toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13523 discussions

NetApp CEO
by John Tatar 13 Dec '99

13 Dec '99

Yesterday, I was at my health club working out and watching CNBC. Here is the CEO of Netapp talking about their last quarter and their product line. What struck me was his statement about the product (This is not an exact quote - but a good approximation. Interviewer: So you don't have do things like upgrade the OS NetApp CEO: No, our products are like a refrigerator, how often do you have to upgrade your refrigerator. Could someone at NetApp sign up the CEO for NetApp 101: Data ONTAP System Administration - Multiprotocol. ;-) JT -- =================================================================== John J. Tatar Systems & Network Engineering Section Advanced Computer Applications Group Decision & Information Sciences Division Argonne National Laboratory mailto:tatar@dis.anl.gov or john(a)tatar.com Office: 630-252-3242 Fax: 630-252-5128 Pager: 630-266-1063 ===================================================================

17 24

RE: Budtool / backup sw Mailing-List??
by Melvin, Grant 10 Dec '99

10 Dec '99

Hi, I don't know if this fits the bill, but I've been trying (off & on) to get agreement to start a ndmp-users(a)ndmp.org mailing list. Non-ndmp issues should also be welcomed so that all backup/restores issues are discussed. An ndmp-tech(a)ndmp.org already exists for developers that wish to discuss the spec itself. Would this be the right discussion group to setup? FYI, the NDMP.org website and e-mail lists are hosted at NetApp. Cheers, Grant -----Original Message----- From: dnb(a)ccs.neu.edu [mailto:dnb@ccs.neu.edu] Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 9:23 AM To: mc(a)com21.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Budtool / backup sw Mailing-List?? Michael Coxe <mc(a)com21.com> writes: > Is there a mailing-list for this sort of discussion? > I'm looking for one, either Budtool specific or UNIX/NT > generic (@ enterprise level). > > If not, do others feel a need for one? We'd be very interested in one as well (and would be willing to host if it didn't exist already). Anyone else? Peace, dNb

2 1

RE: Backup solutions
by Kelly Wyatt 10 Dec '99

10 Dec '99

We use NetBackup (currently 3.1.1, migrating to 3.2 early next year). We have been very pleased with the performance. Currently we backup through tape drives directly attached to the filers. However, we are in the process of setting up a backup lab where we can compare the feasibility of backing up over a dedicated trunk or GB network. Even if there is some sacrifice in performance the ability to use all drives in the tape library for all filers intrigues us... If I remember correctly, NBU 3.2 can do three way backups... We also use NBU for NT and UNIX backups... and will be testing AFS early next year. An enterprise wide solution was an important criteria for us... The SAS Institute/Veritas backup was announced in: http://www.veritas.com/company/pressroom/1999/pr991025%2D0.html Also, I presented our backup solution at VERICON99 (Veritas' User Group Meeting)... I'm sure a Veritas sales rep would be willing to send you a copy of the VERICON 99 CD which should have the presentation. Kelly -- Kelly Wyatt, Kelly.Wyatt(a)SAS.com Systems Programmer Integrated Solutions Consulting SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Drive / Cary, NC 27513 http://www.sas.com -----Original Message----- From: Paul Taylor [mailto:ptaylor@connectria.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 12:35 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: dhug(a)connectria.com Subject: Backup solutions Hi. We have two netapps, an f630 and an f760. We are currently using Budtool to back up everything, but we are less than pleased with performance, and the fact that the product is getting EOL'd by Leggato. What is everyone's opinion on what they use for backups? We are considering Workstation Solutions, and Legatto, among others. Thanks, Paul Taylor Sr. Systems Engineer Connectria 215-841-5540

1 0

RE: NAS-SAN
by Alvarado, Michael 10 Dec '99

10 Dec '99

Maybe I am giving too much of the benefit of the doubt but my interpretation of Carlos'' posting was that he wanted to make visible what Zerowait has already taken the initiative to create. Which, I might add, is a good start and I am sure it will be improved with more contributions. -----Original Message----- From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick@iol.ie] Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 2:54 AM To: mora(a)spectrix-hq.spectrix.com Cc: july(a)zerowait.com; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: NAS-SAN > You may want to start with http://www.nas-san.com/. It pays to read people's .sigs: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > July A. J. Linett, VP Tech Mktg > > 302.266.9408 july(a)zerowait.com > > > > Zerowait: Best Of Breed Internet Core Technologies > > Web Acceleration ** Data Storage ** Load Balancing > > www.zerowait.com*www.loadbalancing.net*www.nas-san.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- Nick

1 0

NAS-SAN
by July at Zerowait 10 Dec '99

10 Dec '99

As many of you know, the debate between NAS and/or SAN rages on. I've been asked to create a website for the purpose of elucidating the theory and practice of each so administrators, such as yourselves, can make better guesses as to which one (or maybe a combo) would work best for them. Plus we'll hopefully be able to provide a searchable database of issues and answers from practical experience. Not in competition to this list, of course, but an additional resource. Does anyone have any tales to tell on this topic? Problems, solutions, etc. Or know of a good source for articles on it? We'll gladly give by-lines to authors that want them. All ideas are welcome. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.-- ---------------------------------------------------------------- July A. J. Linett, VP Tech Mktg 302.266.9408 july(a)zerowait.com Zerowait: Best Of Breed Internet Core Technologies Web Acceleration ** Data Storage ** Load Balancing www.zerowait.com*www.loadbalancing.net*www.nas-san.com -------------------------------------------------------------------

3 2

Budtool / backup sw Mailing-List??
by Michael Coxe 10 Dec '99

10 Dec '99

With all the discussion of backups, ndmp, etc... Is there a mailing-list for this sort of discussion? I'm looking for one, either Budtool specific or UNIX/NT generic (@ enterprise level). If not, do others feel a need for one? - michael

1 0

Maxfiles and available space
by scw＠seas.ucla.edu 09 Dec '99

09 Dec '99

We're in the process of ordering another filer, this time with 36Gig disks. One think that we'd like to do is cut down on the filesystem overhead. Just out of curiousity, if we make maxfiles really small (say 50 per meg ) can we we get more available file space? Our current average filesize is ranges from 22k to 89k depending on the actual filesystem. How much space do netapps 'inodes' take? ----- Stephen C. Woods; UCLA SEASnet; 2567 Boelter hall; LA CA 90095; (310)-825-8614 Finger for public key scw(a)cirrus.seas.ucla.edu,Internet mail:scw@SEAS.UCLA.EDU

3 2

NOW cookies?
by Jim Davis 09 Dec '99

09 Dec '99

I asked netscape to show me the cookies and when I login to now.netapp.com I see vanWebSupUsr= my 'Username' vanWebSupPwd= my 'Password' cookies, apparently in cleartext. The only other quick example I could check (hotmail.com) appears not to use cleartext for the username/password. Dunno if it's a big deal, but it does seem... odd.

1 0

HP Exemplar S-Class Supercomputer F/S
by Crve＠aol.com 09 Dec '99

09 Dec '99

Hi All Exemplar S-Class Server will be available as of 12-7-99, those that are interested here are some information links to Hp Complete detail info will be e-mail by request only! Please only serious inquiries only! http://www.hp.com/pressrel/jun98/24jun98.htm http://www.hp.com/pressrel/sep96/30sep96a.htm Also one Hp Optical Library (jukebox) available model C1107H (6) 2.6 gig drive 238 slots with Media (92279F) same as the Hp 660 except with 2.6 drives Craig crve(a)aol.com

4 3

WTB: FW 4.3GB disks for Netapp
by Dane Jasper 08 Dec '99

08 Dec '99

I'm seeking some disks for our older filer. The drives I need are for the F210. They are FW SCSI-2 drives, Netapp model number was X217 4.3GB drive. I'd like to purchase between three and 10 of these drives. If you've got them sitting around and would like to liquidate, please let me know! -- Dane Jasper Sonic.net, Inc. (707)522-1000 mailto:dane@sonic.net http://www.sonic.net/ Key fingerprint = A5 D6 6E 16 D8 81 BA E9 CB BD A9 77 B3 AF 45 53

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters