toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE ME TO NETAPP NEWSGROUP
by Pape_Johannes＠emc.com 12 Jan '00

12 Jan '00

****************************** Johannes J. Pape Technical Account Manager (TAM) EMC Computer-Systems Deutschland GmbH Hammfelddamm 6 D-41460 Neuss, Germany Tel + 49 (0)2131-9191-189 Fax + 49 (0)2131-9191-193 Email pape_johannes(a)emc.com URL-GER www.emc2.de URL-US www.emc.com ******************************

1 0

deleting busy snapshots?
by mgx＠spruce.lsd.ornl.gov 12 Jan '00

12 Jan '00

good day all ... i've got a snapshot i cannot delete because its 'busy': poplar> snap list Volume vol0 working..................................................... %/used %/total date name ---------- ---------- ------------ -------- 1% ( 1%) 1% ( 1%) Jan 11 12:01 hourly.0 1% ( 1%) 1% ( 1%) Jan 11 08:01 hourly.1 1% ( 1%) 1% ( 1%) Jan 11 00:01 nightly.0 1% ( 1%) 1% ( 1%) Jan 10 20:01 hourly.2 2% ( 1%) 1% ( 1%) Jan 10 16:01 hourly.3 2% ( 1%) 1% ( 1%) Jan 10 12:01 hourly.4 2% ( 1%) 1% ( 1%) Jan 10 08:02 hourly.5 4% ( 2%) 3% ( 2%) Jan 10 00:02 nightly.1 19% (16%) 15% (13%) Dec 24 21:42 snapshot_for_backup.68 (busy) when i try do delete the snapshot i get: poplar> snap delete snapshot_for_backup.68 Snapshot in use by dump or a CIFS share. even though cifs and ndmpd are not running. how do i delete this snapshot while keeping the filer online? this is an F520/OT5.3.4R2 system. thanks! -- -- michael

3 3

Re: Budtool / backup sw Mailing-List??
by dnb＠ccs.neu.edu 12 Jan '00

12 Jan '00

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Jay Orr <orrjl(a)stl.nexen.com> writes: > Any progress on this? Just surfaced from our usual beginning-of-quarter madness, sorry for the delay. As far as I can tell (from www.liszt.com), there does not exist a list like this, so I've just created a new majordomo mailing list in response to these requests. It seems like folks are interested in both NetApp and Enterprise backup issues so I've tried to name the list accordingly (and in the spirit of BIG-LAN). Details follow: To subscribe: bigbackup-request(a)ccs.neu.edu To send to the list: bigbackup(a)ccs.neu.edu I'm hoping this will be a good place to discuss technical issues around the backup of large amounts of data from a {Netapp, Auspex, EMC...} box via {Budtool, Legato, QuickRestore...} etc. Other enterprise-wide backup issues are also welcome. I've set this list to be non-moderated, but closed to postings from non-members. Should the signal-to-noise ratio get too high, I'll flip it to moderated and take it from there. I've also disabled the "who" command so the addresses of the members will not be reaped enmasse by VARs (though I am not hiding the addresses of individual posters). In general, I'd appreciate it if marketing folks could also play nice. Hope this is useful, please feel free to send any comments or questions about this list directly to me. Respectfully, David N. Blank-Edelman Director of Technology College of Computer Science Northeastern University -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBOHvNvjVY18Ov2TldAQHeXwQAqUBMCr416ukVkKa4/sQC8RK1uU/7I0eR Jc/uOAwnLVsCqSR+kh8Wz5OMgHKy56MiL3xkRq99VSQfOTUshBCOlPG+4ygQff4U M+kcaYlJ4AFUDJV21IvmCg9z1eSype8qR5NlA0strCzUfV5JMrR5tM4xGc54O7r1 WkCoW2aEJT4= =5o78 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: Budtool and NetWorker
by dnb＠ccs.neu.edu 12 Jan '00

12 Jan '00

Jay Orr <orrjl(a)stl.nexen.com> writes: > Has anyone that uses Budtool to backup gotten any details about the option > to upgrade to NetWorker? I spoke to our local Legato rep about this right before Y2k and he was a wealth of "don't know yet" answers. He was sure they would have an "upgrade" program for exisiting customers, but not for a while. Apparently they are going to avoid an EOL for Budtool until the end of '00 and still sell it as a separate product until then. In the meantime, they are supposedly integrating Budtool into their standard Legato framework. He made it sound like Budtool would be a module as part of their usual stuff. It sounds like the folks in the field haven't heard yet because they haven't figured it out at the Legato homebase either. He suggested I contact his inside sales person, but I have not done that. Summary: nice soothing noises, but no real information Respectfully, David N. Blank-Edelman Director of Technology College of Computer Science Northeastern University

1 0

Anyone need sun atl libraries
by Crve＠aol.com 11 Jan '00

11 Jan '00

I got SUN ATL libraries 2 100 tape libraries with 2 DTL 7000 (Quantum model 7100) 2 52 tape libraries with 4 DLT 7000 (Quantum model 520) 4 52 tape libraries with 4 DLT 4000 (Quantum model 520) These units were used for evaluation by sun was never in service! In perfect condition contact Craig

3 2

RE: checksum_blocks vol option?
by Mohler,Anissa 11 Jan '00

11 Jan '00

The following is an excerpt from the 5.3.4R2 Start Here Guide - page 29. You can download the PDF file from the NOW site in the software download section. ========== start excerpt ============ Starting with 5.3.2, Data ONTAP checks the consistency of parity when performing disk scrubbing. If it detects parity inconsistency, the following events take place: - A message is logged to /etc/messages indicating that there is parity inconsistency. When you see this message, it is important to call Technical Support for help in determining the root cause of the problem. - Data ONTAP enables block checksums to ensure data integrity. When checksums are enabled, there is some performance degradation. If checksums are incorrect, Data ONTAP generates an error message similar to this one: Checksum mismatch on disk 4.0, block 436964 A file named /etc/crash/parity_inconsistencies is created. It contains information about disk scrubbing, which helps Technical Support solve the parity inconsistency problem. ========= end excerpt =============== I hope this helps. Anissa :-----Original Message----- :From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@cs.arizona.edu] :Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 9:21 AM :To: toasters(a)mathworks.com :Subject: checksum_blocks vol option? : : :Poking about now.netapp.com didn't turn up a lot of details about just :what this does -- or what sort of potential performance hit :there might be :when it's turned on. Is there a detailed discussion about :this somewhere, :or could someone in the know comment on it? Thanks! :

1 0

Re: NetApp and RDBMS (Oracle/Sybase)
by Mark D Fowle 11 Jan '00

11 Jan '00

We have Oracle running on our F720, F740 and F760 and have had no problems. Mark Fowle Metaphase/Oracle/Unix Administration Caterpillar - BCP Cary, North Carolina ptaylor(a)connectria.com on 01/11/2000 11:18:00 AM To: thomas.leavitt@clickrebates.com@INTERNET cc: toasters@mathworks.com@INTERNET (bcc: Mark D. Fowle/0V/Caterpillar) Subject: Re: NetApp and RDBMS (Oracle/Sybase) Retain Until: 02/10/2000 Retention Category: G90 - Information and Reports We use both an F760 and an F630. We run Oracle on them, and the DBA's like them. We have had no problems with them at all. Paul Taylor Sr. Systems Engineer Connectria 215-841-5540 On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Thomas Leavitt wrote: > Dear all... we are researching the purchase of a Network Applicance F740, > for which one of the primary uses would be service of a commercial RDBMS > (either Sybase or Oracle). Until I looked into this last week, I was unaware > this was possible and officially supported... I'm very enthusiastic about > the possibility - so far, feedback on this has been generally positive. I'm > looking for as many people as possible to help validate... > > Thomas > > -- > Thomas Leavitt -- thomas.leavitt(a)clickrebates.com; 408-591-3342 > Co-Founder/COO, ClickRebates.Com, Inc. (www.clickrebates.com) > Get Paid What You're Worth! > > Sign up for our pre-launch guest list and refer your friends! > > Or use our working prototype at www.clickrebates.org to "Surf for a Higher > Cause" (earn money for charity) >

1 0

NetApp and RDBMS (Oracle/Sybase)
by Thomas Leavitt 11 Jan '00

11 Jan '00

Dear all... we are researching the purchase of a Network Applicance F740, for which one of the primary uses would be service of a commercial RDBMS (either Sybase or Oracle). Until I looked into this last week, I was unaware this was possible and officially supported... I'm very enthusiastic about the possibility - so far, feedback on this has been generally positive. I'm looking for as many people as possible to help validate... Thomas -- Thomas Leavitt -- thomas.leavitt(a)clickrebates.com; 408-591-3342 Co-Founder/COO, ClickRebates.Com, Inc. (www.clickrebates.com) Get Paid What You're Worth! Sign up for our pre-launch guest list and refer your friends! Or use our working prototype at www.clickrebates.org to "Surf for a Higher Cause" (earn money for charity)

2 1

Re: Backing up with SAMS Alexandria
by Mark D Fowle 11 Jan '00

11 Jan '00

Quentin, We are also using Alexandria (although we wish we had something else) - We discovered that direct NFS mounts to the Alexandria server to the Netapps works best. We backup each top level directory and its associated sub directories and it seems to work fine. Mark Fowle Metahpase/Oracle/Unix Administration Caterpillar BCP Cary, North Carolina quentin.bracken(a)sabre.com on 01/10/2000 01:08:00 PM To: toasters@mathworks.com@INTERNET cc: (bcc: Mark D. Fowle/0V/Caterpillar) Subject: Backing up with SAMS Alexandria Retain Until: 02/09/2000 Retention Category: G90 - Information and Reports We are trying to backup 12 NetApp Filers using Alexandria. I was curious who else is trying to backup Filers with Alexandria and how they have implemented their solution. We have had a lot of troubles with doing Filer backups with Alexandria, especially with the Alexandria database. If anybody would care to describe their solutions, customizations, and tunings they needed, I would greatly appreciate it. -- Quentin C. Bracken Senior Systems Analyst Application Development UNIX Services, Sabre Inc. quentin.bracken(a)sabre.com

1 0

Re: NFS UDP xfer size
by jrg＠acm.org 11 Jan '00

11 Jan '00

On Mon 10 Jan, 2000, Paul Taylor <ptaylor(a)connectria.com> wrote: >options nfs.udp.xfersize <value> Don't forget that even if you set this, you've going to have to unmount and remount the filesystem in question. Previous discussions (April 1999 - check the archives) have covered this pretty well: http://teaparty.mathworks.com:1999/toasters/2648.html probably sums it up best. But other mentions of 'nfs.udp.xfersize' in there are worth reading too. It goes without saying that you should check release notes too, to be sure that there are no bugs at the root of the question you had nor with the things talked about in the above mail from the archive. James.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters