toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

4 participants
13526 discussions

Restricting CIFS
by Graydon Dodson 11 Sep '00

11 Sep '00

Anyone know of a way to restrict CIFS on a filer to certain network interfaces. Specificaly we need to turn it off on one interface. This interface is to a private net and we keep getting: No WINS servers are responding; still trying warnings clogging up the log. We want CIFS on the other interfaces and it can easily contact the wins servers on those nets. Thanks. Graydon Dodson grdodson(a)lexmark.com Lexmark International Inc.

2 1

RE: Restricting CIFS
by Krause, Oliver 11 Sep '00

11 Sep '00

You cannot restrict CIFS to an interface. you get rid of the error message if you configure the private interface with the "-wins" option. Then the filer doesn't try to register this ip on the wins server. Oliver > -----Original Message----- > From: Graydon Dodson [mailto:grdodson@lexmark.com] > Sent: Montag, 11. September 2000 22:09 > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Restricting CIFS > > > > Anyone know of a way to restrict CIFS on a filer to certain > network interfaces. > Specificaly we need to turn it off on one interface. This > interface is to > a private net and we keep getting: > > No WINS servers are responding; still trying > > warnings clogging up the log. We want CIFS on the other > interfaces and it can > easily contact the wins servers on those nets. > > > Thanks. > > Graydon Dodson > grdodson(a)lexmark.com > Lexmark International Inc. >

1 0

RE: creating a share with vba on a filer
by Uren, Jim 11 Sep '00

11 Sep '00

Hi Ulrich, from a DOS prompt, typing net helpmsg 2116 reveals this-- The device or directory does not exist. EXPLANATION You specified an unknown device or directory. ACTION Check the spelling of the device or directory name. so checking the pathname as suggested below seems like a good idea. as I recall, if you wish to use the "vol" form of the filename, you will want to put C$ in the pathname, such as: \\filer\c$\vol\vol0\sharename\directory but the \\filer\share\directory format should work just fine. check to see if c:\> dir \\cobfile01\users$ succeeds or not for example. Jim U > -----Original Message----- > From: Hawley, Rob [mailto:rob.hawley@netapp.com] > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 7:31 AM > To: 'Ulrich Neumann'; toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: RE: creating a share with vba on a filer > > > Your program looks correct. We do support using level 502 to > add a share. > Please confirm a couple of points that could be the source of > the problem: > > 1. The user running the script is a member of either the > filer's Administrators > group or is a member of Power Users. That is required for NT > compatible > security. > 2. That the path vol\nt01\users is the correct physical path > to where the user's > directory should be created. That is there are no other > directories in the path. > > If neither of these resolve your problem, then please contact > NetApp customer > support. They will need a packet trace of this exchange and a > cifs sessions -s > of the user attempting to execute the script. CS can help you > if you are > unfamiliar with how to get a packet trace. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > mailto: hawleyr(a)netapp.com US Mail: Network Appliance Inc. > Windows Networking Engineering 495 E Java Dr > Phone/pager: 408-822-6661 Sunnyvale, CA 94089 > http://www.netapp.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ulrich Neumann [mailto:ulrich.neumann@brose.de] > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 2:01 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: creating a share with vba on a filer > > << File: ShareErr2116Filer.txt >> we just turned our > user-home-shares from a > nt-server to a filer. > for creating new user-shares, we use a selfmade program in vb. > unfortunately this program woun't work now with the filer. > > neither "c:\vol\nt01\users\username" nor "\\cobfile01\users$\username" is working. there's always the error 2116.(see sub makeshare in attached code) is there anybody out there who has a good idea to solve this problem? greetings from brose GmbH & Co KG Client-Server-Technologien Ulrich Neumann

1 0

Re: Deleting snapshot
by Steve Kappel 11 Sep '00

11 Sep '00

Hi Stephen, Thanks for jumping in here and ending this thread. >It definitely does not seem appropriate to blame >the NDMP client. It is a filer specific issue. >Apologies to Steve Kappel. But I bet his >blood pressure wasn't high enough. ;) Naw, if I let a little thing like this bother me I'd be dead already ;) I'd rather not see this list turn into a blame game of any kind. We all have our good days and our not so good days. I would urge readers who have problems like this to use the support organizations of both NetApp and VERITAS. For at least the VERITAS side, if you are unhappy with an answer you get from the support organization please ask the support engineer to escalate the problem - use my name if you have to :) __________________________________________________________________________ Steve Kappel steve.kappel(a)veritas.com VERITAS Software steve.kappel(a)iname.com (Personal)

1 0

RE: creating a share with vba on a filer
by Hawley, Rob 11 Sep '00

11 Sep '00

Your program looks correct. We do support using level 502 to add a share. Please confirm a couple of points that could be the source of the problem: 1. The user running the script is a member of either the filer's Administrators group or is a member of Power Users. That is required for NT compatible security. 2. That the path vol\nt01\users is the correct physical path to where the user's directory should be created. That is there are no other directories in the path. If neither of these resolve your problem, then please contact NetApp customer support. They will need a packet trace of this exchange and a cifs sessions -s of the user attempting to execute the script. CS can help you if you are unfamiliar with how to get a packet trace. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mailto: hawleyr(a)netapp.com US Mail: Network Appliance Inc. Windows Networking Engineering 495 E Java Dr Phone/pager: 408-822-6661 Sunnyvale, CA 94089 http://www.netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Ulrich Neumann [mailto:ulrich.neumann@brose.de] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 2:01 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: creating a share with vba on a filer << File: ShareErr2116Filer.txt >> we just turned our user-home-shares from a nt-server to a filer. for creating new user-shares, we use a selfmade program in vb. unfortunately this program woun't work now with the filer. neither "c:\vol\nt01\users\username" nor "\\cobfile01\users$\username" is working. there's always the error 2116.(see sub makeshare in attached code) is there anybody out there who has a good idea to solve this problem? greetings from brose GmbH & Co KG Client-Server-Technologien Ulrich Neumann

1 0

creating a share with vba on a filer
by Ulrich Neumann 11 Sep '00

11 Sep '00

we just turned our user-home-shares from a nt-server to a filer. for creating new user-shares, we use a selfmade program in vb. unfortunately this program woun't work now with the filer. neither "c:\vol\nt01\users\username" nor "\\cobfile01\users$\username" is working. there's always the error 2116.(see sub makeshare in attached code) is there anybody out there who has a good idea to solve this problem? greetings from brose GmbH & Co KG Client-Server-Technologien Ulrich Neumann

1 0

Re: dlt autoloaders
by Darrell Fuhriman 09 Sep '00

09 Sep '00

Brian Tao <taob(a)risc.org> writes: > Out of curiosity, what's the aggregate throughput on your backups > to 12 DLT7000's? They should be able to do, what, 5MB/sec if you can > stream data to them consistently? 12 drives would be 60MB/sec... are You can push much more than that -- we sustain 10-12MB/sec to a DLT7000. > you actually seeing that much throughput over the network? Yes, we see 60MB/sec, and have pushed more in tests. Darrell

1 0

Re: gigabit ethernet performance
by Eyal Traitel 09 Sep '00

09 Sep '00

Only on 6.0 buddy... Eyal. --- Brian Tao <taob(a)risc.org> wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Eyal Traitel wrote: > > > > Have you considered Jumbo packets ? It could help you... > > How do you set a jumbo frame size on a Netapp? I recall trying a > few combinations of ifconfig invocations, but nothing would bump it > up > to 9K. > -- > Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) > "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" > ===== Yours, Eyal Traitel eTraitel(a)yahoo.com, Home: 972-3-5290415 (Tel Aviv) *** eTraitel - it's the new eBuzzword ! *** __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/

1 0

Re: gigabit ethernet performance
by Eyal Traitel 09 Sep '00

09 Sep '00

Marcus, Have you considered Jumbo packets ? It could help you... Eyal. Marcus Smiley <marcus.smiley(a)ericsson.com> wrote: Does anyone have any benchmarks/suggestions for poor performace with gigabit ethernet between Sun enterprise 220R and NetApp 740 with Intel GBII card? I have an open ticket w/Netapp and it's been open forever. These machines are directly attached (private network), and I've tried a mkfile and copying that file back during the day and at night (no load) and it makes no difference. The performance is ~ 10 MB/s, no matter what. The Sun is running Solaris 8, with latest GB Ethernet 3.0 drivers and patches. Also, the Sun box's only function is Legato server, so I've even stopped all nsr daemons while the test copy/mkfile is in progress, & it makes no difference. I've tried NFSv2 vs. NFSv3, with 32k size packets and 8k size packets. I've tried tcp and udp, with the same results. The /etc/system file on the E220R looks like this, for the ge adapter: * Increase size of STREAMS syncronized queues to increase network * performance. Release notes for qfe card recommends setting this * to 25 per 64Mbytes of RAM in the system. It also prevents * receive overrun on the GbE interface. msmiley 7/20/00 set sq_max_size=775 set ge:ge_adv_1000autoneg_cap=0 set ge:ge_adv_1000fdx_cap=1 set ge:ge_adv_pauseTX=1 Also, I've set tcp/udp specific stuff per the Netapp tech suppt. folks: ndd -set /dev/udp udp_recv_hiwat 65535 ndd -set /dev/udp udp_xmit_hiwat 65535 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_recv_hiwat 65535 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_xmit_hiwat 65535 The netapp is a 740 (5.3.6R1P1) with over 100GB of free space available on the volume I'm copying to/from. Interestingly enough, I have done a packet trace (pktt) on the GBII card and it looks OK. Also, the throughput from my 100BaseT card to the netapp (thru a catalyst 5500) does ~ 7.5 MB/s. *Any* input here would be much appreciated. -Marc Marcus Smiley | Ericsson Wireless Communications, Inc. Unix Sys Admin | 6210 Spine Rd. Boulder, CO 80301 | Ph (303) 473-6903 Yours, Eyal Traitel eTraitel(a)yahoo.com, Home: 972-3-5290415 (Tel Aviv) *** eTraitel - it's the new eBuzzword ! *** --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!

2 1

gigabit ethernet performance
by Marcus Smiley 09 Sep '00

09 Sep '00

Does anyone have any benchmarks/suggestions for poor performace with gigabit ethernet between Sun enterprise 220R and NetApp 740 with Intel GBII card? I have an open ticket w/Netapp and it's been open forever. These machines are directly attached (private network), and I've tried a mkfile and copying that file back during the day and at night (no load) and it makes no difference. The performance is ~ 10 MB/s, no matter what. The Sun is running Solaris 8, with latest GB Ethernet 3.0 drivers and patches. Also, the Sun box's only function is Legato server, so I've even stopped all nsr daemons while the test copy/mkfile is in progress, & it makes no difference. I've tried NFSv2 vs. NFSv3, with 32k size packets and 8k size packets. I've tried tcp and udp, with the same results. The /etc/system file on the E220R looks like this, for the ge adapter: * Increase size of STREAMS syncronized queues to increase network * performance. Release notes for qfe card recommends setting this * to 25 per 64Mbytes of RAM in the system. It also prevents * receive overrun on the GbE interface. msmiley 7/20/00 set sq_max_size=775 set ge:ge_adv_1000autoneg_cap=0 set ge:ge_adv_1000fdx_cap=1 set ge:ge_adv_pauseTX=1 Also, I've set tcp/udp specific stuff per the Netapp tech suppt. folks: ndd -set /dev/udp udp_recv_hiwat 65535 ndd -set /dev/udp udp_xmit_hiwat 65535 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_recv_hiwat 65535 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_xmit_hiwat 65535 The netapp is a 740 (5.3.6R1P1) with over 100GB of free space available on the volume I'm copying to/from. Interestingly enough, I have done a packet trace (pktt) on the GBII card and it looks OK. Also, the throughput from my 100BaseT card to the netapp (thru a catalyst 5500) does ~ 7.5 MB/s. *Any* input here would be much appreciated. -Marc Marcus Smiley | Ericsson Wireless Communications, Inc. Unix Sys Admin | 6210 Spine Rd. Boulder, CO 80301 | Ph (303) 473-6903

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters