Hi Jeremy,
it seems that a additional Flash Card make sense:
stats show -p flexscale-pcs (Default Mode)
Usage Hit Meta Miss Hit Evict Inval Insert Chain Blocks Chain Blocks Replaced % /s /s /s % /s /s /s /s /s /s /s /s 43 1919 79 1239 60 0 19 4559 0 0 0 0 503 43 2299 0 6238 26 0 0 4199 0 0 0 0 563 43 1979 179 5498 26 0 0 6418 0 0 0 0 593 43 2079 0 3659 36 19 0 5358 0 0 0 0 435 43 2859 0 4379 39 0 0 4839 0 0 0 0 621 43 2499 199 3019 45 19 19 7178 0 0 0 0 774 43 2299 0 3479 39 0 0 5218 0 0 0 0 478 43 2179 159 1119 66 0 0 1419 0 0 0 0 756 43 1899 19 1319 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 446 43 2279 0 1979 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 490 43 1879 39 1659 53 19 19 4679 0 0 0 0 498 43 2239 0 919 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 346 43 3039 99 1379 68 0 0 4139 0 0 0 0 726
greets
Steffen
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Page, Jeremy [mailto:jeremy.page@gilbarco.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 18:31 An: Steffen Knauf Cc: toasters@teaparty.net Betreff: RE: Raidgroupsize and I/O Performance
You can use stats show -p flexscale-pcs to see an estimate of what the flash cache would pick up.
Jeremy Page|Senior Technical Architect|Gilbarco Veeder-Root, A Danaher Company Office:336-547-5399|Cell:336-601-7274|24x7 Emergency:336-430-8151
________________________________________