toasters July 2006

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

155 participants
187 discussions

Samba-JP:BANNED (multipart/mixed | application/octet-stream,.zip,attachment.zip | .exe,.exe-ms,attachment.html ... .pif) IN MAIL FROM YOU
by Content-filter at sydney.samba.gr.jp 12 Jul '06

12 Jul '06

BANNED CONTENTS ALERT Our content checker found banned name: multipart/mixed | application/octet-stream,.zip,attachment.zip | .exe,.exe-ms,attachment.html ... .pif in email presumably from you (<toasters(a)mathworks.com>), to the following recipient: -> samba-jp(a)samba.gr.jp First upstream SMTP client IP address: [58.90.44.47] p2047-ipad404osakakita.osaka.ocn.ne.jp According to the 'Received:' trace, the message originated at: [58.90.44.47] Our internal reference code for your message is 10436-06/FZidqC45AOP7. Delivery of the email was stopped! The message has been blocked because it contains a component (as a MIME part or nested within) with declared name or MIME type or contents type violating our access policy. To transfer contents that may be considered risky or unwanted by site policies, or simply too large for mailing, please consider publishing your content on the web, and only sending an URL of the document to the recipient. Depending on the recipient and sender site policies, with a little effort it might still be possible to send any contents (including viruses) using one of the following methods: - encrypted using pgp, gpg or other encryption methods; - wrapped in a password-protected or scrambled container or archive (e.g.: zip -e, arj -g, arc g, rar -p, or other methods) Note that if the contents is not intended to be secret, the encryption key or password may be included in the same message for recipient's convenience. We are sorry for inconvenience if the contents was not malicious. The purpose of these restrictions is to cut the most common propagation methods used by viruses and other malware. These often exploit automatic mechanisms and security holes in more popular mail readers (Microsoft mail readers and browsers are a common target). By requiring an explicit and decisive action from the recipient to decode mail, the dangers of automatic malware propagation is largely reduced. For your reference, here are headers from your email: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from mathworks.com (p2047-ipad404osakakita.osaka.ocn.ne.jp [58.90.44.47]) by sydney.samba.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C88A100522 for <samba-jp(a)samba.gr.jp>; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:08:21 +0900 (JST) From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: samba-jp(a)samba.gr.jp Subject: Message could not be delivered Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:16:16 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_88933479.71ECC137" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20060712040821.5C88A100522(a)sydney.samba.gr.jp> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------

1 0

RE: mixing disk RPMs in aggregate?
by Glenn Walker 12 Jul '06

12 Jul '06

Steve, Mixing drives in the way you expanded your aggregate is perfectly fine. If anything, you've added raid groups that have a better performance footprint, so you may see an overall increase in performance as WAFL writes across raidgroups during CPs. The performance issues you mentioned would come from adding a slower drive to a RG with faster drives - thus bringing down the overall performance (this is not the case in your situation). You should attempt to keep one spare of each drive type if at all possible, but ONTAP will select a drive of lesser speed if no other spare is available. Summary: The thing to avoid here is adding slower drives to raid groups with faster drives, or allowing a failed drive to rebuild on a drive with a slower speed thus bringing down the overall performance of the RG\AGGR. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Stephen C. Losen Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:11 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: mixing disk RPMs in aggregate? We just bought two new shelves of ATA drives to enlarge an aggregate on our R200 and the new drives are all 7200 RPM while the old drives are 5400 RPM, same size though. It looks like ONTAP will let me add the new disks to the aggregate if I use the -f (force) flag. I'm inclined to force, unless this ruin performance or make the filer crash. We keep two hot spares, so should I have one of each RPM? Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

2 1

RE: mixing disk RPMs in aggregate?
by Fox, Adam 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

It won't make the filer crash, but you may not get any performance benefit out of the faster drives. If you're keeping 2 spares, one of each would probably be best. -- Adam Fox adamfox(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Stephen C. Losen [mailto:scl@sasha.acc.virginia.edu] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:11 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: mixing disk RPMs in aggregate? We just bought two new shelves of ATA drives to enlarge an aggregate on our R200 and the new drives are all 7200 RPM while the old drives are 5400 RPM, same size though. It looks like ONTAP will let me add the new disks to the aggregate if I use the -f (force) flag. I'm inclined to force, unless this ruin performance or make the filer crash. We keep two hot spares, so should I have one of each RPM? Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

Home textiles from India
by Dinesh Bansal 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us"> <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0"> <meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> <title>Buyer are waiting for you</title> </head> <body> <table width="560" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="4" bgcolor="#3879a7"> <tr> <td bgcolor="#ffffff"> <table width="571" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td bgcolor="#ff7300" align="center" valign="middle" height="50" width="542"> Supplier is waiting for you.</td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top" style="padding:12px; font:13px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" width="518"> Dear Sir/Madam We are Indian Manufacturers & Exporters of all type of 1)Blankets for                      Donation, Relief,                      Military, Air-force,                      Hotel, Hospitals                      Railways,                      Home etc. 2) Rugs:      Cotton Rugs                    Woollen Rugs                    Chenniel Rugs                    Rag Rugs                    Braided Rugs 3) Bath rugs, bath mats, 4) Table-covers, throws, etc. 5) Table-mats Please visit us at: <a href="http://www.freewebs.com/vaibhavexports"> www.freewebs.com/vaibhavexports</a> Our quality is best and prices are competitive. We can work with you to expand our business under mutual benefit conditions. Best Regards Dinesh Bansal Vaibhav Exports 603, Sector-12, Urban Estate Panipat-132103 India Tel-fax: +91-180-4001277 Mobile: +91-9416221083, 9416001277 E-mail: vaibhavexports(a)rediffmail.com Yahoo: din2ban MSN: din2ban Skype: dinesh.bansal  </td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top" style="padding:12px; font:13px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" width="518">  </td> </tr> </table> </table> </body> </html>

1 0

mixing disk RPMs in aggregate?
by Stephen C. Losen 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

We just bought two new shelves of ATA drives to enlarge an aggregate on our R200 and the new drives are all 7200 RPM while the old drives are 5400 RPM, same size though. It looks like ONTAP will let me add the new disks to the aggregate if I use the -f (force) flag. I'm inclined to force, unless this ruin performance or make the filer crash. We keep two hot spares, so should I have one of each RPM? Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

RE: SFTP Access to filer
by Fox, Adam 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

Not currently. This is RFE #90394. You (and any other customers out there) are welcome to call into Tech. Support and ask them to add you to the customer list of that bug/rfe #. It can only help raise priority. -- Adam Fox adamfox(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Willeke, Jochen [mailto:Jochen.Willeke@wincor-nixdorf.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 9:57 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: SFTP Access to filer Hi Toasters, as i have read a lot about accessing a filer via ftp i am still wondering if i can use SFTP also. I have not found anything on this on NOW. Has anybody ever made experience with this? Thanks in advance Jochen

1 0

SFTP Access to filer
by Willeke, Jochen 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

Hi Toasters, as i have read a lot about accessing a filer via ftp i am still wondering if i can use SFTP also. I have not found anything on this on NOW. Has anybody ever made experience with this? Thanks in advance Jochen

1 0

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
by postmaster＠ineco.es 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. addreugenia.ortiz(a)ineco.es

1 0

Disallowed attachment type found in sent message "Returned mail: Data format error"
by System Anti-Virus Administrator 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

Attention: toasters(a)mathworks.com A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: .COM files not allowed per Systinet security policy Please contact your IT support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: toasters(a)mathworks.com RCPT TO: jacek(a)idoox.com ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: toasters(a)mathworks.com Received: from 185.65.179.60.broad.nb.zj.dynamic.cndata.com (HELO mathworks.com) (60.179.65.185) by relaycz.systinet.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2006 10:02:25 -0000 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: jacek(a)idoox.com Subject: Returned mail: Data format error Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:02:18 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_1EFB2310.E8AA3EE8" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 --- The original message is kept in: relaycz:/var/qmail/qmailscan/quarantine/new/relaycz115261214649422808 where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type '.COM files not allowed per Systinet security policy' found in file /var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/relaycz115261214649422808/jacek_idoox.com ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type '.COM files not allowed per Systinet security policy' found in file /var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/relaycz115261214649422808/jacek(a)idoox.com --- ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________

1 0

FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT
by gladwell_odieno2＠virgilio.it 10 Jul '06

10 Jul '06

FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT FROM MR.GLADWELL ODIENO TI-KENYA Dear Friend, FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT I humbly seek your assistance in a business transaction that requires your ability to invest on our behalf for a minimum period of 5years, without the inference of a third party. The fund emanated from individual wealth of former government officials in the administration of Mr Daniel Arap-moi former president kenya. contract kick - back I now wish to relocate the funds to you for safe keeping/Investment, hence my decision to contact you. Details would be disclosed on your ability to handle this transaction legally and the possibility to have my lawyer meet with you in europe. The fund for the investment is valued at $ 20 Million. Thanks and look forward to your response. Regards, Gladwell Odieno. Executive Director Transparency International Kenya. Confidentila Email: gladwellodieno00(a)aim.com

1 0

← Newer
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters July 2006