toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

RE: One more netbackup question...
by Carruthers, Paul A 04 Apr '02

04 Apr '02

What version of Netbackup are you using? We have the same issue on 3.4 but I think it's because the NDMP version implmented in it is v2... -----Original Message----- From: Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com [mailto:Don.Hickey@alcatel.com] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:25 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: One more netbackup question... I find restoring from a tape extraordinarly slowwwww. I have home directories on a clustered pair of F840 running 6.1.1r2. I have several volumes at about 300gb usable. When I need to restore a file from a users directory it can take up to 6+ hours (DLT 8000). It appears most of the time is taken searching for the files... is there anything you can suggest (including any white papers) to speed up this process? thanks again Don

1 0

can NIS user and local user function at the same time ?
by Zhonghua-Dennis.Huang＠nokia.com 04 Apr '02

04 Apr '02

Hi toasters, I use Windows domain server to authenticate my filer users, and there is a unix qtree which I configured to be the users' home dir. my filer is also a NIS client in a Unix domain. Now I add some entries to the filer's local passwd file, and these users want to map their home dirs from their windows laptop. The problem is when they are mapping, some of them succeeded, some failed because they can not pass the authentication The passwd file is like this root:x:0:1::/: nobody::65535:65535::/: abzhang::25073:39::/: martma::25269:39::/: johli:25270:39::/: the nsswitch file is like this #Auto-generated by NIS Tue Mar 26 10:12:13 GMT 2002 hosts: files nis dns passwd: files nis netgroup: files nis group: files nis shadow: files nis Could anyone help ?

2 1

RE: Daylight Saving Time and ClearCase
by Koepnick, Victoria 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Jason, I have spoken to some of my contacts (ClearCase development engineers) at Rational and there are no issues with ClearCase and DST either on filers or other storage platforms. NetApp filers have been certified for use in a ClearCase environment since 1996 and I am not aware of any DST issues as a result of using NetApp with ClearCase. Victoria J. Koepnick Network Appliance Manager, Technical Markets 408-822-6465 -----Original Message----- From: Knight, Jason [mailto:Jason.Knight@citadelgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:58 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: FW: Daylight Saving Time and ClearCase Importance: High Has anyone else using ClearCase on a NetApp experienced this??? If you are using ClearCase on Netapp and haven't that would be good to know too... Thanks, Jason -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:37 PM To: Subject: Daylight Saving Time and ClearCase Importance: High This is an advanced notice that DST is coming on Sunday April 7th. We expect a problem with ClearCase and DST. Specifically, all files in your views will become hijacked after the time change. We have been working with Rational to resolve this situation. We have narrow the problem down to the interaction between ClearCase and the NetApp that the users' views resides. The area that we are specifically focusing into is how NetApp is handling DST. In the mean time, between now and April 7th, please check in all files in your view. After the DST has occured, please follow the procedures below to update your view ONLY if you have checked in ALL your files. If you still have files checked out, please contact me for assistance. - Open up ClearCase Home Base. - Click on Views Tab. - Click on Update Snapshot View button. - In "Start Update" window, select your view to be updated. - Click on Advanced Tab. - Select "Delete hijacked files and load selected versions from the VOB". - Select "Set file times to current time". - Click OK to update. This message will be sent out again on Wednesday 4/3 and Friday 4/5. If you are leaving on vacation for next week, please have all your files checked in by end of tomorrow! Please note that checking in your files DOES NOT mean you are submitting your changes to the build. To submit to the nitely build, you'll continue to follow standard procedures. "Cross the abyss."

1 0

Backing up to netapp controlled drivers...
by Don.Hickey＠alcatel.com 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

With netbackup, is it possible to backup a unix system (eg: solaris) to a tape device which is direct connected to the netapp? What I'm trying to do is to connect a DLT7000 to a netapp F740. Using netbackup I want to backup the netapp but also backup sun machines that reside elsewhere on the network. Thanks in advance for any tips. don

2 1

FW: Daylight Saving Time and ClearCase
by Knight, Jason 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Has anyone else using ClearCase on a NetApp experienced this??? If you are using ClearCase on Netapp and haven't that would be good to know too... Thanks, Jason -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:37 PM To: Subject: Daylight Saving Time and ClearCase Importance: High This is an advanced notice that DST is coming on Sunday April 7th. We expect a problem with ClearCase and DST. Specifically, all files in your views will become hijacked after the time change. We have been working with Rational to resolve this situation. We have narrow the problem down to the interaction between ClearCase and the NetApp that the users' views resides. The area that we are specifically focusing into is how NetApp is handling DST. In the mean time, between now and April 7th, please check in all files in your view. After the DST has occured, please follow the procedures below to update your view ONLY if you have checked in ALL your files. If you still have files checked out, please contact me for assistance. - Open up ClearCase Home Base. - Click on Views Tab. - Click on Update Snapshot View button. - In "Start Update" window, select your view to be updated. - Click on Advanced Tab. - Select "Delete hijacked files and load selected versions from the VOB". - Select "Set file times to current time". - Click OK to update. This message will be sent out again on Wednesday 4/3 and Friday 4/5. If you are leaving on vacation for next week, please have all your files checked in by end of tomorrow! Please note that checking in your files DOES NOT mean you are submitting your changes to the build. To submit to the nitely build, you'll continue to follow standard procedures. "Cross the abyss."

1 0

RE: Script to delete snapshots for Exchange
by jwitham＠takedapharm.com 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Hi Mustafa: Which version of SnapManager are you using? The newer one lets you specify the amount of snapshots to keep via the '-d X' command. HTH, -john John Witham Sr. Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. e://jwitham@takedapharm.com -----Original Message----- From: Sayla, Mustafa [mailto:MSAYLA@mesirowfinancial.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:31 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Script to delete snapshots for Exchange Is anybody using a script to delete snapshot made by snap manager for exchange ver 1.01. At present I am deleting it manually once it reaches 31 but if somebody has a script that does it automatically that would be great. Mustafa This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

1 0

Script to delete snapshots for Exchange
by Sayla, Mustafa 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Is anybody using a script to delete snapshot made by snap manager for exchange ver 1.01. At present I am deleting it manually once it reaches 31 but if somebody has a script that does it automatically that would be great. Mustafa

1 0

lock manager not registered
by Ambrose_Earle＠shamrockfoods.com 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Anyone know what this means or what might cause it? This is a server that has been running fine, but all of a sudden a few of these showed up in /etc/messages. Tue Apr 2 09:13:47 MST [sourdough: nlm_send:error]: Lock manager version 4 (for UDP) not registered at host 172.17.4.30 Tue Apr 2 09:14:17 MST last message repeated 3 times

3 2

RE: lock manager not registered
by Roufay, Charles 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Hi, This seems to be a service that is not registered with the port mapper. charles -----Original Message----- From: Ambrose_Earle(a)shamrockfoods.com [mailto:Ambrose_Earle@shamrockfoods.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:58 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: lock manager not registered Anyone know what this means or what might cause it? This is a server that has been running fine, but all of a sudden a few of these showed up in /etc/messages. Tue Apr 2 09:13:47 MST [sourdough: nlm_send:error]: Lock manager version 4 (for UDP) not registered at host 172.17.4.30 Tue Apr 2 09:14:17 MST last message repeated 3 times

1 0

RE: FLOW CONTROL
by nick.mayrath＠webmd.net 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

What kind of benefit does setting 'receive' to 'desired' bring? "Eff Norwood" <effrem.norwood@cyn To: <mlelstv(a)xlink.net>, "Noll, Kevin" <kevin.noll(a)cgey.com> aptic.com> cc: "'Toasters \(E-mail\)'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent by: Subject: RE: FLOW CONTROL owner-toasters@math works.com 04/02/2002 02:14 PM By default Cisco sets flow control to enable on the send side only. To enable flowcontrol in both directions as desired: set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 send desired set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 receive desired If you are going to make these kinds of changes to other switches in your network, do the far ends first so you don't get dropped. Eff Norwood > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Michael van Elst > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:32 AM > To: Noll, Kevin > Cc: 'mlelstv(a)xlink.net'; 'Toasters (E-mail)' > Subject: Re: FLOW CONTROL > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:19:59PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote: > > Sorry, are you refering to the desired and off, or are you > saying that it > > should be enabled? > > I am referring to the combination: > > send desired > receive off > > Greetings, > Michael van Elst > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael van Elst [mailto:mlelstv@xlink.net] > > Sent: 02 April 2002 14:21 > > To: Noll, Kevin > > Cc: 'Toasters (E-mail)' > > Subject: Re: FLOW CONTROL > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Noll, Kevin wrote: > > > Hi All > > > > > > > > > We are standardized with Sun and Cisco equipment. All > equipment on our > > > Database Vlans are using Gig Ethernet. Flow control on our > sun servers > > are > > > set to on. However, on our Cisco Switches, the settings are > as follows. > > > > > > set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 send desired > > > > > > set port flowcontrol 2/1-12 receive off > > > > > > > > > I am not a cisco engineer, but would like to know if this is > correct. I > > > believe it should be both on. > > > > > > This is the configuration that was necessary on our site (and the same > > with IOS-based switches). It was also recommended by our local NetApp > > people. > > > > I guess this makes it as 'correct' as possible. > > > > > > Greetings, > > -- > > i.A. Michael van Elst / phone: +49 721 9652 330 > > Xlink - Network Information Centre \/ fax: +49 721 9652 349 > > Emmy-Noether-Strasse 9 /\ link http://nic.xlink.net/ > > D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany /_______ email: > hostmaster(a)xlink.net > > [ KPNQwest Germany GmbH, Sitz Karlsruhe > ] > > [ Amtsgericht Karlsruhe HRB 8161, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael > Mueller-Berg ] > > > > > > > ****************************************************************** > ************************** > > " This message contains information that may be privileged or > confidential and > > is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is > intended only for > > the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended > recipient, you > > are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, > distribute, or use > > this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message > in error, please > > notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ". > > > ****************************************************************** > ************************** > -- > i.A. Michael van Elst / phone: +49 721 9652 330 > Xlink - Network Information Centre \/ fax: +49 721 9652 349 > Emmy-Noether-Strasse 9 /\ link http://nic.xlink.net/ > D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany /_______ email: > hostmaster(a)xlink.net > [ KPNQwest Germany GmbH, Sitz Karlsruhe > ] > [ Amtsgericht Karlsruhe HRB 8161, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael > Mueller-Berg ]

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters