toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

Start a nNew thread

subscribe : toasters
by Ron Neuenberger 21 Sep '98

21 Sep '98

1 0

(no subject)
by ian.gardner＠vf.vodafone.co.uk 21 Sep '98

21 Sep '98

unsubscribe toasters

1 0

None
by DESCHAMPS, Stephane 21 Sep '98

21 Sep '98

> unsubscribe >

1 0

(no subject)
by ian.gardner＠vf.vodafone.co.uk 21 Sep '98

21 Sep '98

unsubscribe

1 0

Re: Does your e0 on the F330 work? HELP (Solved)
by Daniel Wong 18 Sep '98

18 Sep '98

The Catalyst 5000 port that the laptop had verified is indeed the culprit. I am now up at 100tx-fd. Why it verified I don't know. I don't know why swaping the e0/f7 didn't work either. TGIF Guess now if have to figure out why it says the fan has stopped, else find the fan that has stopped. Thanks all, Dan -- Daniel E Wong GIS System/Network Administrator City of Spokane mailto:dewong@sprintmail.com 808 W Spokane Falls Blvd mailto:dwong@spokanecity.org Spokane WA 99201-3344 (o) 509/625-6499 (fax) 509/625-6550

1 0

RE: A netapp failover possibility...???
by Steve Strange 18 Sep '98

18 Sep '98

On Friday, September 18, 1998 2:11 PM, Guy Harris [SMTP:guy@netapp.com] wrote: > > I don't know if hot spares can be left > > unassigned, so it may be necessary for each filer to have its own hot > > spare(s) assigned to it. > > Hot spares are, as I remember, owned by particular members of the CF > pair. Right -- ownership is based on how the disk shelf is wired up to the filers. So all the disks in any given shelf are "owned" by the same filer, regardless of whether they are part of a filesystem or a hot spare. Steve

2 1

[Fwd: Quad Fast Ethernet vs. Single Fast Ethernets]
by Zack Rivette 18 Sep '98

18 Sep '98

Please remove me from this list...

1 0

Re: Bad HD
by Daniel Quinlan 18 Sep '98

18 Sep '98

hitz(a)netapp.com (Dave Hitz) writes: > Our motivation was really your second guess: > > To make sure the admin knows something is wrong. > > We couldn't come up with any way to absolutely, reliably *guarantee* > that the sysadmin would get notified except to have the box turn itself > off. We even joked about putting lights and sirens on the box, but the > problem is, at smaller sites, people sometimes stick these things in a > closet somewhere and forget about them. What does the system do when the raid.timeout is reached? Does the LCD display anything, is there an SNMP trap, autosupport email, autosupport note, etc. ? Also, does it completely power off? I'm wondering if we should disable the feature or possibly extend the timeout. Thanks. - Dan

3 2

Re: F740 and Exchange
by Bridget Allison 18 Sep '98

18 Sep '98

Jason wrote: >Is there anything special that has to be done for a 740 filer and >Microsoft Exchange to work together? *I'm presuming that you have CIFS configured on the filer and the filer is in an NT Domain. * The short answer is no. There's nothing you need to do to the filer. However, if you are wanting to use the filer to store the Information store and directory and transaction logs then you will need to make changes on your Exchange server. Exchange does not allow you to install on a network drive - so you can't specify a mapped drive for the location of your data. You can of course store your pst files on a filer - many people do this today and it works just fine since those files are not part of the central message store. So you would need to install Exchange on local disk and then copy the files over to the filer, update the Exchange keys in the registry to point to the new location and then restart Exchange. NetApp has done quite a bit of testing using filers to house the Exchange Information Stores and we've had excellent results. I am in the process of publishing the config details on that to the NOW web site so that customers can do their own testing. Be aware, however, that this is *completely unsupported* right now - by both NetApp and Microsoft. If you want to see how a filer can help your Exchange environment (performance, snapshots etc) and are willing to explore this unsupported for the moment then we'd be very interested in your results. I'll send a message to the list once the info is up on the NOW site (should be mid-next week). If you have an urgent desire for the config details before then please email me directly at bridget(a)netapp.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bridget Allison Marketing Manager, NetApp Windows Networking Network Appliance Inc.

1 0

Does your e0 on the F330 work? HELP
by Daniel Wong 18 Sep '98

18 Sep '98

To all you wonderful workers of magic: I've been using FDDI on f7 just fine, but management decided to go Fastethernet (dropping FDDI) and I can't get e0 to link with our Cisco Catalyst 5000 at either 10 or 100, half or full. Laptop links OK, e0 can't ping anything on the new subnet except itself. Brought down f7 and ifconfiged e0 with f7's IP and same problem. Thus, dgateway and route hasn't changed => must be e0, right? Does anybody know what I'm not doing? I've already tried my spare motherboard and have an RMA for another board here by my side. Config: F330, 256MB, 8MB NVRAM, NetApp Release 4.2a Dual Attached FDDI, no ethernet card. Thanks in advance, Dan -- Daniel E Wong GIS System/Network Administrator City of Spokane mailto:dewong@sprintmail.com 808 W Spokane Falls Blvd mailto:dwong@spokanecity.org Spokane WA 99201-3344 (o) 509/625-6499 (fax) 509/625-6550

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters