toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13532 discussions

None
by Jaye Mathisen 24 Jun '97

24 Jun '97

Wanna kill your filer? Put lots of big directories with lots of files in there, then watch the nfs server not responding messages start up. I have an F540, 256MB RAM, and 8MB NVRAM that is just getting wiped out with numerous large directories. (~40-50k files/dir). Hangs of 20-30 seconds are not uncommon, sometimes as long as 3 minutes. Needless to say, we are not amused.

2 2

quick usenet poll
by Kenneth Whittaker 23 Jun '97

23 Jun '97

Usenet admins.... Just curious folks. How big are the history files out there? The history.pag? Ken. -- Kenneth Whittaker Network Appliance Technical Support: 888-4-NETAPP

5 12

Re: archive
by Tracy Howard 20 Jun '97

20 Jun '97

Brian, Some of these questions are answered on NOW, Netapp's online support solution. Check it out if you haven't already looked at the site. The URL for the site is http://now.netapp.com/. Also, for the questions that you pose here...I will make certain that they do get answered on NOW. Thanks. At 04:22 PM 6/20/97 -0400, Brian Tao wrote: >On Fri, 20 Jun 1997, Tom Yates wrote: >> >> b) no. volunteers? i haven't noticed any questions popping up >> repetitively yet, so i have 0 idea what would be on it. > > Well, these questions probably haven't been repeated all that >much, but getting answers to them would be a good start to a FAQ. > >1) What is a NetApp Model XYZ? [Have a brief feature list and >product position summary for anything NetApp ever made, like the >FAservers, the F220 vs. F210/F230, etc. Maybe we could get some >anecdotes related to the choice of faceplate colours for the various >filers ;-) ] > >2) What third-party components can I use? [Product number and >vendors for drives, RAM, cables, shelves and canisters. Include >suitable disclaimers that you may void your warranty or support >contract, etc.] > >3) How do I shrink the filesystem on a NetApp? [Heck, I haven't >figured this out... only way is backup to tape, restripe the whole >unit and restore from tape?] > >4) Why does Solaris 2.5 'du' not show the right file sizes? >[Actually, I think this is covered in the Solaris FAQ too] > >5) Why can't I put more than 52GB on an F210 or F220, even though it >can physically hold more? > > That's all I can think of at the moment. >-- >Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)netcom.ca) >"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" > > > *********************************************************** Tracy Howard Customer Satisfaction NOW Project Lead and Technical Writer tracyh(a)netapp.com now.netapp.com -->check it out

3 2

Re: Hello...
by sthaug＠nethelp.no 20 Jun '97

20 Jun '97

> I would be very interested to hear from other people using NetApps for > news spools for any advice on optimally configuring the NetApp for > this purpose. > > e.g., no snapshots, increase the number of inodes, no atime update, > disable NFS over TCP, ...? That last paragraph pretty much describes our situation - and it works like a charm! And yes, we have a private 100 Mbps Ethernet (crossover cable) between the Ultrasparc and the NetApp. We keep active, history and outgoing on local disk, and use the NetApp for articles and over- view. The Ultrasparc/Solaris 2.5.1/NetApp system has been *extremely* stable for us. Not a single crash of any kind during several months of service. It just runs. We're happy :-) Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug(a)nethelp.no

3 4

Re: quick usenet poll
by sthaug＠nethelp.no 20 Jun '97

20 Jun '97

> Are people actually putting history files on the NetApp? Ours isn't. Same here. I did what I thought was the obvious thing - put history, active, outgoing and logs on local disks. Use the NetApp for article and overview spool. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug(a)nethelp.no

1 0

Re: quick usenet poll
by sthaug＠nethelp.no 19 Jun '97

19 Jun '97

> Just curious folks. How big are the history files out there? > The history.pag? 14 days of history here (just after expire has trimmed it): -rw-rw-r-- 1 news news 407992941 Jun 20 00:50 history -rw-rw-r-- 1 news news 84156772 Jun 20 00:50 history.pag history.pag has holes. Real size is only about half of the apparent size given above. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug(a)nethelp.no

1 0

test - please ignore
by Tom Yates 19 Jun '97

19 Jun '97

please ignore this test. i apologise for the bandwidth loss. Tom Yates - Unix Chap - The Mathworks, Inc. - +1 (508) 647 7561 MAG#65061 DoD#0135 AMA#461546 1024/CFDFDE39 0C E7 46 60 BB 96 87 05 04 BD FB F8 BB 20 C1 8C "Microsoft (tm) is a single-sofa supplier"

1 0

SUBSCRIBE
by Patrick O'Malley, IAC, 617-393-3415 19 Jun '97

19 Jun '97

1 0

Re: NetApp v Suns
by dheiland＠lucent.com 18 Jun '97

18 Jun '97

> From hitz(a)netapp.com Tue Jun 17 22:22 BST 1997 > > It is important for people to understand that LADDIS is a very hard > load, and in real-world environments people will often see much higher > throughput than LADDIS would seem to predict. I recently got a note > from a customer "complaining" that his F230 was running at a sustained > load of over 3300 ops per second, which is over double the LADDIS > "limit" for that system. > > But don't assume that LADDIS results will limit the performance that > you see in a particular real-world environment. I see your point about NFS ops. I would guess then that if this customer was seeing a high percentage usage of the cpu then that would be the indicator that the box was overloaded. And that's not something one can easily extrapolate from the cpu performance of Suns or any other boxes. Estimating the size of filer needed doesn't seem very straightforward then, except by disk sizes. Dave

1 0

Re: NetApp v Suns
by Ketil Kirkerud 18 Jun '97

18 Jun '97

Dave Heiland <dheiland(a)lucent.com> writes: [...] > What kind of loading are people seeing on > their netapps, e.g. 500nfs ops, 2000 nfs ops, any over the limit of the > F540? I've seen 2223 nfsops/sec on _average_ over 6 hours on one of our 540s. It peaked around 6000 :-) (for a few minutes) By the way - This is from our 330 : Wed Jun 18 10:00:05 MET [statd]: 10:00am up 91 days, 18:07 -1750342549 NFS ops I just _love_ the signed 32-bit nfs-op counter - the log looks quite interesting : Tue Jun 3 14:00:05 MET [statd]: 2:00pm up 76 days, 23:27 2145791234 NFS ops Tue Jun 3 15:00:05 MET [statd]: 3:00pm up 77 days, 27 mins, -2147354925 NFS ops -- ---Ketil Kirkerud, Scandinavia Online I synergistically leverage my paradigms

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters