toasters July 2002

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

55 participants
65 discussions

RE: moving files between filers
by Chan, Paul 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

For more information on how to go about doing it using ndmp see: http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs2471 Paul Chan NOW KB team -----Original Message----- From: Igor Schein [mailto:igor@txc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:56 AM To: Caven, Marilyn Cc: 'Geoff Hardin'; toasters Subject: Re: moving files between filers On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:19:40AM -0700, Caven, Marilyn wrote: > If the development data is on a separate volume from the production data you … [View More]

1 0

RE: moving files between filers
by Caven, Marilyn 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

If the development data is on a separate volume from the production data you can do a volcopy which works quite well. There is an option to turn up the throttle of the volcopy to 10 (max) on source filer. The destination volume must be offline when the data is being copied and it will write over anything on the destination volume. If the dev and prod data is on the same volume, I've always used tar and directed the output to a nfs mounted filesystem from another filer. Marilyn Next Level … [View More]

2 1

RE: moving files between filers
by Flaherty, Michael 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

volcopy does work well, the destination volume blocks are copied identically to the source volume. One benefit of using ndmpcopy is that the data is written contiguously which will eliminate any fragmentation. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Caven, Marilyn [mailto:mcaven@nlc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:20 AM To: 'Geoff Hardin'; toasters Subject: RE: moving files between filers If the development data is on a separate volume from the production data you can do a volcopy … [View More]

1 0

moving files between filers
by Geoff Hardin 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

What is the preferred method of moving directories between filers? I was wondering what method the toaster community in general preferred. In the past I have used tar from my UNIX admin host, rsync, dump/restore, ndmpcopy, and cp. I have about given up on ndmpcopy because even across GbE, I see better thruput using tar or dump/restore. A couple of the admins I've spoken to swear by rsync, but I have only used it sparingly. I have a clustered pair of F760s, one filer for a production … [View More]

1 0

Anybody using a F740 for clearcase vobs
by Kumar, Rahul 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

Hi all, Is anybody using a toater for clearcase 4.2. Why I am putting it here is because I need to the real life scenarios of it implementation. If anybody could help me that'll be really great. I have gone though the netapp site wherein they mention about the same. Rahul Rahul Kumar Infrastructure Analyst Rahul.Kumar(a)eds.com 91-20-2930812 -----Original Message----- From: Chris Miles [mailto:chris@psychofx.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:07 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: … [View More]

2 1

RE: disable boot menu
by Kiernan, Michael 23 Jul '02

23 Jul '02

Great minds think alike ;). This is an RFE internally 75510 for reading and writing OBP vars from the running OS. I've added your comments to the bug to add some momentum to it. Regards, Mike Kiernan -----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:23 PM To: scl(a)sasha.acc.virginia.edu Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: disable boot menu scl(a)sasha.acc.virginia.edu (Steve Losen) writes: > > > One of my F760s … [View More]

1 0

ONTAP 6.2.1 vs 6.2R2D6 vs ???
by Chris Thompson 22 Jul '02

22 Jul '02

I am wondering which release of ONTAP I should be running on a leading-edge (but production) server here... We are currently running 6.2R2D2 --- the D2 part because we wanted the fix for 70674. We usually run the FCS release, but not a Dx one, so this makes me somewhat uneasy. Now 6.2.1 is out and FCS, and has 70674 in its fix list, so it would be natural to change to that. But meanwhile we've got the question of 75012 (the CA-2002-19 bug-in- -most-known-DNS-resolvers thing) outstanding. We … [View More]

2 4

Ownership of "/etc"
by David Lee 22 Jul '02

22 Jul '02

On both our new filers, running 6.1.2R1, I have just noticed that the ownership of its "/vol/vol0/etc" belongs, not to the expected "root", but to an apparently arbitrary uid "20041" (gid "30"). Fortunately: (a) we have not allocated that uid to anyone; (b) I think the only machine to which "/etc" would be user-accessible (a Solaris UNIX box fro our user admin.) can have access restrictions to prevent telnet/ssh-like user-access. Nevertheless, it does seem a little worrying (… [View More]correction, potentially very worrying) that this critical "/etc" directory is owned by an ordinary user. (Just suppose this October's student intake allocates that uid to someone who likes exploring...) All the contents of "/etc" are root-owned, except for a subdirectory called "java" and within that some (not all) of its contents: drwxr-xr-x 3 20041 30 4096 Jun 11 08:11 . drwxr-xr-x 20 20041 30 65536 Jul 22 14:53 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 1912820 Jan 9 2002 .jitcache.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1912820 May 14 14:05 .jitcache.db.saved -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 8844945 Jan 8 2002 classes.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 8844945 Jan 8 2002 classes.zip-inuse -rw-r--r-- 1 20041 30 238737 Oct 13 2000 crysec.zip -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 139895 Jun 14 00:35 jit.log -rw-r--r-- 1 20041 30 505097 Oct 13 2000 jsafe.zip drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 May 14 14:05 lib -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 1422554 Jan 8 2002 netapp.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 1422554 Jan 8 2002 netapp.zip-inuse -rw-r--r-- 1 20041 30 217093 Oct 13 2000 phaos.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 1942824 Jan 8 2002 redshift.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 1942824 Jan 8 2002 redshift.zip-inuse -rw-r--r-- 1 20041 30 113216 Oct 13 2000 secureadmin.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 139753 Jan 8 2002 servlet.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 139753 Jan 8 2002 servlet.zip-inuse Is this general, affecting other sites, or does it suggest that something peculiar happened at our installation? I understand that, since site installation, we have had something added: from memory, I think it was "Secure FilerView", but I may be wrong, and the local person who oversaw this is currently away. Any comments, anyone? -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. : [View Less]

3 2

quotas over limit: determination thereof
by David Lee 20 Jul '02

20 Jul '02

If what follows is in the manual or is a FAQ, then just point me in the direction... Executive summary: Is there an easy way (variant of "quota report" perhaps?) to discover which users are over-quota? Detail: We are beginning to migrate our home directories (15K-20K of them) from Solaris to NetApp. Quotas are a vital part of the control of these directories. Under Solaris (trad. UNIX), each user has an explicit quota. While this is possible under NetApp, it seems far more sensible to use … [View More]

2 1

RE: arp spoof, 840 with 6.2.1
by Toal, Dave 19 Jul '02

19 Jul '02

Brian, Snapmirror and vol copy turned out not to be an option, because the 760 is at 5.3.1; we're getting the 'volume is in transitional state, aborting' error even though the destination is offline. NDMP copy looks like the remaining method, the 760 is being upgraded to 6.2.1 and I want to duplicate the data before starting that. Piotr, Yes, disks and data too. %-{)# What I saw from the first attempt was no response to ping, on either side, even after doing ifconfig down/up of the … [View More]e9b nic. Maybe the magic arp has leaked out the switch I was using? After connecting the original filer I had to do arp -d and ping again, before it would respond to the unix host mount request. -----Original Message----- From: Brian Long To: Toal, Dave Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Sent: 7/19/02 10:37 AM Subject: Re: arp spoof, 840 with 6.2.1 Dave, Are you replicating the data to the F840 or just moving shelves? If you're replicating data with something like Snapmirror, you might consider the Ontap 6.X snapmirror migrate command. This alters the disk labels on the destination so you don't end up with stale NFS filehandles on all the clients (if you're using NFS). For CIFS, you don't need to worry about this. /Brian/ > Good morning. I've got a question about substituting > one netapp for another, by setting the ip addresses the same > and changing the ethernet cable going to the switch from one > to the other. > > The netapp I'm trying to bring online is the 840. The > ether (mac) addresses are showing different from inconfig, and > I'm wondering if there's a way to set that explicitly; I don't > see it from the options listed. > > > > the 840: > > netapp-demo*> ifconfig e9b > e9b: flags=48043<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 206.33.27.85 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 206.33.27.127 > ether 00:20:fc:1e:3a:75 (100tx-fd-down) > netapp-demo*> > > > > > > the other netapp, a 760 running 5.3.6R1: > > wesson> ifconfig e0 > e0: flags=200043<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING> mtu 1500 > inet 206.33.27.85 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 206.33.27.127 > partner inet 206.33.27.86 (not in use) > ether 00:a0:98:00:78:c5 (100tx-fd-up) > wesson> > > > > > > -- > Dave Toal > Thomson & Thomson > North Quincy, MA > > > -- Brian Long | | | Americas IT Hosting Sys Admin | .|||. .|||. Phone: (919) 392-7363 | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:.. Pager: (888) 651-2015 | C i s c o S y s t e m s [View Less]

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters July 2002