I thought they where planning to move to 100TB volumes in the very near future (7.4?)
-----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of James Beal Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:22 PM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Re: HSM/ILM for Netapp
To me, the big issue I want to see addressed is the size of NetApp Aggregates. 16Tb aggregates are *stupid* esp since they have Raid Groups.
This is a serious issue for us, one group in particular will not consider any file system less than 50Tb.
Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance.
In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment to this email.