toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

antivirus ?
by Frank Bonnet 19 Sep '02

19 Sep '02

Hi Does anyone knows some anti-virus scanning solutions that could run on a F85 filer ? or a third party software that could runs thru NFS mounted partitions ? Thx -- Frank Bonnet

1 0

NAC on "Using the Linux® NFS Client with Network Appliance?"
by Quentin Fennessy 18 Sep '02

18 Sep '02

I don't recall seeing this mentioned on the toasters list. Netapp has a new (12 Aug 2002) white paper on Linux NFS client tuning, done by Chuck Lever. http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3183.html I think you can get to this paper without NOW access. The paper is self-described as: This report provides advice for getting the best from your Linux NFS clients in an environment that includes Network Appliance filers. You'll learn what level of performance to expect from your Linux systems. You'll learn how to tune your Linux clients and diagnose performance and reliability problems. We'll recommend software levels and hardware combinations that are known to work well. Finally, you'll learn where to look for more information when faced with problems that are difficult to diagnose. Good stuff. two thumbs way up. This paper should perhaps be read while using an internal voice with a Scottish burr. -- Quentin Fennessy Quentin.Fennessy(a)amd.com Office: 512.602.3873 Cell: 512.694.7489

1 0

Re: NetApp Gripe.
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 18 Sep '02

18 Sep '02

NetApp operates no differently than other vendors -- hardware maintenance pricing ratchets up on aging systems as newer models begin to deliver in volume. However, third parties can usually provide hardware maintenance contracts for older systems that provide significant savings to the user in the range of 30-50%. As part of these contracts, spare parts and/or complete (unlicensed) "failover" filers/systems are often kept on-site; this paves the way for "mean-time-to-repair" and "availability" that are actually superior to what the manufacturers' field engineering organizations can deliver. Scott Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 email: scott(a)unioncomputer.com phone: 952 935 7282 | fax: 952 935 5056 > Subj:NetApp Gripe. > Date:9/17/2002 5:53:04 PM Central Standard Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:devnull@adc.idt.com">devnull(a)adc.idt.com</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:toasters@mathworks.com">toasters(a)mathworks.com</A> > Sent from the Internet > > Toasters, > > Not really amused about the hike in NetApp maintenance prices, which seem > to have doubled. > > Is this a disturbing trend ya'll are seeing with other vendors also ? > > Anyways, i just wanted to bitch about it. > > > /dev/null > > devnull(a)adc.idt.com

1 0

RE:
by Hill, Aaron 17 Sep '02

17 Sep '02

Hi Bruno, We ran Solaris 2.6 with ASE 12.0 for a while with the devices on our F820 and F880 but ran into some major performance issues. Mostly related to network throughput. Once we moved to 2.8 and SUN 2.0 Gigabit NICS, these problems disappeared. I am not a sybase expert, but I know we have a separate volume that we perform sybase dumps to. We ftp the dumps daily to a F820 at our Disaster Recovery site. This process works fine as long as we have bandwidth available on the WAN. We would have preferred to use Snapmirror, but that requires ASE 12.5 and a special quiesce procedure. You can find more on this at the NetApp NOW website, I think the article is a whitepaper on Sybase Disaster Recovery. If you have any more specific questions, let me know, I may be able have a chat to our Sybase Architect. Thanks, Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Bruno Boyer [mailto:bboyer@refer.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:53 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Has anyone got experience with doing Sybase (ASE 12.5, Solaris 2.6 and 2.8) dump on NetApp filers ? I am looking for recommendations on this subject: what is the best architecture ? What are the traps to be avoided? Perfomances ? Etc. Thank you for your help. Bruno. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/

1 0

NFS run amok
by Lance A. Brown 17 Sep '02

17 Sep '02

Greetings, I have an F720 with 6.1.1R2 running on it displaying an extremely weird situation. 'sysstat 2' reports: CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache in out read write read write age 16% 0 0 0 12300 1 0 0 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12301 1 0 0 0 0 >60 18% 0 0 0 12302 1 88 110 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12301 0 0 0 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12301 0 0 0 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12300 0 0 0 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12305 0 0 0 0 0 >60 18% 0 0 0 12300 0 82 104 0 0 >60 17% 0 0 0 12300 0 0 0 0 0 >60 17% 0 0 0 12299 0 0 0 0 0 >60 17% 2 0 0 12301 1 0 0 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12301 0 0 0 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12300 0 0 0 0 0 >60 18% 0 0 0 12300 1 88 110 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12301 0 0 0 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12301 0 0 0 0 0 >60 16% 0 0 0 12300 0 0 0 0 0 >60 17% 0 0 0 12301 0 0 0 0 0 >60 18% 0 0 0 12301 0 82 104 0 0 >60 Running pktt on the netapp reveals LOTS of UDP nfs traffic to the filer but no responses from the filer. The client is a Red Hat linux box. We are stumped on this at this point. Any advice? --[Lance] -- Lance A. Brown SysAdmin Task LMIT ITSS Contract for National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 919.361.5444x420

7 8

None
by Bruno Boyer 17 Sep '02

17 Sep '02

Has anyone got experience with doing Sybase (ASE 12.5, Solaris 2.6 and 2.8) dump on NetApp filers ? I am looking for recommendations on this subject: what is the best architecture ? What are the traps to be avoided? Perfomances ? Etc. Thank you for your help. Bruno. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/

1 0

None
by HEMANTH BK 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

anybody out there using following combination, Filer + win2k + oracle 8i please do let me know any issues. Thanks Hem __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com

1 0

Volume sizes
by Haber, David J. 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

I just added two DS14 shelves to an F840. I have 24 of the disks available for a new volume(s). Would it be better to create 2 volumes of 12, 72G drives or 1 volume of 24, 72G drives. The filer is used as a cache for storing radiology images. No backups are required and there are no snapshots required either. I have two hot spares available.

3 2

SUMMARY: how to get back the Tape drive after brocade switch went down
by ilya.birman＠abnamro.com 11 Sep '02

11 Sep '02

Thanks to two great responces I got from Drew O'Donnell and Adam Fox tghe problem was fixed: Drew O'Donnell: toaster>priv set advanced toaster>fcadmin reset_adapter "adapter#" Adam Fox: filer> storage enable adapter <adapter_name> Original question: We had an outage on the Brocade fiber switch that attaches STK tape drives to 3 filers 1 filer that is running 6.2.1 pick the drive after the fiber switch went live again The other 2 are running 6.1R1 and they do not see their drives any more Short of rebooting the Filers running 6.1R1, what can be done Here is a log from filer with 6.1R1 Wed Sep 11 11:28:23 CDT [filer1: ispfc_main:warning]: Loop break detected on Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:28:54 CDT [filer1: ispfc_timeout:error]: Could not recover loop on Fibre Channel adapter 5 after 30 seconds. Wed Sep 11 11:28:54 CDT [filer1: ispfc_timeout:error]: Offlining loop attached to Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:28:54 CDT [filer1: ispfc_init_3:notice]: Fibre Channel adapter 5 is now offline. Here is the log from Filer 6.2.1 Wed Sep 11 11:37:53 CDT [ispfc_main:warning]: Link break detected on Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:37:53 CDT [ispfc_timeout:warning]: Resetting Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:38:10 CDT [ispfc_timeout:warning]: Resetting Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:38:27 CDT [ispfc_timeout:error]: Offlining Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:38:27 CDT [ispfc_init_2:notice]: Fibre Channel adapter 5 is now offline. Wed Sep 11 11:40:14 CDT [ispfc_init_2:warning]: Fibre Channel switch attached to Fibre Channel adapter 5 advertises an R_A_TOV value of 10000 mSecs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: how to get back the Tape drive after brocade switch went down
by Drew O'Donnell 11 Sep '02

11 Sep '02

We had this same issue, and came up with the following issue which has worked on multiple occasions without disrupting the filers operation: toaster>priv set advanced toaster>fcadmin reset_adapter "adapter#" Let me know if it works Drew -----Original Message----- From: ilya.birman(a)abnamro.com [mailto:ilya.birman@abnamro.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:24 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: how to get back the Tape drive after brocade switch went down We had an outage on the Brocade fiber switch that attaches STK tape drives to 3 filers 1 filer that is running 6.2.1 pick the drive after the fiber switch went live again The other 2 are running 6.1R1 and they do not see their drives any more Short of rebooting the Filers running 6.1R1, what can be done Here is a log from filer with 6.1R1 Wed Sep 11 11:28:23 CDT [filer1: ispfc_main:warning]: Loop break detected on Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:28:54 CDT [filer1: ispfc_timeout:error]: Could not recover loop on Fibre Channel adapter 5 after 30 seconds. Wed Sep 11 11:28:54 CDT [filer1: ispfc_timeout:error]: Offlining loop attached to Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:28:54 CDT [filer1: ispfc_init_3:notice]: Fibre Channel adapter 5 is now offline. Here is the log from Filer 6.2.1 Wed Sep 11 11:37:53 CDT [ispfc_main:warning]: Link break detected on Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:37:53 CDT [ispfc_timeout:warning]: Resetting Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:38:10 CDT [ispfc_timeout:warning]: Resetting Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:38:27 CDT [ispfc_timeout:error]: Offlining Fibre Channel adapter 5. Wed Sep 11 11:38:27 CDT [ispfc_init_2:notice]: Fibre Channel adapter 5 is now offline. Wed Sep 11 11:40:14 CDT [ispfc_init_2:warning]: Fibre Channel switch attached to Fibre Channel adapter 5 advertises an R_A_TOV value of 10000 mSecs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (or its group companies) does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters