit does setting 'receive' to 'desired' bring? "Eff Norwood" <effrem.norwood@cyn To: <mlelstv(a)xlink.net>, "Noll, Kevin" <kevin.noll(a)cgey.com> aptic.com> cc: "'Toasters \(E-mail\)'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent by: Subject: RE: FLOW CONTROL owner-toasters@math works.com 04/02/2002 02:14 PM By default Cisco sets flow control to enable on the send side only. To enable flowcontrol in both directions as desired: set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 send desired set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 receive desired If you are going to make these kinds of changes to other switches in your network, do the far ends first so you don't get dropped. Eff Norwood > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Michael van Elst > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:32 AM > To: Noll, Kevin > Cc: 'mlelstv(a)xlink.net'; 'Toasters (E-mail)' > Subject: Re: FLOW CONTROL > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:19:59PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote: > > Sorry, are you refering to the desired and off, or are you > saying that it > > should be enabled? > > I am referring to the combination: > > send desired > receive off > > Greetings, > Michael van Elst > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael van Elst [mailto:mlelstv@xlink.net] > > Sent: 02 April 2002 14:21 > > To: Noll, Kevin > > Cc: 'Toasters (E-mail)' > > Subject: Re: FLOW CONTROL > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote: > > > Hi All > > > > > > > > > We are standardized with Sun and Cisco equipment. All > equipment on our > > > Database Vlans are using Gig Ethernet. Flow control on our > sun servers > > are > > > set to on. However, on our Cisco Switches, the settings are > as follows. > > > > > > set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 send desired > > > > > > set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 receive off > > > > > > > > > I am not a cisco engineer, but would like to know if this is > correct. I > > > believe it should be both on. > > > > > > This is the configuration that was necessary on our site (and the same > > with IOS-based switches). It was also recommended by our local NetApp > > people. > > > > I guess this makes it as 'correct' as possible. > > > > > > Greetings, > > -- > > i.A. Michael van Elst / phone: +49 721 9652 330 > > Xlink - Network Information Centre \/ fax: +49 721 9652 349 > > Emmy-Noether-Strasse 9 /\ link http://nic.xlink.net/ > > D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany /_______ email: > hostmaster(a)xlink.net > > [ KPNQwest Germany GmbH, Sitz Karlsruhe > ] > > [ Amtsgericht Karlsruhe HRB 8161, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael > Mueller-Berg ] > > > > > > > ****************************************************************** > ************************** > > " This message contains information that may be privileged or > confidential and > > is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is > intended only for > > the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended > recipient, you > > are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, > distribute, or use > > this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message > in error, please > > notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ". > > > ****************************************************************** > ************************** > -- > i.A. Michael van Elst / phone: +49 721 9652 330 > Xlink - Network Information Centre \/ fax: +49 721 9652 349 > Emmy-Noether-Strasse 9 /\ link http://nic.xlink.net/ > D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany /_______ email: > hostmaster(a)xlink.net > [ KPNQwest Germany GmbH, Sitz Karlsruhe > ] > [ Amtsgericht Karlsruhe HRB 8161, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael > Mueller-Berg ]

2 1

RE: FLOW CONTROL
by Noll, Kevin 02 Apr '02

02 Apr '02

Sorry, are you refering to the desired and off, or are you saying that it should be enabled? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Michael van Elst [mailto:mlelstv@xlink.net] Sent: 02 April 2002 14:21 To: Noll, Kevin Cc: 'Toasters (E-mail)' Subject: Re: FLOW CONTROL On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote: > Hi All > > > We are standardized with Sun and Cisco equipment. All equipment on our > Database Vlans are using Gig Ethernet. Flow control on our sun servers are > set to on. However, on our Cisco Switches, the settings are as follows. > > set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 send desired > > set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 receive off > > > I am not a cisco engineer, but would like to know if this is correct. I > believe it should be both on. This is the configuration that was necessary on our site (and the same with IOS-based switches). It was also recommended by our local NetApp people. I guess this makes it as 'correct' as possible. Greetings, -- i.A. Michael van Elst / phone: +49 721 9652 330 Xlink - Network Information Centre \/ fax: +49 721 9652 349 Emmy-Noether-Strasse 9 /\ link http://nic.xlink.net/ D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany /_______ email: hostmaster(a)xlink.net [ KPNQwest Germany GmbH, Sitz Karlsruhe ] [ Amtsgericht Karlsruhe HRB 8161, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael Mueller-Berg ] ******************************************************************************************** " This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ". ********************************************************************************************

3 2

spinning spares..
by kevin graham 02 Apr '02

02 Apr '02

Does anyone know if OnTAP spins down spares? IIRC, when I've pulled spares in the past, they were definately spinning. I can't say for sure why this is bothering me, but it would seem that leaving them idle would be a good thing.. From looking at specs, even older drives will be ready in NLT 20s, which isn't enough to seriously impact rebuild times, and the drive is still available for non-media access commands, so it seems like an all 'round good idea.. Is there something I'm overlooking, or is this completely inconsequential in the grand scheme of things? ..kg..

2 1

qtree
by pkeim(contr-ird) 02 Apr '02

02 Apr '02

Is there a way to quickly determine the amount of disk space consumed by each qtrees without having to use Windows Explorer? We don't have quotas enabled, so I can't use "quota report". We have an F840 with 6.1.2R1 (I have a feeling I'm going to regret asking this because the answer is so easy, but I can't find it!)

2 1

RE: adding different drive sizes to an existing volume
by Joe Luchtenberg 02 Apr '02

02 Apr '02

This exceeds the max capacity of the F740. You could get away with 3x FC9 shelves with 36GB drives and 2x shelves with 18GB drives. See http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/hardware/NetApp/syscfg/scdot612/ind ex.htm. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. Email: joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com Phone: 757-457-0504 (direct line) 757-858-0600 (front desk) 757-285-1223 (mobile) Fax: 757-858-0606 Please visit us at www.data-line.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Hester [mailto:erich@nuvox.net] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:36 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: adding different drive sizes to an existing volume > > > I have an F740 with 3 FC9 shelves loaded with 18gig drives. > I have 3 FC9 shelves loaded with 36gig drives from another > netapp I want > to move to the F740. > > If I add these drives to an existing volume but make them > their own raid > group, and leave one 36gig spare, that will not cause me any heartache > will it? > > -- > Eric Hester > Director of Systems Engineering > NuVox Communications, Inc. > 864.331.8171 eric(a)nuvox.net >

2 1

adding different drive sizes to an existing volume
by Eric Hester 02 Apr '02

02 Apr '02

I have an F740 with 3 FC9 shelves loaded with 18gig drives. I have 3 FC9 shelves loaded with 36gig drives from another netapp I want to move to the F740. If I add these drives to an existing volume but make them their own raid group, and leave one 36gig spare, that will not cause me any heartache will it? -- Eric Hester Director of Systems Engineering NuVox Communications, Inc. 864.331.8171 eric(a)nuvox.net

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters