toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

3 participants
13514 discussions

failure notice
by MAILER-DAEMON＠mx.arib.or.jp 03 Mar '06

03 Mar '06

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mx.arib.or.jp. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <yamakura(a)arib.or.jp>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: (qmail 11010 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2006 06:31:00 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO ml.arib.or.jp) (211.132.3.5) by mx.arib.or.jp with SMTP; 4 Mar 2006 06:31:00 +0900 Received: (qmail 22776 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2006 06:30:04 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO mathworks.com) (216.75.71.34) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2006 06:30:04 +0900 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: yamakura(a)arib.or.jp Subject: Message could not be delivered Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:25:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_DE8CB6E1.DC073F1A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_DE8CB6E1.DC073F1A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear user yamakura(a)arib.or.jp, We have found that your account was used to send a large amount of unsolicited e-mail during this week. Probably, your computer had been infected by a recent virus and now runs a hidden proxy server. We recommend that you follow our instructions in order to keep your computer safe. Sincerely yours, The arib.or.jp team. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_DE8CB6E1.DC073F1A Content-Type: Text/HTML; name="warning.htm"; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: attachment; Filename="warning.htm" Content-Description: =?utf-8?B?5aW944G+44GX44GP44Gq44GE44Kz44Oz44OG44Oz44OE44Gu572u5o+b?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 PEhUTUw+DQo8TUVUQSBIVFRQLUVRVUlWPSJDb250ZW50LVR5cGUiIENPTlRFTlQ9InRleHQvaHRt bDsgY2hhcnNldD11dGYtOCI+DQo8Qk9EWT4NCg0KICA8aDE+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiNGRjAwMDAi PuOCpuOCpOODq+OCueaknOefpTwvZm9udD48L2gxPiA8cD7jgZPjga7jg5XjgqHjgqTjg6vjgavj gojjgaPjgabjgIHjgqbjgqTjg6vjgrkg44K544Kt44Oj44Oz44GM6ZaL5aeL44GX44G+44GX44Gf 44CCICDjgqbjgqTjg6vjgrnjga/pp4bpmaTjgZXjgozjgZrjgIHjgZPjga7jg5XjgqHjgqTjg6vj ga/liYrpmaTjgZXjgozjgb7jgZfjgZ/jgIIgPC9wPiA8cD7jgrPjg7Pjg4bjgq3jgrnjg4g6ICdh dHRhY2htZW50LnppcCc8YnI+5qSc5Ye6OiAnVzMyL015ZG9vbS5vQE1NIXppcCAoJiMxMjQ1NDsm IzEyNDUyOyYjMTI1MjM7JiMxMjQ3MzspJzwvcD4gIA0KPHA+6Kmz57Sw44Gr44Gk44GE44Gm44Gv 44CB44K344K544OG44Og566h55CG6ICF44Gr56K66KqN44GX44Gm44GP44Gg44GV44GE44CCPC9w PjxwPkNvcHlyaWdodCAmY29weTsgMTk5My0yMDA0IE5ldHdvcmtzIEFzc29jaWF0ZXMgVGVjaG5v bG9neSwgSW5jLjxicj5BbGwgUmlnaHRzIFJlc2VydmVkLjxicj4gPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL3d3 dy5tY2FmZWVzZWN1cml0eS5jb20iPmh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWNhZmVlc2VjdXJpdHkuY29tPC9hPjwv cD4NCjwvQk9EWT4NCjwvSFRNTD4NCgo= ------=_NextPart_000_0000_DE8CB6E1.DC073F1A--

1 0

thank me later
by Tirion 03 Mar '06

03 Mar '06

Hi jgalenski, Check this out, Junior told me on Sunday that ur partner been unsatisfied about u in the bedroom. I can assist with that. Check out www.zlwpv.org/j3/. I've been using them for a years now and nothing but good things for them. He feels that he can deal with his situation by waiting until the next school year in order to apply . alth problems. Many people were dying from the over smoking of the opium. The imperial commissioner, Lin Zexu, finally found out of the illeg. See ya Tirion

1 0

RE: Daylight saving changes from April to March on 2007!
by Ehrhart, Rick 03 Mar '06

03 Mar '06

Just to follow up on this topic. The burt or bug number is 195805. http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=195805 You can check the burt via NOW for the ONTAP releases where the fix is included. There is also a NOW Knowledge Base article 13716, http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=kb13716 which has a procedure on how to load timezone files onto a filer. - Rick - > -----Original Message----- > From: Ehrhart, Rick > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:16 AM > To: George, Andrew; Cao, Vinh V (Vinh); toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: RE: Daylight saving changes from April to March on 2007! > > > Network Appliance is working on providing new timezone files > without running zic and a procedure to load the new timezone > files. > > - Rick - > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: George, Andrew [mailto:georgea@anz.com] > > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:45 PM > > To: Cao, Vinh V (Vinh); toasters(a)mathworks.com > > Subject: RE: Daylight saving changes from April to March on 2007! > > > > > > I asked about Australia as we've got a change due to the > commonwealth > > games > > Netapps response was to point me to the Brazil time KB > > article and tell > > me roll my own zonefiles > > Being a 99% windows only shop I was less than impressed > with trying to > > locate a Unix box with zic on top of it so I could compile > > the binaries > > (wound up using a linux box) considering just about every other > > enterprise vendor I've seen was happy to supply updated zone files. > > > > I didn't succumb to temptation and name the new timezone > time code to > > "Netapp Sucks" (though it was awfully tempting to send a > > couple of weeks > > autosupport logs in with that just to get the message across > > > > Andrew > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > > On Behalf Of Cao, Vinh V (Vinh) > > Sent: Friday, 17 February 2006 6:06 AM > > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > > Subject: Daylight saving changes from April to March on 2007! > > > > Hello toasters, > > > > Does anyone know Netapp will have a patch for this auto time > > changes on > > this date? > > > > Read Change to Daylight Saving Time > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Policy_Act_of_2005#Change_ > to_Dayligh > t_Saving_Time > > Just curiosity, > > Vinh >

1 0

Using VBScript to perform ndmpcopy
by Holland, William L 03 Mar '06

03 Mar '06

I am attempting to write a VBScript to automate a routine ndmpcopy operation. I'm able to initiate the copy just fine, but I am not able to monitor it for completion. Below is the section that performs the copy and attempts to monitor for completion that performs an ndmpcopy from one qtree to another on the same filer: sCmd = "cmd /c rsh " & sSrcFiler & " ndmpcopy " & aSrcPath & " " & aDestPath Set oExec = oShell.Exec(sCmd) Do While oExec.Status = 0 sStatusTxt = Now & " - ndmpcopy not complete. Will check again in 5 minutes." WScript.Echo(sStatusTxt) oLogFile.WriteLine sStatusTxt WScript.Sleep 300000 Loop sScreenOutput = oExec.StdOut.ReadAll WScript.Echo(sScreenOutput) If InStr(sScreenOutput,"Transfer successful") > 0 Then QuitGood Else QuitBad End If This particular snippet will never get out of the Do...Loop. However, if I add the -n switch to the rsh command, after approximately 15 minutes it will complete. However, the ndmpcopy operation will abort and not complete in this scenario. Anyone have any ideas of a way to do this?

1 0

rquotad at 7.1 ?
by Frank Bonnet 03 Mar '06

03 Mar '06

Hello I have a boring trouble with my Linux NFS clients before using 7.1 ( 6.5.x) the Linux "quota" command report the user's quota , since I use a FAS270 at 7.1 the quota command reports nothing ... Any infos about this ? Thanks -- Frank Bonnet - Memory fault - where am I? -

1 0

Good Day,
by dr_johnzumafnb 03 Mar '06

03 Mar '06

1 0

RE: R100 with 256 meg cf card
by Glenn Walker 02 Mar '06

02 Mar '06

When you run download, the command kicks off another process that repartitions the card for you. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Brian Parent Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 11:44 AM To: George, Andrew Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: R100 with 256 meg cf card You may have already solved this issue, but I was recently poking around at the same problem for us. I was able to put the 32MB CF card on a Solaris box, use the 'dd' utility to make a bit for bit copy of the CF card onto a file. Then I put the 256MB CF card on the Solaris box, and used 'dd' to copy the file onto the 256MB CF card. I then installed the 256MB card on my R100 running DOT 6.4.5, and was able to run the download command successfully. The problem, I think, is that the newer releases (> 6.4) expect a different partition layout, and that 6.4 wants to see four partitions. Obviously there are other ways to create the partitions, but dd was simplest for me, copying the data as well as the partitions tables. I'm hoping that when I upgrade to 6.5 or 7.x, the upgrade process will repartition the CF card as necessary. I've got a call into NetApp about this, but have been waiting (since Feb 1, 2006) for an answer. Re: > Subject: R100 with 256 meg cf card > Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:39:10 +1000 > From: "George, Andrew" <georgea(a)anz.com> > To: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > > I've tried to upgrade two r100's from 32 meg CF cards to 256 meg CF > cards (so we can have a backup boot image with OnTap 6.5) > On both occasions it's pretty much choked as soon as it's tried to see > the 256 meg card and we've had to do some messing around to get a single > image onto the card > > I'm beginning to think that an R100 running 6.4.x just can't see a > 256meg cf card correctly and was wondering if anyone else has had a > problem doing this? > > Andrew

3 4

RE: R100 with 256 meg cf card
by Durnbaugh, Dave 02 Mar '06

02 Mar '06

If you have support: http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=98952 -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Brian Parent Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 11:18 AM To: Will Strickland Cc: Glenn Walker; George, Andrew; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: R100 with 256 meg cf card The firmware level on my R100 is 4.3_i1. My best guess is that DOT 6.5 and newer has a download command which repartitions the CF card appropriately. Since this R100 is our production filer, I'd appreciate a more definitive answer before upgrading from 6.4.5. There are various files in /etc/boot/x86/ which end in ".cmds", which include comments that make it pretty obvious that someone, somewhere in NetApp knew, at one point in time, about the partition issues, and the transition from a four partition layout to a single partition layout. Does the front line tech support lack adequate access to the knowledgeable engineers? Or has that knowledge left the company contained in the brains of some engineers? Re: > From: "Will Strickland" <willstrickland(a)nc.rr.com> > To: "Brian Parent" <bparent(a)calvin.ucsd.edu>, > "Glenn Walker" <ggwalker(a)mindspring.com> > Cc: "George, Andrew" <georgea(a)anz.com>, <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > Subject: Re: R100 with 256 meg cf card > Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 21:19:18 -0500 > > 256MB CF requires at least min rev of OFW 4.2.1. What version of > motherboard firmware do you have on the R100? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian Parent" <bparent(a)calvin.ucsd.edu> > To: "Glenn Walker" <ggwalker(a)mindspring.com> > Cc: "George, Andrew" <georgea(a)anz.com>; <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 7:41 PM > Subject: Re: R100 with 256 meg cf card > > > >Can you say for which versions of Data OnTap this is true? > >It doesn't appear to be true for 6.4.5. If I install a 256MB > >CF card with just one partition, and then run download, > >it fails with an error that makes it sound like the CF card > >wasn't even inserted. > > > >Re: > >>Subject: RE: R100 with 256 meg cf card > >>Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:58:18 -0500 > >>From: "Glenn Walker" <ggwalker(a)mindspring.com> > >>To: "Brian Parent" <bparent(a)calvin.ucsd.edu>, > >>"George, Andrew" <georgea(a)anz.com> > >>Cc: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > >> > >>When you run download, the command kicks off another process that > >>repartitions the card for you. > >> > >>Glenn > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > >>On Behalf Of Brian Parent > >>Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 11:44 AM > >>To: George, Andrew > >>Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > >>Subject: Re: R100 with 256 meg cf card > >> > >>You may have already solved this issue, but I was recently poking > >>around at the same problem for us. I was able to put the 32MB CF > >>card on a Solaris box, use the 'dd' utility to make a bit for bit > >>copy of the CF card onto a file. Then I put the 256MB CF card on > >>the Solaris box, and used 'dd' to copy the file onto the 256MB > >>CF card. I then installed the 256MB card on my R100 running > >>DOT 6.4.5, and was able to run the download command successfully. > >> > >>The problem, I think, is that the newer releases (> 6.4) expect a > >>different > >>partition layout, and that 6.4 wants to see four partitions. > >>Obviously there are other ways to create the partitions, but > >>dd was simplest for me, copying the data as well as the partitions > >>tables. > >> > >>I'm hoping that when I upgrade to 6.5 or 7.x, the upgrade process > >>will repartition the CF card as necessary. I've got a call into > >>NetApp about this, but have been waiting (since Feb 1, 2006) for > >>an answer. > >> > >>Re: > >>> Subject: R100 with 256 meg cf card > >>> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:39:10 +1000 > >>> From: "George, Andrew" <georgea(a)anz.com> > >>> To: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > >>> > >>> I've tried to upgrade two r100's from 32 meg CF cards to 256 meg CF > >>> cards (so we can have a backup boot image with OnTap 6.5) > >>> On both occasions it's pretty much choked as soon as it's tried to see > >>> the 256 meg card and we've had to do some messing around to get a > >>single > >>> image onto the card > >>> > >>> I'm beginning to think that an R100 running 6.4.x just can't see a > >>> 256meg cf card correctly and was wondering if anyone else has had a > >>> problem doing this? > >>> > >>> Andrew > > > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.1/271 - Release Date: 2/28/2006 > > > > This message, including any attachments, contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies. You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.

1 0

74% of members got laid
by Cornelia Bell 02 Mar '06

02 Mar '06

We offer you a service that helps people get laid! Many girls and guys are all around you, looking to have some fun! No cheezy pickup lines... no gifts... no walks on the beach... people here only want to have sex ;) And just to let you know, a little over 65% of our members have already hooked up! http://www.hookup-with-hotties.net/

1 0

今女の子の秘密
by trehhy 02 Mar '06

02 Mar '06

今どきのギャルの秘密公開誰にも内緒ね！ http://comecomenight.com/oh/ 問） chikichiki_2006(a)yahoo.fr

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters