toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

18 Oct '05

If you are running a current enough ONTAP release, you can go into maintenace mode and do a "scsi format disk id" and see what happens. I highly doubt that will fix it as there is something else seriously wrong with the disk. Almost always, if ONTAP can't spin it up after a fresh wiping of the disks, then the disk is likely bad. --tmac Blake Golliher wrote: > Are they just showing up as failed right now? You can unfail them, > using disk unfail (that is a "priv set diag" mode command). That > should do it, but if not, you might have to remove them from the > failed disk registry. For that you should reboot, and hit ^c to dump > you into the 1-5 menu. Choose option 5 for maintenance mode, and from > there, run the command 'raid_config info deletefdr' and choose those > disks to fail. You'll see numbers corresponding to known failed > disks, this system has seen, just choose the disks you want back. > > I don't know of a way to 'low level format' a disk in ontap. There is > 'disk sanitize', but I'm not sure that's the same thing enough for > you. The above actions, at least, will bring the disks back to you. > > -Blake > > On 10/10/05, Carl Friend <Carl.Friend(a)mathworks.com> wrote: > >> Greetings Toaster fans, >> >> We powered down four F840s last week, reconfigured them with the >>newest drives we had (it's a long story), and upon reboot, at least >>three of the drives started experiencing random failures. These >>failures are enough that ONTAP gripes and marks them as "failed", >>but I suspect that a low-level format should bring things back to a >>sane state. >> >> Can ONTAP low-level format a 520B/sector disk, or do I need to >>find something else to do that? If the latter, does anyone have an >>idea as to what I can use? >> >> Many thanks! >> >>+----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+ >>| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | Natick, Massachusetts | >>| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | 01760-2098 | >>| mailto:carl_friend@mathworks.com +-----------------------+ >>| http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum | ICBM: 42:18N 71:21W | >>+----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+ >> > > >

1 0

RE: Monday morning Question - NTFS ACL resetting.
by Warkentin, Grant 17 Oct '05

17 Oct '05

Thanks - couldn't change ownership at all Security tab missing for folder in explorer - ntfschown, cacls, xcacls and doing an rm (as filer root with "priv set advanced" on) all wouldn't work. Did find a workaround - Created at new home folder for the user and copied all his files to it. After he disconnected, I was able to rename the original home folder. The rename did something as I was then able to delete the problem folder afterwards. Never seen this happen before. NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation. ________________________________ From: Holland, William L [mailto:hollandwl@state.gov] Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 11:35 AM To: Warkentin, Grant Subject: RE: Monday morning Question - NTFS ACL resetting. If you are an Administrator you should be able to change ownership to the Administrators group. After doing that you can change the security. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:Grant.Warkentin@calgary.ca] Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 1:26 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Monday morning Question - NTFS ACL resetting. I have a user that has been messing with his NT security in his home folder. He has managed to lock out administrators from access to a specific folder. Now he wants the folder restored - this is do-able from a snapshot but I have to put the contents in a different folder. Problem: I cannot delete the bad folder. I cannot take Ownership of the bad folder. I cannot even view the ACLs on the bad folder. You folks know of a way to remove this folder? We have the volume set to NTFS security. Must be a Monday - cannot seem to think of any methods to remove this folder. Thanks. Grant Warkentin System Administrator II City of Calgary - Information Technology Mail Drop == 8245 Ph: (403) 268-5629 Fax: (403) 268-2546 NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation.

1 0

Monday morning Question - NTFS ACL resetting.
by Warkentin, Grant 17 Oct '05

17 Oct '05

I have a user that has been messing with his NT security in his home folder. He has managed to lock out administrators from access to a specific folder. Now he wants the folder restored - this is do-able from a snapshot but I have to put the contents in a different folder. Problem: I cannot delete the bad folder. I cannot take Ownership of the bad folder. I cannot even view the ACLs on the bad folder. You folks know of a way to remove this folder? We have the volume set to NTFS security. Must be a Monday - cannot seem to think of any methods to remove this folder. Thanks. Grant Warkentin System Administrator II City of Calgary - Information Technology Mail Drop == 8245 Ph: (403) 268-5629 Fax: (403) 268-2546 NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation.

1 0

virus found in sent message "Report"
by System Anti-Virus Administrator 17 Oct '05

17 Oct '05

Attention: toasters(a)mathworks.com A virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The virus was reported to be: Worm.Mydoom.M Please update your virus scanner or contact your IT support personnel as soon as possible as you may have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: toasters(a)mathworks.com RCPT TO: comunidad(a)slcolombia.org ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: toasters(a)mathworks.com Received: from host160-102.pool81119.interbusiness.it (HELO mathworks.com) (81.119.102.160) by 172.31.1.93 with SMTP; 17 Oct 2005 07:34:13 -0000 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: comunidad(a)slcolombia.org Subject: Report Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:37:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_2D60E8E7.378B7B9B" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 ---

1 0

Airflow in DS14 shelf if disk removed
by Chris Thompson 13 Oct '05

13 Oct '05

We had a failure of a disk in our DS14 shelf (attached to an F810) last night. All the automatic shipping of a replacement seems to be working fine. However, if one leaves the failed disk in the shelf while waiting for the replacement, then every few hours one gets a message like Wed Oct 12 10:00:00 BST [raid.fdr.reminder:warning]: Failed Disk 8b.22 Shelf 1 Bay 6 [NETAPP X272_SCHT6073F10 NA06] S/N [3HZ171ZR000073420TXM] is still present in the system and should be removed. But I am concerned that actually removing the disk with its carrier would leave the airflow through the shelf unbalanced. I have compromised by disenganging the disk from the shelf but leaving it sitting in the slot, sticking out just a little. What do others do in in this situation? Maybe you all have dummy carriers to block vacant slots? -- Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

3 2

RE: Airflow in DS14 shelf if disk removed
by Coder, James (STP) 13 Oct '05

13 Oct '05

We had a disk in a ds14 cause a 960 cluster to fail due to noise on the buss. Air flow is not my main concern. Pull the puppy as soon as practical. jc James C. Coder " Plan the Work - Accept Only One Number 1 Priority at a Time." Sr. UNIX Administrator Guidant Corporation 4100 Hamline Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55112 Tel: 651-582-4797 Fax 651-582-4285 email: james.coder(a)guidant.com "Any views expressed in this e-mail are not those of Guidant Corporation." -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Funke (Home Office) Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 5:12 PM To: Chris Thompson Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Airflow in DS14 shelf if disk removed Am 12.10.2005 um 21:54 schrieb Chris Thompson: > We had a failure of a disk in our DS14 shelf (attached to an F810) > last night. All the automatic shipping of a replacement seems to be > working fine. > > However, if one leaves the failed disk in the shelf while waiting for > the replacement, then every few hours one gets a message like > > Wed Oct 12 10:00:00 BST [raid.fdr.reminder:warning]: > Failed Disk 8b.22 Shelf 1 Bay 6 > [NETAPP X272_SCHT6073F10 NA06] S/N [3HZ171ZR000073420TXM] > is still present in the system and should be removed. > > But I am concerned that actually removing the disk with its carrier > would leave the airflow through the shelf unbalanced. I have > compromised by disenganging the disk from the shelf but leaving it > sitting in the slot, sticking out just a little. > > What do others do in in this situation? Maybe you all have dummy > carriers to block vacant slots? I think it's a common solution to release the disk and stick it out just a little so the rack door can still be closed. ;-)

1 0

RE: Airflow in DS14 shelf if disk removed
by Francett, Robert D (SAIC) 12 Oct '05

12 Oct '05

I do the same thing you are doing. Bob -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Chris Thompson Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 11:55 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Airflow in DS14 shelf if disk removed We had a failure of a disk in our DS14 shelf (attached to an F810) last night. All the automatic shipping of a replacement seems to be working fine. However, if one leaves the failed disk in the shelf while waiting for the replacement, then every few hours one gets a message like Wed Oct 12 10:00:00 BST [raid.fdr.reminder:warning]: Failed Disk 8b.22 Shelf 1 Bay 6 [NETAPP X272_SCHT6073F10 NA06] S/N [3HZ171ZR000073420TXM] is still present in the system and should be removed. But I am concerned that actually removing the disk with its carrier would leave the airflow through the shelf unbalanced. I have compromised by disenganging the disk from the shelf but leaving it sitting in the slot, sticking out just a little. What do others do in in this situation? Maybe you all have dummy carriers to block vacant slots? -- Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

1 0

VIRUS (Win32/MyDoom.O!Worm): IN UNA E-MAIL DA LEI INVIATA
by Content-filter at bolino.trampi.mpi.it 11 Oct '05

11 Oct '05

VIRUS ALERT Il sistema di scansione ha rilevato un problema in una email presumibilmente inviate da Lei -> (<toasters(a)mathworks.com>), per il seguente destinatario: -> namm53200t(a)istruzione.it La consegna del messaggio non e' potuta avvenire Di seguito i riferimenti della e-Mail inviata: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from mathworks.com (host94-103.pool81119.interbusiness.it [81.119.103.94]) by mx4.istruzione.it (Mail Service) with ESMTP id 683DC562B68 for <namm53200t(a)istruzione.it>; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:44:51 +0200 (CEST) From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: namm53200t(a)istruzione.it Subject: blozdafajn Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:32:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_A731886D.9EBD5091" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20051011104451.683DC562B68(a)mx4.istruzione.it> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------

1 0

Natural medicine for the New Millennium.
by Arnold Berry 11 Oct '05

11 Oct '05

eBay Pharmacy that will be accessing this feed.You are not allowed to access this page from this IP address. We don't care. We don't have to. We're the phone company. Creativity is a drug I cannot live without. Adolescence is the stage between infancy and adultery. The ancestor of every action is a thought. A friend is a gift you give yourself. Pride is seldom delicate; it will please itself with very mean advantages. A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step.

1 0

Formatting disks
by Carl Friend 10 Oct '05

10 Oct '05

Greetings Toaster fans, We powered down four F840s last week, reconfigured them with the newest drives we had (it's a long story), and upon reboot, at least three of the drives started experiencing random failures. These failures are enough that ONTAP gripes and marks them as "failed", but I suspect that a low-level format should bring things back to a sane state. Can ONTAP low-level format a 520B/sector disk, or do I need to find something else to do that? If the latter, does anyone have an idea as to what I can use? Many thanks! +----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+ | Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | Natick, Massachusetts | | Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | 01760-2098 | | mailto:carl_friend@mathworks.com +-----------------------+ | http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum | ICBM: 42:18N 71:21W | +----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters