There is really no good reason to use "soft" when using RW. Just asking, begging for data corruption.
I remember a post many years ago from Guy Harris (you know, one of the guys who actually help invent NFS!) and it was basically this"
"Never ever ever ever ever ever use soft...."
I know there are case over a WAN where it might help, or maybe if you are using ReadOnly.
--tmac
*Tim McCarthy* *Principal Consultant*
Clustered ONTAP Clustered ONTAP NCDA ID: XK7R3GEKC1QQ2LVD RHCE6 110-107-141 https://www.redhat.com/wapps/training/certification/verify.html?certNumber=110-107-141&isSearch=False&verify=Verify NCSIE ID: C14QPHE21FR4YWD4 Expires: 27 October 2016 Current until Aug 02, 2016 Expires: 29 October 2016
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Roy McMorran mcmorran@mdibl.org wrote:
On 7/22/15 9:59 AM, Francis Kim wrote:
rsize and wsize set to 32k on your nfs v3 client?
Yes.
rsize=32768,wsize=32768,intr,rw,soft,bg,tcp,vers=3
NetApp has suggested I try fiddling with this a bit but I haven't gotten 'round to it yet.
Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters