For those following, I’ve asked the core TMEs for an updated TR-3838 which currently only goes to 3TB disks and “smaller” aggrs than FAS8080 supports.
Hi Tim – long time no see!
Peter
From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Mohler Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 8:40 PM To: NGC-tnaple-berkcom.com; 'Toasters' Subject: Re: Max Aggr Size is based on..
That's where I'm at as well. Netapp doesnt directly say..but they dont have "round numbers" on anything. I probly knew this well, in like 2001.
_________________________________ Jeff Mohlermailto:jmohler@yahoo-inc.com Tech Yahoo, Storage Architect, Principal (831)454-6712 YPAC Gold Member Twitter: @PrincipalYahoo CorpIM: Hipchat & Iris
On Monday, February 8, 2016 8:34 PM, Timothy Naple <tnaple@BERKCOM.commailto:tnaple@BERKCOM.com> wrote:
It is based on the right sized capacity. So if this was The Price is Right, the 105 would win. I think the actual answer is 107.
Tim
From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.netmailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Mohler Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 8:24 PM To: Toasters Subject: Max Aggr Size is based on..
Marketing disk size (4T) Or.. Raw block size (3.815T)
Which makes a 400T aggr either 100 disks, or 105.
Beer bet to settle here. :)