Andrei,
The vague warnings can be seen below when we updated to 8.3.2P1
Joel
fc1-hall::> cluster image show-update-progress
Estimated Elapsed Update Phase Status Duration Duration -------------------- ----------------- --------------- --------------- Pre-update checks completed 00:10:00 00:00:01 Data ONTAP updates completed 01:05:00 00:31:01 Post-update checks completed 00:10:00 00:00:00 3 entries were displayed.
Updated nodes: fc1-hall-n1, fc1-hall-n2.
fc1-hall::> cluster image show-update-log Trans Phase Transaction Id Component Id Time Stamp Status ------------- ------------ ----- ----------------- ----------- --------------- package- cleanup- 43 fc1-hall-n1 4/29/2016 completed management package 14:22:11
package- cleanup- 44 fc1-hall-n2 4/29/2016 completed management package 14:22:11
package- process- 45 fc1-hall-n1 4/29/2016 completed management package 15:02:58
package- synch-image 46 fc1-hall-n2 4/29/2016 completed management 15:03:08
validation initialize 47 MUM 4/29/2016 completed 15:30:12 Details: Warning: Manual validation checks need to be performed. Refer to the Upgrade Advisor Plan or the "Clustered Data ONTAP Upgrade and Revert/Downgrade Guide" for the remaining validation checks that need to be performed before update. Failing to do so can result in an update failure or an I/O disruption., Action: Refer to the Upgrade Advisor Plan or the "Clustered Data ONTAP Upgrade and Revert/Downgrade Guide" for the remaining validation checks that need to be performed before update..
validation mount-image 48 fc1-hall-n1 4/29/2016 completed 15:30:11
validation mount-image 49 fc1-hall-n2 4/29/2016 completed 15:30:11
validation get-health 50 MUM 4/29/2016 completed 15:30:11
Trans Phase Transaction Id Component Id Time Stamp Status ------------- ------------ ----- ----------------- ----------- --------------- validation run-scripts 51 fc1-hall-n1 4/29/2016 completed 15:30:11
validation run-scripts 52 fc1-hall-n2 4/29/2016 completed 15:30:12 Details: Warning: Manual validation checks need to be performed. Refer to the Upgrade Advisor Plan or the "Clustered Data ONTAP Upgrade and Revert/Downgrade Guide" for the remaining validation checks that need to be performed before update. Failing to do so can result in an update failure or an I/O disruption., Action: Refer to the Upgrade Advisor Plan or the "Clustered Data ONTAP Upgrade and Revert/Downgrade Guide" for the remaining validation checks that need to be performed before update..
validation unmount- 53 fc1-hall-n1 4/29/2016 completed image 15:30:12
validation unmount- 54 fc1-hall-n2 4/29/2016 completed image 15:30:12
validation complete- 55 MUM 4/29/2016 completed validation 15:30:12
ontap-updates initialize 56 MUM 4/29/2016 completed 16:01:31
ontap-updates do-download- 57 fc1-hall-n1 4/29/2016 completed job 15:31:28 Details: Info: Download complete.
ontap-updates do-download- 58 fc1-hall-n2 4/29/2016 completed job 15:31:32 Details: Info: Download complete.
Trans Phase Transaction Id Component Id Time Stamp Status ------------- ------------ ----- ----------------- ----------- --------------- ontap-updates do-failover- 59 fc1-hall-n1 4/29/2016 completed job 15:37:20 Details: Info: Takeover complete.
ontap-updates do-failover- 60 fc1-hall-n2 4/29/2016 completed job 15:52:16 Details: Info: Takeover complete.
ontap-updates do-giveback- 61 fc1-hall-n1 4/29/2016 completed job 15:46:40 Details: Info: Giveback complete.
ontap-updates do-giveback- 62 fc1-hall-n2 4/29/2016 completed job 16:01:31 Details: Info: Giveback complete.
post-update- initialize 63 MUM 4/29/2016 completed checks 16:01:31
post-update- do- 64 MUM 4/29/2016 completed checks postupdate- 16:01:31 checks-task Details: Info: All checks completed succcessfully..
22 entries were displayed.
On 06/29/2016 10:04 AM, andrei.borzenkov@ts.fujitsu.com wrote:
Sorry, I somehow miss the warnings. Could you show them?
With best regards
Andrei Borzenkov Senior system engineer FTS WEMEAI RUC RU SC TMS FOS
FUJITSU Zemlyanoy Val Street, 9, 105 064 Moscow, Russian Federation Tel.: +7 495 730 62 20 ( reception) Mob.: +7 916 678 7208 Fax: +7 495 730 62 14 E-mail: Andrei.Borzenkov@ts.fujitsu.com Web: ru.fujitsu.com Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint This communication contains information that is confidential, proprietary in nature and/or privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original communication. Thank you for your cooperation. Please be advised that neither Fujitsu, its affiliates, its employees or agents accept liability for any errors, omissions or damages caused by delays of receipt or by any virus infection in this message or its attachments, or which may otherwise arise as a result of this e-mail transmission.
-----Original Message----- From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters- bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Joel Krajden Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 3:57 PM To: toasters Subject: Intercluster lifs use an ifgroup but and local target is itself
There were warnings the last time I upgraded cDOT from 8.3.2RC2 to 8.3.2 GA and again when going from 8.3.2GA to 8.3.2P1
The warnings had no errors associate with them and the upgrade failover/giveback completed without any problems.
I wonder if the warnings are related to the fact that each node in the HA cluster has an an ifgroup using two 10G physical ports.
The ifgroup a0a is shared using one vlan for the data lifs, and another vlan for the IC lifs.
The data lifs failover to the other node's data lifs but the IC lifs failover to the local node where the target is itself.
The network infrastructure between the separate buildings where the second cluster lives is such that we cannot use another set of physical ports for the intercluster lifs on the node.
Are the vague warnings when upgrading hinting that this is not an optimal configuration?
fc1-ev::> network interface show -vserver uperc -lif email.filers - failover Logical Home Failover Failover Vserver Interface Node:Port Policy Group
uperc email.filers fc1-ev-n2:a0a-539 system-defined DATA_PUB Failover Targets: fc1-ev-n2:a0a-539, fc1-ev-n1:a0a-539
fc1-ev::> network interface show -role intercluster -failover * Logical Home Failover Failover Vserver Interface Node:Port Policy Group
fc1-ev fc1-ev-n1_ic1 fc1-ev-n1:a0a-736 local-only IC Failover Targets: fc1-ev-n1:a0a-736 fc1-ev-n2_ic1 fc1-ev-n2:a0a-736 local-only IC Failover Targets: fc1-ev-n2:a0a-736
-- Joel Krajden: Core Technologies Manager Engineering & Computer Science Concordia University EV-8.142 Tel: 514 848-2424 3052 joelk@encs.concordia.ca _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters