toasters February 2003

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

104 participants
136 discussions

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Jay Newton (Email) 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Can you tell us why? I've had no problems from Trend. -----Original Message----- From: Steve Evans [mailto:sevans@foundation.sdsu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:36 PM To: Wurster, Richard M DSTI; Pucky, Todd M.; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Steer clear of TrendMicro. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation (619) 594-0653 _____ From: Wurster, Richard M DSTI [mailto:rick.wurster2@us.army.mil] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:13 PM To: 'Pucky, Todd M.'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' We use Symantec's CarrierScan for the Filer (740). Works well. Rick Wurster SBCCOM / DSTI 410-436-3824 DSN 584-3824 < mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil <mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil> > -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [ mailto:Puckyt@timken.com <mailto:Puckyt@timken.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

Re: using vol0
by Rune Bakken 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Charles Bartels <cbartels(a)openharbor.com> writes: > Hi, > > I'm configuring an F810 and space is going to be a little tight. How do > people feel about adding disks to vol0 and using that instead of creating a > whole separate volume (and burning a another parity disk) ? Not sure if it is an issue, but I will never have any production data that keeps growing on vol0 again. I had a Filer panic once or twice because vol0 got filled up. I know some admins on this lists put static data that they control on with a qtree with fixed size (tree quota) on vol0. >>>>>>>>>>.rune -- Rune Bakken Senior System Administrator Telenor Business Solutions (Nextra), ManagedServices/*/IP-Services http://ips.telenor.net/

2 1

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Steve Evans 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Steer clear of TrendMicro. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation (619) 594-0653 _____ From: Wurster, Richard M DSTI [mailto:rick.wurster2@us.army.mil] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:13 PM To: 'Pucky, Todd M.'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' We use Symantec's CarrierScan for the Filer (740). Works well. Rick Wurster SBCCOM / DSTI 410-436-3824 DSN 584-3824 <mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil> -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [mailto:Puckyt@timken.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

using vol0
by Charles Bartels 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Hi, I'm configuring an F810 and space is going to be a little tight. How do people feel about adding disks to vol0 and using that instead of creating a whole separate volume (and burning a another parity disk) ? -Charles Bartels

2 1

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Wurster, Richard M DSTI 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

We use Symantec's CarrierScan for the Filer (740). Works well. Rick Wurster SBCCOM / DSTI 410-436-3824 DSN 584-3824 <mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil> -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [mailto:Puckyt@timken.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by tedvanegas 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Right now we are evaluating Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine 4.0, it specifically supports the NetApp filers; and runs in real time. So far our testing of the product has gone well. Ted -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [mailto:Puckyt@timken.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

RE: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP
by Jay Newton (Email) 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

It's a special release to fix this bug. The bug number is 85559. You have to do a priv set diag and run rtag -t malloc. Look for JAVA having to do with NDMP. If you see this line, watch it for a day or 2. If the numbers increment, you have the leak. You really should never see the JAVA NDMP tape device line at all. Hope this helps! -----Original Message----- From: Francett, Robert D (SAIC) [mailto:FranceRD@BP.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:44 PM To: 'Jay Newton (Email)'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP Jay, Checking to see if this is affecting us, however I could not find info on DOT 6.2.2d8 on NOW. Do you know the bug number of the NDMP memory problem? Thanks, Bob Francett BP Exploration -----Original Message----- From: Jay Newton (Email) [mailto:jnewton@chkenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:33 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP We are experiencing issues with NDMP backups. I'm hoping other people in this group have seen it as well and may have suggestions for us to try. Here's an explanation of what has happened. On 12-13-2002 we upgraded from 6.1.3r2 to 6.2.1r2 to fix issues with Autosupports not being sent in the event of hardware failure. A couple of things went sour after the upgrade. Our SnapManager for Exchange performance went down more than 30%, NDMP backups would run slow intermittently, and general Filer performance got worse. NetApp discovered a memory leak in 6.2.1r2 in the NDMP daemon about the same time we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. We had to upgrade to 6.2.2d8 to fix that issue. However, a backup or two will invariably run slower than the rest. If the backup is restarted, it usually picks up speed and runs normally. By slow I mean 10 gigs in 10 hours on a DLT8000 drive. I used to get 20-30 gig per hour before we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. This can happen with each of the 4 DLT8000 drives attached to the Filer meaning that I can't pin the problem to a bad piece of hardware. Today we have discovered that snapshots for backup are not deleting correctly. The NDMPD process was holding the snapshot hostage. A volume ran out of space due to this issue. We were able to kill the NDMPD sessions that were holding the snapshot open and the snapshot deleted normally. Has anyone else experienced similar issues? For those of you running SnapManager for Exchange, how big are your databases and how long does it take to verify them? Also, those who run multiple backups, what is your CPU utilization like when running 4 simultaneous backups and what is your tape throughput? DataONTAP 6.2.2d8 Commvault Galaxy 3.7.1 SP4 ATL P2000 library with 4 DLT8000 drives attached to Filer on 2 SCSI HVD controllers (2 drives per controller) Thanks! Jay Newton Systems Engineer Chesapeake Energy Corporation Natural Gas - Natural Advantages Building 6112, Room 114 (405)848-8000 ext. 683 jnewton(a)chkenergy.com

1 0

RE: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP
by Francett, Robert D (SAIC) 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Jay, Checking to see if this is affecting us, however I could not find info on DOT 6.2.2d8 on NOW. Do you know the bug number of the NDMP memory problem? Thanks, Bob Francett BP Exploration -----Original Message----- From: Jay Newton (Email) [mailto:jnewton@chkenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:33 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP We are experiencing issues with NDMP backups. I'm hoping other people in this group have seen it as well and may have suggestions for us to try. Here's an explanation of what has happened. On 12-13-2002 we upgraded from 6.1.3r2 to 6.2.1r2 to fix issues with Autosupports not being sent in the event of hardware failure. A couple of things went sour after the upgrade. Our SnapManager for Exchange performance went down more than 30%, NDMP backups would run slow intermittently, and general Filer performance got worse. NetApp discovered a memory leak in 6.2.1r2 in the NDMP daemon about the same time we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. We had to upgrade to 6.2.2d8 to fix that issue. However, a backup or two will invariably run slower than the rest. If the backup is restarted, it usually picks up speed and runs normally. By slow I mean 10 gigs in 10 hours on a DLT8000 drive. I used to get 20-30 gig per hour before we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. This can happen with each of the 4 DLT8000 drives attached to the Filer meaning that I can't pin the problem to a bad piece of hardware. Today we have discovered that snapshots for backup are not deleting correctly. The NDMPD process was holding the snapshot hostage. A volume ran out of space due to this issue. We were able to kill the NDMPD sessions that were holding the snapshot open and the snapshot deleted normally. Has anyone else experienced similar issues? For those of you running SnapManager for Exchange, how big are your databases and how long does it take to verify them? Also, those who run multiple backups, what is your CPU utilization like when running 4 simultaneous backups and what is your tape throughput? DataONTAP 6.2.2d8 Commvault Galaxy 3.7.1 SP4 ATL P2000 library with 4 DLT8000 drives attached to Filer on 2 SCSI HVD controllers (2 drives per controller) Thanks! Jay Newton Systems Engineer Chesapeake Energy Corporation Natural Gas - Natural Advantages Building 6112, Room 114 (405)848-8000 ext. 683 jnewton(a)chkenergy.com

1 0

RE: spam
by Carl R. Friend 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

James Beal writes: >I refer the gentleman to Kevin's message below and point out that >Kevin and the mathworks are doing the community a favour so I am >willing to give him a reasonable amount of time to fix it as his not >paid to fix this problem. We just turned SpamAssassin back on again. The S/N ratio ought to improve some. +----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+ | Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | The MathWorks | | Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Natick, Massachusetts | | mailto:carl_friend@mathworks.com +-----------------------+ | http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum/ | ICBM: 42:18N 71:21W | +----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+

1 0

spam
by Charles Bartels 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

It would be nice if the administrator of this list put in some spam control. It's getting a bit ridiculous. What does everyone else think? -Charles Bartels

5 4

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters February 2003