Hi,
whenever I use user name instead of UID I will get
below error :
toaster>quota on web
quota: user name ihsan not found (/etc/quota line 2).
could not read quotas file
toaster>
content of /vol/vol0/etc/quotas
ihsan user@/vol/web 5M
* user@/vol/web 3M
It won't fail if I use UID
Any suggestion ?
I tried putting clients /etc/passwd in
/vol/vol0/etc/passwd and it works.
Do we have to have a /vol/vol0/etc/passwd ?
If so, how about if we have let say 100000 users ?
there has to be …
[View More]a smarter way which a newbie like me
do not know of...
thanks,
--abu ihsan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/
[View Less]
No account/password is required for *NIX access to the filer via NFS; that's
all handled via the standard NFS permissions and *NIX filesystem
permissions.
As to running Oracle with the data and logfiles on a filer via NFS, I should
think that even with a NetApp using Gigabit Ethernet, you'd take a -huge-
performance hit as compared to a local disk array. I've no empirical data
to back this up, mind you; it's just that there's so much overhead
associated with NFS even on an optimized platform …
[View More]like the NetApp filer, I
can't see it as being a win.
If there's anyone out there with Oracle experience on filers via NFS, either
pro or con, I'd love to hear from you.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins(a)netmore.net> // 818.535.5024 voice
-----Original Message-----
From: Jiang, Perry [mailto:Perry.Jiang@BMO.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 2:18 PM
To: toasters
Subject: NetApp questions
Hi, there
I have a question regarding NetApp Filer 740.
Oracle account
I am running a Solaris Oracle server, which is a NFS client of the NetApp
Filer. Do I have to
create an Oracle account on NetApp Filer and put the entry in
/vol/vol0/etc/passwd?
If yes, what the purpose of that?
An on-line NetApp document, "Oracle for UNIX: Integrating with a NetApp
Filer", stated that you need to create an Oracle account on Filer. However,
according to the System Admin. Guide, /vol/vol0/etc/passwd is only for CIFS,
not for NFS.
You explaination is appreciated.
Perr Jiang
[View Less]
I have a few snapshot questions for anyone else who's running Oracle:
1. Does a hot backup (as described on
http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3049.html) present any
restoration problems? Has anyone done a restore from a hot
backup?
2. Hot backups are as close to "live" as you're supposed to
come, but it seems to me that a nice extra bit of paranoia
would be to take snapshots 2-3 times per day of the live
database. The image would be consistent, and Oracle would
…
[View More]come up off of it as it would from a crash (unlike, say a
tar of the data-files which would be junk). The only problem
would be that you would loose any half-completed
actions which were not correctly tansactionalized. Can
anyone comment on this?
3. Has anyone seen roughly how much storage an Oracle snapshot
takes? It seems to me that it would be larger than a
filesystem snapshot because more blocks are changing. Of
course, it depends on your read/write ratio, but is there a
general consensus?
I've so far been very impressed with my filer. Oracle over NFS sounded
outright dumb to me at first, but damn if it isn't faster than local
disk.
Thanks.
--
Aaron Sherman
Systems Architect
HighWired.com -- The global high school community
http://www.highwired.com
300 North Beacon Street
Watertown, MA 02472
(617) 926-1850 x238
(617) 926-1861 fax
asherman(a)highwired-inc.com / ICQ#43677395 / Y!ajstrader
"We had some good machines, but they don't work no more."
-"Faded Flowers" / Shriekback
[View Less]
"Todd C. Merrill" <tmerrill(a)mathworks.com> writes:
> I wonder....at what point can we no longer call our beloved
> single-function appliance a toaster and must call it, say, a kitchen? ;)
I really, really hope that doesn't happen.
Darrell
Klaus,
I change drives on the fly all the time. ESD is a big issue here, so get out
your antistatic wrist-strap and make sure the host and library share the
same power connection/ground!
Make sure the new drive is the same type, SCSI-ID and if possible same
FirmWare. The host will see the new drive, just make sure it is not
down/offline when you are finished.
This is not the recommended way, but often you just can't wait several weeks
for the next sheduled downtime. This goes for most …
[View More]systems, not just filers.
-OYOY-
Med hilsen - Best Regards,
Karl Erik Øyøygard
ProAct Systems AS
Postboks 3047 - Lade
Haakon VII's gt. 7
7002 Trondheim
Tlf: 73 92 21 44 Fax: 73 92 08 88
Mob:93 25 24 24
E-mail: karl(a)proact.no
SMS: +4793252424(a)sms.netcom.no
---------------------------------------------
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
wrong. -- H L Mencken
[View Less]
Burt 14378 addresses this problem. It is fixed in a future release.
When changing the filer's domain, if the builtin/administrators group
contains the old domain's administrators group, it is removed and the
new domain's administrators group is added.
Joan Pearson
>From: Karl Erik Øyøygard <karl(a)proact.no>
>To: toasters(a)mathworks.com
>Subject: RE: Moving from one NT domain to another.
>Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 19:23:44 +0200
>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.…
[View More]21)
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by smtp.mathworks.com id NAA27433
>Sender: owner-dl-toasters(a)netapp.com
>
>Jeremy,
>
>You are right, the administrator (DomainAdmins) of the OLD domain will still
>be member of the local administrators on the filer after the move, because
>Lclgroups.cfg is not updated.
>
>This is how I do this:
>
>Rename cifssec.cfg, filersid.cfg and lclgroups.cfg in /etc on the filer.
>Add filer via servermanager to the new domain.
>Run `cifs setup`
>Edit /etc/cifsconfig.cfg and remove all referances to users/groups in the
>old domain. They will not show up correctly in FilerView!
>And you may have to correct the ACL's on a LOT of files... Remember to set
>new users as owner of home directory's for cifs homedir to work...
>
>I'm not sure you need to get cifssec and filersid out of the way, but it
>will work if you do.
>
>Good luck!
>
>-OYOY-
>
>Med hilsen - Best Regards,
>Karl Erik Øyøygard
>ProAct Systems AS
>Postboks 3047 - Lade
>Haakon VII's gt. 7
>7002 Trondheim
>Tlf: 73 92 21 44 Fax: 73 92 08 88
>Mob:93 25 24 24
>
>E-mail: karl(a)proact.no
>SMS: +4793252424(a)sms.netcom.no
>---------------------------------------------
>For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
>wrong. -- H L Mencken
>> We have an interesting problem that I'm hoping somebody on the list has
>> first-hand experience with. We could use some suggestions.
>>
>> We are going to be moving from one NT domain to another. An account in
>> Domain A, user1 does not have the same SID as the same account name in
>> Domain B, so once you move, you would have to go through and reassign
>> access permissions with the account in Domain B. This would be acceptable
>>
>> to us, but the problem is the same situation occurs for Administrator
>> between the two domains, so we're worried about losing Administrator
>> access
>> to our filer. We would be able to put up with reassigning all user
>> permissions afterward if we could resolve the Administrator problem.
>>
>> The question is, how do we move a filer from one NT domain to another, and
>>
>> still have Administrator access to it afterward?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -- jeremy
>
[View Less]
Jeremy,
You are right, the administrator (DomainAdmins) of the OLD domain will still
be member of the local administrators on the filer after the move, because
Lclgroups.cfg is not updated.
This is how I do this:
Rename cifssec.cfg, filersid.cfg and lclgroups.cfg in /etc on the filer.
Add filer via servermanager to the new domain.
Run `cifs setup`
Edit /etc/cifsconfig.cfg and remove all referances to users/groups in the
old domain. They will not show up correctly in FilerView!
And you may …
[View More]have to correct the ACL's on a LOT of files... Remember to set
new users as owner of home directory's for cifs homedir to work...
I'm not sure you need to get cifssec and filersid out of the way, but it
will work if you do.
Good luck!
-OYOY-
Med hilsen - Best Regards,
Karl Erik Øyøygard
ProAct Systems AS
Postboks 3047 - Lade
Haakon VII's gt. 7
7002 Trondheim
Tlf: 73 92 21 44 Fax: 73 92 08 88
Mob:93 25 24 24
E-mail: karl(a)proact.no
SMS: +4793252424(a)sms.netcom.no
---------------------------------------------
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
wrong. -- H L Mencken
> We have an interesting problem that I'm hoping somebody on the list has
> first-hand experience with. We could use some suggestions.
>
> We are going to be moving from one NT domain to another. An account in
> Domain A, user1 does not have the same SID as the same account name in
> Domain B, so once you move, you would have to go through and reassign
> access permissions with the account in Domain B. This would be acceptable
>
> to us, but the problem is the same situation occurs for Administrator
> between the two domains, so we're worried about losing Administrator
> access
> to our filer. We would be able to put up with reassigning all user
> permissions afterward if we could resolve the Administrator problem.
>
> The question is, how do we move a filer from one NT domain to another, and
>
> still have Administrator access to it afterward?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- jeremy
[View Less]
Nicholas,
1. It depends how you define performance. Restoring a database in
a very short time is also great performance, and you will not
get that in DAS, no unless you pay for 1 more copy of the data.
2. You should always look not at performance alone, but on
price/performance, which today is with all these TCO-based
calculations. This brings to the point where a fully loaded F760
with Gigabit card, can perform better than you can think of
compared with those DAS systems, …
[View More]which forces you to the old world
of static unshared copies of volumes...
I believe that the fact that more and more eCommerce sites are
choosing NAS (and mainly from its market leader...) as the solution
will prove you better than any benchmark that this is totally
possible and usable solution.
Eyal.
(I ran a small Orcale database of ~5gb, no problems, have no idea
on bigger configs... sorry!)
=====
Yours,
Eyal Traitel
eTraitel(a)yahoo.com, Home: 972-3-5290415 (Tel Aviv)
*** eTraitel - it's the new eBuzzword ! ***
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/
[View Less]
Whoops, my screw up. I said raid 0 when I ment raid 1. This would make it
6 disks, not 3. But still the point is valid. 6 disks versus 14 is a large
amount of disks.