toasters June 2011

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

24 participants
15 discussions

one cifs share from two vols ?
by Chaim Rieger 22 Jun '11

22 Jun '11

say i have vol/vol1 and vol/vol2 i want to create a cifs share \\cifs\share1 that shares out /vol/vol1 as \\cifs\share1 and /vol/vol2 as \\cifs\share1\share2 is this possible or would i have to create a second share \\cifs\share1\share2 for the second volume ?

2 1

volume, qtree snapmirror resync question
by Steve Losen 20 Jun '11

20 Jun '11

Hi Toasters, We have recently upgraded to ONTAP 8.0.1 and are migrating to 64 bit aggrs/vols. Quick question: Say I have 32 bit volume A on primary storage being volume snapmirrored to 32 bit volume B on secondary storage. A has one qtree, then entire volume itself. I create 64 bit volume C on secondary storage and use qtree snapmirror to copy /vol/B/- to /vol/C/qtree Is there any way to resync C and A now? Will this work on secondary? snapmirror resync -S primary:/vol/A/- /vol/C/qtree I suppose I must snapmirror break the B, C relationship first. If this will work then we can migrate a lot of our secondary storage to 64 bit without heavily impacting primary storage. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

Truncated SSH ouptut on 8.x?
by A Darren Dunham 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

Anyone seen differences with SSH command output on 8.x filers? I've encountered this a few times lately, and as best I can tell it's always been on 8.x machines. It appears to be more likely to happen on the first command to a filer in a while. I'll run something like "ssh <filer> exportfs" and either get a line or two or just a normal prompt returned with no output. Never an error. Then I'll just repeat the last command and get full output. In fact I can repeat it multiple times and never see the error again. There is a KB article that seems similar (https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&id=2013198), but it's not really the same, affects 7.x, and the variable that is mentioned to resolve doesn't seem appropriate. I don't have a lot of hard data on this, I'm not prepared to open a ticket on just yet. But I'm wondering if others have seen it. Thanks, -- Darren

1 0

RE: Hot remove disk shelves?
by Steiner, Jeffrey 02 Jun '11

02 Jun '11

I've heard that asked before, and the answer was no. The issue was something about internal device maps. The filers build maps of which devices are where on the loops, and that includes the shelf itself as well as the drives. Both controllers are aware of the shelves at all times, even if they aren't actually using disks inside them. The only safe way to remove the shelf is at a time when neither controller is aware of it, and that means when both are off. >-----Original Message----- >From: Borzenkov, Andrey [mailto:andrey.borzenkov@ts.fujitsu.com] >Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 4:06 PM >To: Steiner, Jeffrey; Blake Golliher; Steve Losen >Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: RE: Hot remove disk shelves? > >Would it be possible via takeover/giveback? I.e. - takeover node2, >unplug shelf on node2 side then do the same with node1? Would it still >lead to problem mentioned? > > >--- >With best regards > >Andrey Borzenkov >Senior system engineer >Service operations > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] >On Behalf Of Steiner, Jeffrey >Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 6:45 PM >To: Blake Golliher; Steve Losen >Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: RE: Hot remove disk shelves? > >It may appear to work at first, but you'll have a panic and crash >eventually. It might last a week or two, but you'll eventually have >problems. > >If you move quick and you have your FC/NFS timeouts set right, you can >shut down, decable the shelves, and turn it back on before hosts will >notice. I've done that myself more than a few times. > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Blake Golliher [mailto:thelastman@gmail.com] >>Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 3:07 PM >>To: Steve Losen >>Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com >>Subject: Re: Hot remove disk shelves? >> >>I've seen people do this without problems, but I've not had to do it >>yet myself. Having the disks unassigned is a good idea since you'll >>want them unowned when you add them to other heads. If you can afford >>to do it while in takeover mode that probably couldn't hurt. >> >>Let us know how it goes. I'm under the impression this works, but is >>unsupported from netapp eng still. >> >>-Blake >> >>On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Steve Losen ><scl(a)sasha.acc.virginia.edu> >>wrote: >>> >>> Hello Toasters, >>> >>> We have a FAS3170 HA pair with some SATA disk shelves (AT-FCX) >>> attached to the end of a chain where none of the disks are in use >>> (all are spares, all have ownership assigned). We are running >>> ONTAP 8.0.1. >>> >>> The chain is singly attached to both controllers, i.e., the >>> shelf "A" modules are chained to a single FC adapter on one >>> controller and the shelf "B" modules are chained to a single >>> FC adapter on the other controller. >>> >>> The shelves we want to remove are at the far end of the chain. >>> Essentially we want to undo the result of a hot shelf add without >>> downtime. >>> >>> Is it possible to hot remove these shelves? Would it help to >>> "un-own" the disks first? >>> >>> I suppose this could be done using CF takeover/giveback >>> but that might be too disruptive. >>> >>> Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 >>> >>> University of Virginia ITC Unix Support >>> >>> >>> >

2 1

Hot remove disk shelves?
by Steve Losen 02 Jun '11

02 Jun '11

Hello Toasters, We have a FAS3170 HA pair with some SATA disk shelves (AT-FCX) attached to the end of a chain where none of the disks are in use (all are spares, all have ownership assigned). We are running ONTAP 8.0.1. The chain is singly attached to both controllers, i.e., the shelf "A" modules are chained to a single FC adapter on one controller and the shelf "B" modules are chained to a single FC adapter on the other controller. The shelves we want to remove are at the far end of the chain. Essentially we want to undo the result of a hot shelf add without downtime. Is it possible to hot remove these shelves? Would it help to "un-own" the disks first? I suppose this could be done using CF takeover/giveback but that might be too disruptive. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

5 4

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters June 2011