What situation are you still seeing virus files deposited? The only
situations I'm aware of would be if a client placed the file there via NFS,
then no scan takes place, or if a virus-infected file is embedded deep in an
archive such as a zip or tar file.
In the first case though, when a windows client attempts to read the file, I
believe the virus scan will still take place, so it should get caught then.
I'm not sure what solution there is to a deeply embedded virus. Most
systems (server or desktop) simply can't handle the performance hit of doing
deep scans of every zip file.
--
Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Remedy, a BMC Software Company
-----Original Message-----
From: David Papas [mailto:david.papas@newisys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:13 PM
To: toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: RE: Virus Scanning
I asked tis list recently regarding the "most popular software" part of
your question. Trend seems to have been the winner in that poll,
followed by Symantec.
The reason I was inquiring is that, despite having file system and mail
scanners everywhere else, I found it is still possible to deposit
viruses on the filer. With a batch of infected files there, it is only
a matter of time until an unprotected client connects and keeps
spreading the love.
-D.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Hardin [mailto:geoff.hardin@dalsemi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:45 AM
> To: toasters@mathworks.com
> Subject: Virus Scanning
>
>
> I was wondering what other admins were using for virus scanning.
> And as an aside, I really want to know whether it is worth
> the time and
> money. Basically, I've been asked to evaluate the virus scanning
> software out there for the filers, but I'm not really sure it's even
> necessary.
> I am a UNIX admin, so I typically don't see the viruses
> that plague
> my NT compatriots, but I don't believe we've really had a
> problem on our
> filers with CIFS shares. But maybe I'm just biased, so
> that's why I'm
> asking for your input.
>
> 1. Which A/V software do you use
> a) McAfee NetShield for Netapp
> b) Symantec Antivirus for Netapp
> c) Trend Micro Server Protect
> d) other (are there any others?)
>
> 2. Is it really necessary? Please explain your answer.
>
>
> Thanks for any and all input.
>
> Geoff Hardin
> UNIX System Administrator
> geoff.hardin@dalsemi.com
> This space is for rent in order to increase company revenue.
>
>