Yes, using failover groups across an 8 node 6220 cluster, works very well, had quite a few fail overs in the last 2.5 years, and the system has maintained service during all of them, so well that the applications/users failed to notice anything happening, including a decent sized VMWare setup, getting it’s storage via NFS.
~Mark
mark.flint@sanger.ac.uk
On 14 Apr 2015, at 13:30, Martin martin@leggatt.me.uk wrote:
Interesting thread....
A peer suggested recently that in cDOT failover groups could be used instead of ifgrps for availability. It was suggested as it simplifies the configuration (don't have ifgrps and failover groups) and means a LIF can failover to any port in the cluster (depending on type of LIF of course) rather than just the ports on the node.
Not considering throughput has anyone else heard of or considered this configuration?
Thanks Martin
-- View this message in context: http://network-appliance-toasters.10978.n7.nabble.com/FAS8040-network-config... Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters